Literature DB >> 30368906

Quantitative analysis of vascular properties derived from ultrafast DCE-MRI to discriminate malignant and benign breast tumors.

Chengyue Wu1, Federico Pineda2, David A Hormuth3, Gregory S Karczmar2, Thomas E Yankeelov1,4,5,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We propose a novel methodology to integrate morphological and functional information of tumor-associated vessels to assist in the diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions. THEORY AND METHODS: Ultrafast, fast, and high spatial resolution DCE-MRI data were acquired on 15 patients with suspicious breast lesions. Segmentation of the vasculature from the surrounding tissue was performed by applying a Hessian filter to the enhanced image to generate a map of the probability for each voxel to belong to a vessel. Summary measures were generated for vascular morphology, as well as the inputs and outputs of vessels physically connected to the tumor. The ultrafast DCE-MRI data was analyzed by a modified Tofts model to estimate the bolus arrival time, Ktrans (volume transfer coefficient), and vp (plasma volume fraction). The measures were compared between malignant and benign lesions via the Wilcoxon test, and then incorporated into a logistic ridge regression model to assess their combined diagnostic ability.
RESULTS: A total of 24 lesions were included in the study (13 malignant and 11 benign). The vessel count, Ktrans , and vp showed significant difference between malignant and benign lesions (P = 0.009, 0.034, and 0.010, area under curve [AUC] = 0.76, 0.63, and 0.70, respectively). The best multivariate logistic regression model for differentiation included the vessel count and bolus arrival time (AUC = 0.91).
CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that combining quantitative characterization of morphological and functional features of breast vasculature may provide an accurate means to diagnose breast cancer.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; cancer; perfusion; pharmacokinetics; registration; segmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30368906      PMCID: PMC6347496          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  41 in total

1.  Measuring tortuosity of the intracerebral vasculature from MRA images.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bullitt; Guido Gerig; Stephen M Pizer; Weili Lin; Stephen R Aylward
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Quantitative DCE-MRI for prediction of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: the impact of breast cancer subtypes on the diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Stylianos Drisis; Thierry Metens; Michael Ignatiadis; Konstantinos Stathopoulos; Shih-Li Chao; Marc Lemort
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Gap filling of 3-D microvascular networks by tensor voting.

Authors:  L Risser; F Plouraboue; X Descombes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer?

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Kevin Strobel; Hans H Schild; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Heribert B Bieling
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL.

Authors:  Nola M Hylton; Jeffrey D Blume; Wanda K Bernreuter; Etta D Pisano; Mark A Rosen; Elizabeth A Morris; Paul T Weatherall; Constance D Lehman; Gillian M Newstead; Sandra Polin; Helga S Marques; Laura J Esserman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Kinetic Analysis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions With Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Standard Kinetic Assessment.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Abe; Naoko Mori; Keiko Tsuchiya; David V Schacht; Federico D Pineda; Yulei Jiang; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Breast vascular mapping obtained with contrast-enhanced MR imaging: implications for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Alfonso Fausto; Laura Menicagli; Anastassia Esseridou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Computed analysis of three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography angiography for determination of tumor-feeding vessels during chemoembolization of liver tumor: a pilot study.

Authors:  Frederic Deschamps; Stephen B Solomon; Raymond H Thornton; Pramod Rao; Antoine Hakime; Viseth Kuoch; Thierry de Baere
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Breast Contrast Enhanced MR Imaging: Semi-Automatic Detection of Vascular Map and Predominant Feeding Vessel.

Authors:  Antonella Petrillo; Roberta Fusco; Salvatore Filice; Vincenza Granata; Orlando Catalano; Paolo Vallone; Maurizio Di Bonito; Massimiliano D'Aiuto; Massimo Rinaldo; Immacolata Capasso; Mario Sansone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesion: Comparison with traditional kinetics modeling and semi-quantitative enhancement curve characteristics.

Authors:  Qihao Zhang; Pascal Spincemaille; Michele Drotman; Christine Chen; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler; Weiyuan Huang; Liangdong Zhou; John Morgan; Thanh D Nguyen; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and tumor forecasting of breast cancer patients in the community setting.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Anum S Kazerouni; Chengyue Wu; John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Julie C DiCarlo; David A Hormuth; David A Ekrut; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Sarah Avery; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; Guillermo Lorenzo; David A Hormuth; Ernesto A B F Lima; Kalina P Slavkova; Julie C DiCarlo; John Virostko; Caleb M Phillips; Debra Patt; Caroline Chung; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Biophys Rev (Melville)       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 4.  Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Nathaniel Braman; Amit Gupta; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 65.011

5.  Patient-Specific Characterization of Breast Cancer Hemodynamics Using Image-Guided Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; David A Hormuth; Todd A Oliver; Federico Pineda; Guillermo Lorenzo; Gregory S Karczmar; Robert D Moser; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  An in silico validation framework for quantitative DCE-MRI techniques based on a dynamic digital phantom.

Authors:  Chengyue Wu; David A Hormuth; Ty Easley; Victor Eijkhout; Federico Pineda; Gregory S Karczmar; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 13.828

7.  Multiparametric Analysis of Longitudinal Quantitative MRI data to Identify Distinct Tumor Habitats in Preclinical Models of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anum K Syed; Jennifer G Whisenant; Stephanie L Barnes; Anna G Sorace; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  A hybrid model of tumor growth and angiogenesis: In silico experiments.

Authors:  Caleb M Phillips; Ernesto A B F Lima; Ryan T Woodall; Amy Brock; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Towards integration of 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab PET-CT and MRI with mathematical modeling to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2 + breast cancer.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; David A Hormuth; Vikram Adhikarla; Prativa Sahoo; Daniel Abler; Lusine Tumyan; Daniel Schmolze; Joanne Mortimer; Russell C Rockne; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.