Literature DB >> 28361382

Pointing movements both impair and improve visuospatial working memory depending on serial position.

Clelia Rossi-Arnaud1, Emiddia Longobardi2, Pietro Spataro3.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effects of pointing movements on the item and order recall of random, horizontal, and vertical arrays consisting of 6 and 7 squares (Experiment 1) or 8 and 9 squares (Experiment 2). In the encoding phase, participants either viewed the items passively (passive-view condition) or pointed towards them (pointing condition). Then, after a brief interval, they were requested to recall the locations of the studied squares in the correct order of presentation. The critical result was that, for all types of arrays, the effects of the encoding condition varied as a function of serial position: for the initial and central positions accuracy was higher in the passive-view than in the pointing condition (confirming the standard inhibitory effect of pointing movements on visuospatial working memory), whereas the reverse pattern occurred in the final positions-showing a significant advantage of the pointing condition over the passive-view condition. Findings are interpreted as showing that pointing can have two simultaneous effects on the recall of spatial locations, a positive one due to the addition of a motor code and a negative one due to the attentional requirements of hand movements, with the net impact on serial recall depending on the amount of attention resources needed for the encoding of each position. Implications for the item-order hypothesis and the perceptual-gestural account of working memory are also discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pointing movements; Serial recall; Symmetry; Visuospatial working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28361382     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0704-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  39 in total

1.  The generation effect: dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

2.  Effects of pointing on the recall of simultaneous and sequential visuospatial arrays: a role for retrieval strategies?

Authors:  Clelia Rossi-Arnaud; Pietro Spataro; Emiddia Longobardi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-25

3.  Interference with visual short-term memory.

Authors:  R H Logie; G M Zucco; A D Baddeley
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-10

4.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.

Authors:  J S Nairne; G L Riegler; M Serra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Enactment effects and integration processes in younger and older adults' memory for actions.

Authors:  Pierre Feyereisen
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2009-02-17

6.  Rehearsal in immediate serial recall.

Authors:  Lydia Tan; Geoff Ward
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

7.  Memory as embodiment: The case of modality and serial short-term memory.

Authors:  Bill Macken; John C Taylor; Michail D Kozlov; Robert W Hughes; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-07-01

8.  Towards a clarification of spatial processing.

Authors:  J G Quinn
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1994-05

9.  Strategic grouping in the spatial span memory task.

Authors:  Diana Ridgeway
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-11

10.  Working memory task performance and chunking in early Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jonathan Huntley; Daniel Bor; Adam Hampshire; Adrian Owen; Robert Howard
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.319

View more
  1 in total

1.  On-item fixations during serial encoding do not affect spatial working memory.

Authors:  Stefan Czoschke; Sebastian Henschke; Elke B Lange
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.