Literature DB >> 28369841

Attentional capture in driving displays.

Mahé Arexis1, François Maquestiaux1, Nicholas Gaspelin2, Eric Ruthruff3, André Didierjean1,4.   

Abstract

Drivers face frequent distraction on the roadways, but little is known about situations placing them at risk of misallocating visual attention. To investigate this issue, we asked participants to search for a red target embedded within simulated driving scenes (photographs taken from inside a car) in three experiments. Distraction was induced by presenting, via a GPS unit, red or green distractors positioned in an irrelevant location at which the target never appeared. If the salient distractor captures attention, visual search should be slower on distractor-present trials than distractor-absent trials. In Experiment 1, salient distractors yielded no such capture effect. In Experiment 2, we decreased the frequency of the salient distractor from 50% of trials to only 10% or 20% of trials. Capture effects were almost five times larger for the 10% occurrence group than for the 20% occurrence group. In Experiment 3, the amount of available central resources was manipulated by asking participants to either simultaneously monitor or ignore a stream of spoken digits. Capture effects were much larger for the dual-task group than for the single-task group. In summary, these findings identify risk factors for attentional capture in real-world driving scenes: distractor rarity and diversion of attention.
© 2016 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990GPSzzm321990; attentional capture; driving; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28369841      PMCID: PMC5380227          DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  26 in total

1.  Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Driven to distraction: dual-Task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone.

Authors:  D L Strayer; W A Johnston
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

3.  Top-down contingent attentional capture during feed-forward visual processing.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Gernot Horstmann; Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-06-17

4.  Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  James R Brockmole; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?

Authors:  Jonathan Levy; Harold Pashler; Erwin Boer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

6.  Capturing focused attention.

Authors:  Gabriel Neo; Fook K Chua
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-11

7.  Unexpected abrupt onsets can override a top-down set for color.

Authors:  Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Breaking through the attentional window: capture by abrupt onsets versus color singletons.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff; Mei-Ching Lien; Kyunghun Jung
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Visual information processing from multiple displays.

Authors:  James C Johnston; Eric Ruthruff; Mei-Ching Lien
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fear of Missing Out Predicts Distraction by Social Reward Signals Displayed on a Smartphone in Difficult Driving Situations.

Authors:  Jérémy Matias; Jean-Charles Quinton; Michèle Colomb; Alice Normand; Marie Izaute; Laetitia Silvert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.