Literature DB >> 25850158

Visual information processing from multiple displays.

James C Johnston1, Eric Ruthruff2, Mei-Ching Lien3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined how effectively people can monitor new stimuli on a peripheral display while carrying out judgments on an adjacent central display.
BACKGROUND: Improved situation awareness is critical for improved operator performance in aviation and many other domains. Given the limited extent of foveal processing, acquiring additional information from peripheral vision offers high potential gains.
METHOD: Participants carried out a sequence of central perceptual judgments while simultaneously monitoring the periphery for new stimuli. Peripheral detection was measured as a function of central-judgment difficulty, the relative timing of the two tasks, and peripheral event rate.
RESULTS: Participants accurately detected and located peripheral targets, even at the highest eccentricity explored here (~30°). Peripheral detection was not reduced by increased central-task difficulty but was reduced when peripheral targets arrived later in the processing of central stimuli and when peripheral events were relatively rare.
CONCLUSION: Under favorable conditions-high-contrast stimuli and high event rate-people can successfully monitor peripheral displays for new events while carrying out an unrelated continuous task on an adjacent display. APPLICATION: In many fields, such as aviation, existing displays were designed with low-contrast stimuli that provide little opportunity for peripheral vision. With appropriate redesign, operators might successfully monitor multiple displays over a large visual field. Designers need to be aware of nonvisual factors, such as low event rate and relative event timing, that can lead to failures to detect peripheral stimuli.
© 2014, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; aviation; dual task; monitoring; peripheral detection; situation awareness; vigilance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25850158     DOI: 10.1177/0018720814545974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  3 in total

1.  Attentional capture in driving displays.

Authors:  Mahé Arexis; François Maquestiaux; Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff; André Didierjean
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2016-03-28

2.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-29

3.  Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.