| Literature DB >> 28373690 |
D P Ryan1, K S Henzel1, B L Pearson1, M E Siwek2, A Papazoglou2, L Guo3, K Paesler1, M Yu3, R Müller4, K Xie1, S Schröder1, L Becker5,6, L Garrett5,7, S M Hölter5,7, F Neff5,8, I Rácz9, B Rathkolb5,10,11, J Rozman5,11, G Ehninger12, M Klingenspor13, T Klopstock6,14,15,16, E Wolf10, W Wurst7,15,16,17, A Zimmer9, H Fuchs5, V Gailus-Durner5, M Hrabě de Angelis5,11,18, K Sidiropoulou19, M Weiergräber2, Y Zhou3, D Ehninger1.
Abstract
Dietary intake of methyl donors, such as folic acid and methionine, shows considerable intra-individual variation in human populations. While it is recognized that maternal departures from the optimum of dietary methyl donor intake can increase the risk for mental health issues and neurological disorders in offspring, it has not been explored whether paternal dietary methyl donor intake influences behavioral and cognitive functions in the next generation. Here, we report that elevated paternal dietary methyl donor intake in a mouse model, transiently applied prior to mating, resulted in offspring animals (methyl donor-rich diet (MD) F1 mice) with deficits in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory, impaired hippocampal synaptic plasticity and reduced hippocampal theta oscillations. Gene expression analyses revealed altered expression of the methionine adenosyltransferase Mat2a and BK channel subunit Kcnmb2, which was associated with changes in Kcnmb2 promoter methylation in MD F1 mice. Hippocampal overexpression of Kcnmb2 in MD F1 mice ameliorated altered spatial learning and memory, supporting a role of this BK channel subunit in the MD F1 behavioral phenotype. Behavioral and gene expression changes did not extend into the F2 offspring generation. Together, our data indicate that paternal dietary factors influence cognitive and neural functions in the offspring generation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28373690 PMCID: PMC5984088 DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Psychiatry ISSN: 1359-4184 Impact factor: 15.992
Figure 1Impaired hippocampus-dependent learning and memory and altered hippocampal functions in MD F1 offspring mice. (a) Experimental design. (b and c) Quadrant occupancy measures (b) and target crossings (c) during a probe trial given after completion of water maze training (n=20 mice per group). Pool quadrants: TQ; AR; OQ; and AL. (d) Freezing during a context test given 1 day after training in a contextual fear conditioning paradigm (CD F1: n=17 mice; MD F1: n=14 mice). (e) Measurements of long-term potentiation at Schaffer Collateral/CA1 synapses in acute brain slices (CD F1, n=7 mice; MD F1, n=8 mice). (f) Quantification of oscillatory activity in the theta range measured during video-EEG analysis of CD F1 and MD F1 mice (n=11 mice per group). (g) Representative time frequency plots show reduced typical theta segments in a MD F1 mouse relative to a CD F1 mouse. All graphs display mean ± s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. AL, adjacent left; AR, adjacent right; CD, control diet; EEG, electroencephalogram; MD, methyl donor-rich diet; OQ, opposite quadrant; TQ, target quadrant.
Figure 2Hippocampal Kcnmb2 overexpression improved water maze impairments in MD F1 mice. (a) Experimental design. (b) Representative image of hippocampal slices infected with AAV1-hSyn1-Kcnmb2-IRES-GFP or control AAV1-hSyn1-GFP virus. Green, GFP, imaged 4 weeks after virus injection. Scale bar, 100 μm. (c) Relative Kcnmb2 mRNA expression in the hippocampus after viral infection as determined by qPCR (n=5 mice per group; two-way ANOVA with the between-subjects factors paternal diet and AAV treatment: effect of paternal diet, P=0.0214; effect of AAV treatment, P<0.0001; paternal diet × AAV treatment interaction, P=0.7084). (d and e) Quadrant occupancy measures (d) and target crossings (e) during a probe trial given after completion of water maze training (CD F1 control-AAV, n=12 mice; MD F1 control-AAV, n=12 mice; CD F1 Kcnmb2-AAV, n=8 mice; MD F1 Kcnmb2-AAV, n=8 mice). Pool quadrants: TQ; AR; OQ; and AL. All graphs display mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. AL, adjacent left; ANOVA, analysis of variance; AR, adjacent right; CD, control diet; GFP, green fluorescent protein; MD, methyl donor-rich diet; OQ, opposite quadrant; TQ, target quadrant.
Figure 3DNA methylation changes in hippocampal tissue of MD F1 mice. (a) Targeted bisulfite sequencing-based analysis of CpG methylation around the Kcnmb2 transcription start site in hippocampal tissue of MD F1 and CD F1 mice (n=4 mice per group). (b) Genome-wide DNA methylation analyses using MeDIP-chip identified processes and pathways enriched among genes linked to hypermethylated regions in MD mice (fathers, F1 offspring, F2 offspring; for full results of the Ingenuity pathway analyses, see Supplementary Data Files 3). CD, control diet; MD, methyl donor-rich diet.
Figure 4Grandpaternal exposure to a MD did not measurably affect learning and memory and hippocampal gene expression in F2 offspring mice. (a) Breeding scheme: male F1 offspring of MD and CD fathers were mated with CD F1 females to generate MD F2 and CD F2 offspring. (b and c) A probe trial performed after completion of training in a hidden version of the water maze revealed no obvious differences between MD F2 and CD F2 mice (CD F2, n=18 mice; MD F2, n=16 mice; (b), quadrant occupancy: two-way ANOVA with the between-subjects factor grandpaternal diet and the within-subjects factor quadrant: effect of grandpaternal diet, P=0.9141; effect of quadrant, P<0.0001; paternal diet × quadrant interaction, P=0.6842; (c), target crossings: two-way ANOVA with the between-subjects factor grandpaternal diet and the within-subjects factor quadrant: effect of grandpaternal diet, P=0.4356; effect of quadrant, P<0.0001; paternal diet × quadrant interaction, P=0.4648). Pool quadrants: TQ; AR; OQ; and AL. (d) MD F2 mice did not show measurably different freezing levels compared with CD F2 controls on a context test given 1 day after training in a contextual fear-conditioning task (CD F2, n=8 mice; MD F2, n=9 mice; t-test, P=0.5019). (e and f) qPCR-based quantification of hippocampal Mat2a and Kcnmb2 expression did not reveal measurable differences between MD F2 and CD F2 mice (n=12 mice per group; Mat2a: t-test, P=0.4044; Kcnmb2: t-test, P=0.7334). ANOVA, analysis of variance; AL, adjacent left; AR, adjacent right; CD, control diet; MD, methyl donor-rich diet; qPCR, quantitative PCR; OQ, opposite quadrant; TQ, target quadrant.