Julie A Schmittdiel1, Anjali Gopalan2, Mark W Lin3, Somalee Banerjee3, Christopher V Chau2,4, Alyce S Adams2. 1. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. Julie.A.Schmittdiel@kp.org. 2. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. 3. Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA. 4. University of California at Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Population care approaches for diabetes have the potential to improve the quality of care and decrease diabetes-related mortality and morbidity. Population care strategies are particularly relevant as accountable care organizations (ACOs), patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), and integrated delivery systems are increasingly focused on managing chronic disease care at the health system level. This review outlines the key elements of population care approaches for diabetes in the current health care environment. RECENT FINDINGS: Population care approaches proactively identify diabetes patients through disease registries and electronic health record data and utilize multidisciplinary care teams, personalized provider feedback, and decision support tools to target and care for patients at risk for poor outcomes. Existing evidence suggests that these strategies can improve care outcomes and potentially ameliorate existing race/ethnic disparities in health care. However, such strategies may be less effective for patients who are disengaged from the health care system. As population care for diabetes continues to evolve, future initiatives should consider ways to tailor population care to meet individual patient needs, while leveraging improvements in clinical information systems and care integration to optimally manage and prevent diabetes in the future.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Population care approaches for diabetes have the potential to improve the quality of care and decrease diabetes-related mortality and morbidity. Population care strategies are particularly relevant as accountable care organizations (ACOs), patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), and integrated delivery systems are increasingly focused on managing chronic disease care at the health system level. This review outlines the key elements of population care approaches for diabetes in the current health care environment. RECENT FINDINGS: Population care approaches proactively identify diabetespatients through disease registries and electronic health record data and utilize multidisciplinary care teams, personalized provider feedback, and decision support tools to target and care for patients at risk for poor outcomes. Existing evidence suggests that these strategies can improve care outcomes and potentially ameliorate existing race/ethnic disparities in health care. However, such strategies may be less effective for patients who are disengaged from the health care system. As population care for diabetes continues to evolve, future initiatives should consider ways to tailor population care to meet individual patient needs, while leveraging improvements in clinical information systems and care integration to optimally manage and prevent diabetes in the future.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic illness care; Diabetes; Disparities; Population care; Population health; Quality improvement
Authors: Leah Marcotte; Joshua Seidman; Karen Trudel; Donald M Berwick; David Blumenthal; Farzad Mostashari; Sachin H Jain Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-05-14
Authors: Julie Schmittdiel; Thomas Bodenheimer; Neil A Solomon; Robin R Gillies; Stephen M Shortell Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Jay Desai; Emily B Schroeder; Andrea R Paolino; Gregory A Nichols; Jean M Lawrence; Patrick J O'Connor; Kris A Ohnsorg; Katherine M Newton; John F Steiner Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2015-03-13
Authors: Lawrence Casalino; Robin R Gillies; Stephen M Shortell; Julie A Schmittdiel; Thomas Bodenheimer; James C Robinson; Thomas Rundall; Nancy Oswald; Helen Schauffler; Margaret C Wang Journal: JAMA Date: 2003 Jan 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michelle T Vo; Connie S Uratsu; Karen R Estacio; Andrea Altschuler; Eileen Kim; Stacey E Alexeeff; Alyce S Adams; Julie A Schmittdiel; Michele Heisler; Richard W Grant Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elizabeth A Samuels; Gail D'Onofrio; Kristen Huntley; Scott Levin; Jeremiah D Schuur; Gavin Bart; Kathryn Hawk; Betty Tai; Cynthia I Campbell; Arjun K Venkatesh Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Michael E Bowen; Julie A Schmittdiel; Jeffrey T Kullgren; Ronald T Ackermann; Matthew J O'Brien Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Margaret F Zupa; Jodie Krall; Kevin Collins; Oscar Marroquin; Jason M Ng; Linda Siminerio Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 6.118