| Literature DB >> 34666885 |
Indira Gurubhagavatula1,2, Laura K Barger3,4, Christopher M Barnes5, Mathias Basner6, Diane B Boivin7, Drew Dawson8, Christopher L Drake9, Erin E Flynn-Evans10, Vincent Mysliwiec11, P Daniel Patterson12, Kathryn J Reid13, Charles Samuels14, Nita Lewis Shattuck15, Uzma Kazmi16, Gerard Carandang16, Jonathan L Heald17, Hans P A Van Dongen18,19.
Abstract
CITATION: Risks associated with fatigue that accumulates during work shifts have historically been managed through working time arrangements that specify fixed maximum durations of work shifts and minimum durations of time off. By themselves, such arrangements are not sufficient to curb risks to performance, safety, and health caused by misalignment between work schedules and the biological regulation of waking alertness and sleep. Science-based approaches for determining shift duration and mitigating associated risks, while addressing operational needs, require: (1) a recognition of the factors contributing to fatigue and fatigue-related risks; (2) an understanding of evidence-based countermeasures that may reduce fatigue and/or fatigue-related risks; and (3) an informed approach to selecting workplace-specific strategies for managing work hours. We propose a series of guiding principles to assist stakeholders with designing a shift duration decision-making process that effectively balances the need to meet operational demands with the need to manage fatigue-related risks.Entities:
Keywords: alertness; circadian rhythms; mental fatigue; occupational medicine; policy making; productivity; shift scheduling; sleep homeostasis; sleepiness; working time arrangements
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34666885 PMCID: PMC8636361 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Sleep Med ISSN: 1550-9389 Impact factor: 4.062