| Literature DB >> 34512223 |
Tsung-Hao Hsieh1,2, Meng-Hsuan Liu1,3, Chin-En Kuo4, Yung-Hung Wang5, Sheng-Fu Liang1,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sleep is an important human activity. Comfortable sensing and accurate analysis in sleep monitoring is beneficial to many healthcare and medical applications. From 2020, owing to the COVID‑19 pandemic that spreads between people when they come into close physical contact with one another, the willingness to go to hospital for receiving care has reduced; care-at-home is the trend in modern healthcare. Therefore, a home-use and real-time sleep-staging system is developed in this paper.Entities:
Keywords: Automatic sleep-staging method; EEG; EOG; Eye mask; Home use; Mobile platform; MobileNetV2; Real time
Year: 2021 PMID: 34512223 PMCID: PMC8418457 DOI: 10.1007/s40846-021-00649-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Biol Eng ISSN: 1609-0985 Impact factor: 1.553
Fig. 1System development flowchart
Fig. 2Circuits of the designed portable wireless physiological measurement module: A Top board circuit with MCU, USB plugin, SD card, and other parts; B Bottom board circuit with ADC and signal input pin; C Packaging with battery for wearable application
Specifications of the designed portable wireless physiological measurement module
| Item | PID | Function |
|---|---|---|
| MCU | nRF52840 | Frequency: 2.4 GHz RAM: 256 kB Microcontroller: ARM Cortex-M4F Bluetooth: 5.0 |
| ADC | ADS1299 | 4 channels Resolution: 24 Bits Sample rate: 250 Hz ~ 16 kHz Input range (V): 0–5.25 Gain: 1–24 |
| Accelerometer | ADXL362 | 3-axis Sensor range: ± 8 g Resolution: 12 Bits |
| Memory Card | With FAT32 page system | |
Total power cost | About 16.38 mAh |
Fig. 3A Packaged sensing module, which is connected to the eye mask with metal snap buttons; B Outside and C inside of the eye mask, which can measure the forehead EEG and EOG-R signals; The entire eye mask wearable device weighs 74 g (± 1)
Fig. 4Sleep recordings corresponding to different sleep stages obtained simultaneously by a PSG and the eye mask
Statistics of sleep measures obtained from the 25 subjects
| Sleep stage | Wake | Light | Deep | REM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg(%) | 10.78 | 53.60 | 17.38 | 18.23 |
| S.D | 7.26 | 8.16 | 3.89 | 3.88 |
| Avg(mins) | 51.3 | 255.1 | 82.7 | 86.7 |
Fig. 5Flowchart of the real-time sleep analysis procedure, wherein edge computing is employed by the embedded physiological sensing module in the eye mask to extract features and mobile computing is employed in a mobile device with MobileNETV2 for sleep-stage identification
Confusion matrices between the mobile scoring method and the visual scorings obtained with eight test subjects with respect to sleep stages and sleep measurements
| Sleep stage | Predict | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake | Light | Deep | REM | ACC | |
| Scorer | |||||
| Wake | 13.96% (99) | 0.28% (2) | 0.83% (6) | 85.20% | |
| Light | 2.49% (97) | 4.22% (164) | 6.12% (238) | 87.17% | |
| Deep | 0.35% (5) | 16.70% (236) | 0.07% (1) | 82.87% | |
| REM | 0.55% (8) | 10.15% (148) | 0.00% (0) | 89.30% | |
| ACC | |||||
Fig. 6Comparisons of subject-by-subject percentage of TST each sleep stage occupies, as estimated by the proposed system and manual PSG scoring
Fig. 7Hypnograms of two test subjects, including those of the mini-PSG manual scoring results and results of our system