Rachel Kidman1, Philip Anglewicz2. 1. Program in Public Health and Department of Family, Population & Preventative Medicine, Stony Brook University, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, New York. Electronic address: rachel.kidman@stonybrook.edu. 2. Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Why do orphans have higher rates of HIV infection than nonorphaned peers? Research consistently assumes that orphans acquire HIV primarily through sexual behavior, but infections may instead be due to maternal transmission. Although these two pathways have very different implications for HIV programs and policies, their relative contribution has not been previously examined. In this research, we compare the contribution of maternal and sexual transmission to HIV infection among orphans in Africa. METHODS: We use Demographic and Health Survey data for 21,463 women and 18,359 men from 17 countries. We propose a conceptual framework linking orphanhood to HIV, and use mediation analysis and structural equation modeling to compare the potential contribution of maternal transmission (measured through direct pathways from orphanhood to HIV) and sexual transmission (measured through reports of risky sexual behavior) to orphan HIV infection. RESULTS: Our results suggest that maternal transmission is the predominant pathway of HIV infection among orphaned adolescents: there is strong evidence for a direct pathway from maternal (odds ratio [OR]: 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.72-3.51 for females and OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.53-3.90 for males) and double orphanhood (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.97-3.66 and OR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.68-3.82, respectively) to HIV; greater excess HIV risk in maternal versus paternal orphans. The contribution of sexual behavior is largely not significant. We do not observe correspondingly high orphan disparities in other sexually transmitted diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal transmission is a more likely explanation than sexual transmission for heightened HIV infection among orphans. These results suggest that programs designed to address HIV infection among adolescents should focus on reducing maternal transmission and on identifying and testing undiagnosed HIV among orphans.
PURPOSE: Why do orphans have higher rates of HIV infection than nonorphaned peers? Research consistently assumes that orphans acquire HIV primarily through sexual behavior, but infections may instead be due to maternal transmission. Although these two pathways have very different implications for HIV programs and policies, their relative contribution has not been previously examined. In this research, we compare the contribution of maternal and sexual transmission to HIV infection among orphans in Africa. METHODS: We use Demographic and Health Survey data for 21,463 women and 18,359 men from 17 countries. We propose a conceptual framework linking orphanhood to HIV, and use mediation analysis and structural equation modeling to compare the potential contribution of maternal transmission (measured through direct pathways from orphanhood to HIV) and sexual transmission (measured through reports of risky sexual behavior) to orphan HIV infection. RESULTS: Our results suggest that maternal transmission is the predominant pathway of HIV infection among orphaned adolescents: there is strong evidence for a direct pathway from maternal (odds ratio [OR]: 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.72-3.51 for females and OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.53-3.90 for males) and double orphanhood (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.97-3.66 and OR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.68-3.82, respectively) to HIV; greater excess HIV risk in maternal versus paternal orphans. The contribution of sexual behavior is largely not significant. We do not observe correspondingly high orphan disparities in other sexually transmitted diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal transmission is a more likely explanation than sexual transmission for heightened HIV infection among orphans. These results suggest that programs designed to address HIV infection among adolescents should focus on reducing maternal transmission and on identifying and testing undiagnosed HIV among orphans.
Authors: Vinod Mishra; Martin Vaessen; J Ties Boerma; Fred Arnold; Ann Way; Bernard Barrere; Anne Cross; Rathavuth Hong; Jasbir Sangha Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Megan S Dunbar; M Catherine Maternowska; Mi-Suk J Kang; Susan M Laver; Imelda Mudekunye-Mahaka; Nancy S Padian Journal: J Prev Interv Community Date: 2010
Authors: Ayesha B M Kharsany; Cherie Cawood; David Khanyile; Lara Lewis; Anneke Grobler; Adrian Puren; Kaymarlin Govender; Gavin George; Sean Beckett; Natasha Samsunder; Savathree Madurai; Carlos Toledo; Zawadi Chipeta; Mary Glenshaw; Sara Hersey; Quarraisha Abdool Karim Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Isolde Birdthistle; Clare Tanton; Andrew Tomita; Kristen de Graaf; Susan B Schaffnit; Frank Tanser; Emma Slaymaker Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: John Charles; Amon Exavery; Amal Ally; Remmy Mseya; Tumainiel Mbwambo; Asheri Barankena; Christina Kyaruzi; Levina Kikoyo Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-07-28