Leonidas Georgiou1, Nisha Sharma2, David A Broadbent1,3, Daniel J Wilson3, Barbara J Dall2, Anmol Gangi1,4, David L Buckley1. 1. Division of Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom. 4. Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate an interleaved MRI sampling strategy that acquires both high temporal resolution (HTR) dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) data for quantifying breast tumor blood flow (TBF) and high spatial resolution (HSR) DCE data for clinical reporting, following a single standard injection of contrast agent. METHODS: A simulation study was used to evaluate the performance of the interleaved technique under different conditions. In a prospective clinical study, 18 patients with primary breast cancer, who were due to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), were examined using interleaved HTR and HSR DCE-MRI at 1.5 Tesla. Tumor regions of interest were analyzed with a two-compartment tracer kinetic model. Paired parameters (n = 10) from the data acquired before and post-cycle 2 of NACT were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that TBF was reliably estimated using the proposed strategy. The region of interest analysis revealed significant changes in TBF (0.81-0.43 mL/min/mL; P = 0.002) following two cycles of NACT. The HSR data were reported in the normal way and enabled the assessment of tumor volume, which decreased by 53% following NACT (P = 0.065). CONCLUSIONS: TBF can be measured reliably using the proposed strategy without compromising a standard clinical protocol. Furthermore, in our feasibility study, TBF decreased significantly following NACT, whereas capillary permeability surface-area product did not. Magn Reson Med 79:317-326, 2018.
PURPOSE: To evaluate an interleaved MRI sampling strategy that acquires both high temporal resolution (HTR) dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) data for quantifying breast tumor blood flow (TBF) and high spatial resolution (HSR) DCE data for clinical reporting, following a single standard injection of contrast agent. METHODS: A simulation study was used to evaluate the performance of the interleaved technique under different conditions. In a prospective clinical study, 18 patients with primary breast cancer, who were due to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), were examined using interleaved HTR and HSR DCE-MRI at 1.5 Tesla. Tumor regions of interest were analyzed with a two-compartment tracer kinetic model. Paired parameters (n = 10) from the data acquired before and post-cycle 2 of NACT were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Simulations demonstrated that TBF was reliably estimated using the proposed strategy. The region of interest analysis revealed significant changes in TBF (0.81-0.43 mL/min/mL; P = 0.002) following two cycles of NACT. The HSR data were reported in the normal way and enabled the assessment of tumor volume, which decreased by 53% following NACT (P = 0.065). CONCLUSIONS: TBF can be measured reliably using the proposed strategy without compromising a standard clinical protocol. Furthermore, in our feasibility study, TBF decreased significantly following NACT, whereas capillary permeability surface-area product did not. Magn Reson Med 79:317-326, 2018.
Authors: Jean-Paul Delille; Priscilla J Slanetz; Eren D Yeh; Elkan F Halpern; Daniel B Kopans; Leoncio Garrido Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-05-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gunnar Brix; Fabian Kiessling; Robert Lucht; Susanne Darai; Klaus Wasser; Stefan Delorme; Jürgen Griebel Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David A Mankoff; Lisa K Dunnwald; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Erin K Schubert; Jeffrey Tseng; Thomas J Lawton; Hannah M Linden; Robert B Livingston Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Andrew Macdonald; Giovanni A Buonaccorsi; Sue Cheung; David L Buckley; Alan Jackson; Yvonne Watson; Karen Davies; Gordon C Jayson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Chengyue Wu; Federico Pineda; David A Hormuth; Gregory S Karczmar; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-10-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: William Stevens; Isabelle M Farrow; Leonidas Georgiou; Andrew M Hanby; Timothy J Perren; Laura M Windel; Daniel J Wilson; Nisha Sharma; David Dodwell; Thomas A Hughes; Barbara Jg Dall; David L Buckley Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 3.039