Cassie J Hilditch1, Jillian Dorrian2, Siobhan Banks2. 1. E.P. Bradley Sleep Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Centre for Sleep Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Electronic address: cassie.hilditch@mymail.unisa.edu.au. 2. Centre for Sleep Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Napping is a widely used countermeasure to sleepiness and impaired performance caused by sleep loss and circadian pressure. Sleep inertia, the period of grogginess and impaired performance experienced after waking, is a potential side effect of napping. Many industry publications recommend naps of 30 min or less to avoid this side effect. However, the evidence to support this advice is yet to be thoroughly reviewed. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched, and defined criteria were applied to select articles for review. The review covers literature on naps of 30 min or less regarding (a) sleep inertia, (b) slow-wave sleep (SWS) and (c) the relationship between sleep inertia and SWS. RESULTS: The review found that although the literature on short afternoon naps is relatively comprehensive, there are very few studies on naps of 30 min or less at night. Studies have mixed results regarding the onset of SWS and the duration and severity of sleep inertia following short naps, making guidelines regarding their use unclear. The varying results are likely due to differing sleep/wake profiles before the nap of interest and the time of the day at waking. CONCLUSIONS: The review highlights the need to have more detailed guidelines about the implementation of short naps according to the time of the day and prior sleep/wake history. Without this context, such a recommendation is potentially misleading. Further research is required to better understand the interactions between these factors, especially at night, and to provide more specific recommendations.
OBJECTIVES: Napping is a widely used countermeasure to sleepiness and impaired performance caused by sleep loss and circadian pressure. Sleep inertia, the period of grogginess and impaired performance experienced after waking, is a potential side effect of napping. Many industry publications recommend naps of 30 min or less to avoid this side effect. However, the evidence to support this advice is yet to be thoroughly reviewed. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched, and defined criteria were applied to select articles for review. The review covers literature on naps of 30 min or less regarding (a) sleep inertia, (b) slow-wave sleep (SWS) and (c) the relationship between sleep inertia and SWS. RESULTS: The review found that although the literature on short afternoon naps is relatively comprehensive, there are very few studies on naps of 30 min or less at night. Studies have mixed results regarding the onset of SWS and the duration and severity of sleep inertia following short naps, making guidelines regarding their use unclear. The varying results are likely due to differing sleep/wake profiles before the nap of interest and the time of the day at waking. CONCLUSIONS: The review highlights the need to have more detailed guidelines about the implementation of short naps according to the time of the day and prior sleep/wake history. Without this context, such a recommendation is potentially misleading. Further research is required to better understand the interactions between these factors, especially at night, and to provide more specific recommendations.
Authors: Indira Gurubhagavatula; Laura K Barger; Christopher M Barnes; Mathias Basner; Diane B Boivin; Drew Dawson; Christopher L Drake; Erin E Flynn-Evans; Vincent Mysliwiec; P Daniel Patterson; Kathryn J Reid; Charles Samuels; Nita Lewis Shattuck; Uzma Kazmi; Gerard Carandang; Jonathan L Heald; Hans P A Van Dongen Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Leonard S Weiss; Matthew D Weaver; David D Salcido; Samantha E Opitz; Tiffany S Okerman; Tanner T Smida; Sarah E Martin; Francis X Guyette; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton W Callaway Journal: Trials Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Eva Gesteiro; Raquel Aparicio-Ugarriza; María Del Carmen García-Centeno; David Escobar-Toledo; Asier Mañas; Jorge Pérez-Gómez; Narcís Gusi; Alba Gómez-Cabello; Ignacio Ara; Jose A Casajús; Germán Vicente-Rodríguez; Marcela González-Gross Journal: Gerontol Geriatr Med Date: 2022-09-19