| Literature DB >> 28373785 |
Jan-Erik Gülker1, Lars Bansemir1, Heinrich G Klues1, Alexander Bufe2.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of total chronic coronary occlusion (CTO) still remains a major challenge. The prevalence of a CTO has been reported to be up to 30% among patients with a clinical indication for coronary angiography. Progress has been made with further advanced interventional techniques and continuously sophisticated interventional tools. Nevertheless the number of interventions carried out to recanalize a CTO is less than 10% of all procedures. Benefits of a successful CTO recanalization include relief of angina pectoris and ischemia-related dyspnea, substantial improvement in left ventricular function and, avoidance of surgery treatment. A vast variety of new CTO PCI techniques and materials has been introduced into clinical practise and pushed success rates of reopening a CTO up to around 90% in experienced hands. Particulary the introduction of the retrograde technique was a milestone. New developed microcatheters and special polymer coated wires allow to recanalize via small collaterals and vessels. Other tools such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and multislice computertomography (MSCT) help to identify the anatomy and the characteristic of the lesions. Any invasive cardiac center should adopt CTO PCI procedures as standard therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic total occlusion; Coronary artery disease; Latest development; Recanalization strategies; Technical innovation
Year: 2016 PMID: 28373785 PMCID: PMC5366668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2016.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Saudi Heart Assoc ISSN: 1016-7315
Fig. 1Parallel wire technique.
Fig. 2Retrograde CTO crossing techniques: (A) retrograde wiring, (B) kissing wire technique, (C) reverse CART technique, and (D) CART technique [32]. CART = controlled antegrade and retrograde tracking; CTO = chronic total coronary occlusion.
Overview of currently available CTO wires.
| Wire | Manufacturer | Design | Coating | Tip load (g) | Penetration force (kg/in.2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fielder XT | Asahi | Tapered tip 0.009 in.; shaft 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, polymer jacket | 0.8 | N/A |
| Fielder XT-A | Asahi | Tapered tip 0.009 in.; shaft 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, polymer jacket | 1.0 | N/A |
| Fielder XT-R | Asahi | Tapered tip 0.009 in.; shaft 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, polymer jacket | 0.6 | N/A |
| Sion | Asahi | Nontapered tip 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, nonjacketed over spring coil and tip | 0.7 | N/A |
| Sion Blue | Asahi | Nontapered tip 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, nonjacketed over spring coil. Hydrophobic tip | 0.5 | N/A |
| Gaia First | Asahi | Tapered tip 0.010 in.; shaft 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, nonjacketed. Tip hydrophilic | 1.5 | N/A |
| Gaia Second | Asahi | Tapered tip 0.011 in.; shaft 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, nonjacketed. Tip hydrophilic | 3.5 | N/A |
| Gaia Third | Asahi | Tapered tip 0.011 in.; shaft 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, nonjacketed. Tip hydrophilic | 4.5 | N/A |
| Miracle 3 | Asahi | Nontapered tip 0.014 in. | Hydrophobic | 3.0 | 20 |
| Confianza Pro 12 | Asahi | Tapered tip 0.009 in.; shaft 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic nonjacketed over spring coil. Hydrophobic tip and shaft | 12.0 | 189 |
| Progress 40 | Abbott | Nontapered tip 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, nonjacketed | 4.8 | 30 |
| Progress 120 | Abbott | Nontapered tip 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, nonjacketed | 13.9 | 90 |
| Progress 140T | Abbott | Tapered tip 0.0105 in.; shaft 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, nonjacketed | 12.5 | 144 |
| Pilot 50 | Abbott | Nontapered tip 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, polymer jacket | 1.5 | N/A |
| Pilot 150 | Abbott | Nontapered tip 0.014 in. | Hydrophilic, polymer jacketed | 2.7 | N/A |
G. Touma et al.
CTO = chronic total coronary occlusion; N/A = not available.