Literature DB >> 12182772

The Brain Tumor Cooperative Group NIH Trial 87-01: a randomized comparison of surgery, external radiotherapy, and carmustine versus surgery, interstitial radiotherapy boost, external radiation therapy, and carmustine.

Robert G Selker1, William R Shapiro, Peter Burger, Margaret S Blackwood, Vincent C Arena, John C Gilder, Mark G Malkin, John J Mealey, John H Neal, Jeffrey Olson, James T Robertson, Gene H Barnett, Stephen Bloomfield, Robert Albright, Fred H Hochberg, Emile Hiesiger, Sylvan Green.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the Brain Tumor Cooperative Group NIH Trial 87-01 trial was to investigate the effect of additional implanted radiation therapy in newly diagnosed patients with pathologically confirmed malignant gliomas.
METHODS: The study involved a randomized comparison of surgery, external beam radiotherapy, and carmustine (BCNU) versus surgery, external beam therapy, interstitial radiotherapy boost, and BCNU in newly diagnosed malignant gliomas. (125)I was chosen as best suited for this effort because it allowed preimplantation planning and postimplantation quality assurance review. Two hundred ninety-nine patients met the eligibility criteria and were randomized into the two arms of the study between December 1987 and April 1994. Follow-up continued for an additional 3 years. Twenty-nine patients were identified as having committed protocol violations and were excluded, resulting in 270 subjects in the Valid Study Group. One hundred thirty-seven patients received external beam radiation and BCNU, and 133 underwent the (125)I implantation plus external beam radiation and BCNU therapy.
RESULTS: The overall median survival for the Valid Study Group was 64.3 weeks. The median survival for patients receiving additional therapy of (125)I was 68.1 weeks, and median survival for those receiving only external beam radiation and BCNU was 58.8 weeks. The cumulative proportion surviving between the two treatment groups was not statistically significantly different (log-rank test, P = 0.101). As in other studies in the literature, age, Karnofsky score, and pathology were predictors of mortality. Additional analyses incorporating an adjustment for these prognostic variables, either in a stratified analysis or Cox proportional hazards model, did not result in statistically significant differences in the cumulative proportion of patients surviving between the two treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is no long-term survival advantage of increased radiation dose with (125)I seeds in newly diagnosed glioma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12182772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  51 in total

1.  Simultaneous integrated vs. sequential boost in VMAT radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Mostafa Farzin; Michael Molls; Sabrina Astner; Ina-Christine Rondak; Markus Oechsner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Concurrent temozolomide and dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Christina I Tsien; Doris Brown; Daniel Normolle; Matthew Schipper; Morand Piert; Larry Junck; Jason Heth; Diana Gomez-Hassan; Randall K Ten Haken; Thomas Chenevert; Yue Cao; Theodore Lawrence
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: guidelines development, value and application.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Olson; Camilo E Fadul; Daniel J Brat; Srinivasan Mukundan; Timothy C Ryken
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Radiation therapy of pathologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults.

Authors:  John Buatti; Timothy C Ryken; Mark C Smith; Penny Sneed; John H Suh; Minesh Mehta; Jeffrey J Olson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Prognostic and therapeutic factors of gliosarcoma from a multi-institutional series.

Authors:  J Castelli; L Feuvret; Q C Haoming; J Biau; E Jouglar; A Berger; G Truc; F Llamas Gutierrez; X Morandi; P J Le Reste; F Thillays; D Loussouarn; E Nouhaud; G Crehange; D Antoni; E Vauleon; R de Crevoisier; G Noel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Irradiation of pediatric high-grade spinal cord tumors.

Authors:  Rahul D Tendulkar; Atmaram S Pai Panandiker; Shengjie Wu; Larry E Kun; Alberto Broniscer; Robert A Sanford; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Launching Effectiveness Research to Guide Practice in Neurosurgery: A National Institute Neurological Disorders and Stroke Workshop Report.

Authors:  Patricia Walicke; Aviva Abosch; Anthony Asher; Fred G Barker; Zoher Ghogawala; Robert Harbaugh; Lara Jehi; John Kestle; Walter Koroshetz; Roderick Little; Donald Rubin; Alex Valadka; Stephen Wisniewski; E Antonio Chiocca
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Controversies concerning the application of brachytherapy in central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Bo-Lin Liu; Jin-Xiang Cheng; Xiang Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Integrated-boost IMRT or 3-D-CRT using FET-PET based auto-contoured target volume delineation for glioblastoma multiforme--a dosimetric comparison.

Authors:  Marc D Piroth; Michael Pinkawa; Richard Holy; Gabriele Stoffels; Cengiz Demirel; Charbel Attieh; Hans J Kaiser; Karl J Langen; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Current available therapies and future directions in the treatment of malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Annick Desjardins; David A Reardon; James J Vredenburgh
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.