Shibing Yang1, Charles B Eaton, Juan Lu, Kate L Lapane. 1. Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Division of Epidemiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed pharmacoepidemiologic studies published in 2012 that used inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimation of marginal structural models (MSM) to estimate the effect from a time-varying treatment. METHODS: Potential studies were retrieved through a citation search within Web of Science and a keyword search within PubMed. Eligibility of retrieved studies was independently assessed by at least two reviewers. One reviewer performed data extraction, and a senior epidemiologist confirmed the extracted information for all eligible studies. RESULTS: Twenty pharmacoepidemiologic studies were eligible for data extraction. The majority of reviewed studies did not report whether the positivity assumption was checked. Six studies performed intention-to-treat analyses, but none of them reported adherence levels after treatment initiation. Eight studies chose an as-treated analytic strategy, but only one of them reported modeling the multiphase of treatment use. Almost all studies performing as-treated analyses chose the most recent treatment status as the functional form of exposure in the outcome model. Nearly half of the studies reported that the IPW estimate was substantially different from the estimate derived from a standard regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IPW method to control for time-varying confounding is increasing in medical literature. However, reporting of the application of the technique is variable and suboptimal. It may be prudent to develop best practices in reporting complex methods in epidemiologic research.
PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed pharmacoepidemiologic studies published in 2012 that used inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimation of marginal structural models (MSM) to estimate the effect from a time-varying treatment. METHODS: Potential studies were retrieved through a citation search within Web of Science and a keyword search within PubMed. Eligibility of retrieved studies was independently assessed by at least two reviewers. One reviewer performed data extraction, and a senior epidemiologist confirmed the extracted information for all eligible studies. RESULTS: Twenty pharmacoepidemiologic studies were eligible for data extraction. The majority of reviewed studies did not report whether the positivity assumption was checked. Six studies performed intention-to-treat analyses, but none of them reported adherence levels after treatment initiation. Eight studies chose an as-treated analytic strategy, but only one of them reported modeling the multiphase of treatment use. Almost all studies performing as-treated analyses chose the most recent treatment status as the functional form of exposure in the outcome model. Nearly half of the studies reported that the IPW estimate was substantially different from the estimate derived from a standard regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IPW method to control for time-varying confounding is increasing in medical literature. However, reporting of the application of the technique is variable and suboptimal. It may be prudent to develop best practices in reporting complex methods in epidemiologic research.
Authors: Lauren E Cain; James M Robins; Emilie Lanoy; Roger Logan; Dominique Costagliola; Miguel A Hernán Journal: Int J Biostat Date: 2010 Impact factor: 0.968
Authors: Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-12-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Robert C Kalayjian; Bryan Lau; Rhoderick N Mechekano; Heidi M Crane; Benigno Rodriguez; Robert A Salata; Zipporah Krishnasami; James H Willig; Jeffrey N Martin; Richard D Moore; Joseph J Eron; Mari M Kitahata Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Elisabetta Patorno; Elizabeth M Garry; Amanda R Patrick; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Victoria G Gillet; Olesya Zorina; Dorothee B Bartels; John D Seeger Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Patricia Walicke; Aviva Abosch; Anthony Asher; Fred G Barker; Zoher Ghogawala; Robert Harbaugh; Lara Jehi; John Kestle; Walter Koroshetz; Roderick Little; Donald Rubin; Alex Valadka; Stephen Wisniewski; E Antonio Chiocca Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Catherine E de Keyser; Maarten J G Leening; Silvana A Romio; J Wouter Jukema; Albert Hofman; M Arfan Ikram; Oscar H Franco; Theo Stijnen; Bruno H Stricker Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Shao-Hsien Liu; Stavroula A Chrysanthopoulou; Qiuzhi Chang; Jacob N Hunnicutt; Kate L Lapane Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.178