| Literature DB >> 28362926 |
Patricia Walicke1, Aviva Abosch2, Anthony Asher3, Fred G Barker4, Zoher Ghogawala5, Robert Harbaugh6, Lara Jehi7, John Kestle8, Walter Koroshetz1, Roderick Little9, Donald Rubin10, Alex Valadka11, Stephen Wisniewski12, E Antonio Chiocca13.
Abstract
This workshop addressed challenges of clinical research in neurosurgery. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have high internal validity, but often insufficiently generalize to real-world practice. Observational studies are inclusive but often lack sufficient rigor. The workshop considered possible solutions, such as (1) statistical methods for demonstrating causality using observational data; (2) characteristics required of a registry supporting effectiveness research; (3) trial designs combining advantages of observational studies and RCTs; and (4) equipoise, an identified challenge for RCTs. In the future, advances in information technology potentially could lead to creation of a massive database where clinical data from all neurosurgeons are integrated and analyzed, ending the separation of clinical research and practice and leading to a new "science of practice."Entities:
Keywords: Clinical trials; Effectiveness research; Equipoise; Randomized controlled trial; Registry
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28362926 PMCID: PMC5808147 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosurgery ISSN: 0148-396X Impact factor: 4.654