Literature DB >> 28359769

Regular in-situ simulation training of paediatric Medical Emergency Team leads to sustained improvements in hospital response to deteriorating patients, improved outcomes in intensive care and financial savings.

Ulf Theilen1, Laura Fraser2, Patricia Jones3, Paul Leonard2, Dave Simpson2.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: The introduction of a paediatric Medical Emergency Team (pMET) was accompanied by weekly in-situ simulation team training. Key ward staff participated in team training, focusing on recognition of the deteriorating child, teamwork and early involvement of senior staff. Following an earlier study [1], this investigation aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of ongoing regular team training on hospital response to deteriorating ward patients, patient outcome and financial implications.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study of all deteriorating in-patients in a tertiary paediatric hospital requiring admission to paediatric intensive care (PICU) the year before, 1year after and 3 years after the introduction of pMET and team training.
RESULTS: Deteriorating patients were recognised more promptly (before/1year after/3years after pMET; median time 4/1.5/0.5h, p<0.001), more often reviewed by consultants (45%/76%/81%, p<0.001) and more rapidly escalated to PICU (median time 10.5/5/3.5h, p=0.02). There was a significant reduction in associated PICU admissions (56/51/32, p=0.02) and PICU bed days (527/336/193, p<0.001). The total annual cost of training (£74,250) was more than offset by savings from reduced PICU bed days (£801,600 per annum). Introduction of pMET coincided with significantly reduced hospital mortality (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that lessons learnt by ward staff during team training led to sustained improvements in the hospital response to critically deteriorating in-patients, significantly improved patient outcomes and substantial savings. Integration of regular in-situ simulation training of medical emergency teams, including key ward staff, in routine clinical care has potential application in all acute specialties.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human factors; In-situ simulation team training; Inclusion of ward staff; Intensive care outcomes; Mecial Emergency Team; Response to deteriorating patients; Return of investment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28359769     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  14 in total

1.  Simulation training programs for acute stroke care: Objectives and standards of methodology.

Authors:  Barbara Casolla; Maria Alonso de Leciñana; Raquel Neves; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Veronica Svobodova; Simon Jung; André Kemmling; Robert Mikulik; Paola Santalucia
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2020-11-01

2.  Responsive In-situ Simulation in Kids (RISK) project: a novel approach to learning from clinical incident reporting.

Authors:  Kate Knox; Nicola Baldwin; Claire Cadman; Olivia Davies; Leanne Goh; Rebecca Mortimer; Carol Stiles; Yasmin Baki; Sarah Eisen
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2019-09-19

3.  Multiprofessional perspectives on the identification of latent safety threats via in situ simulation: a prospective cohort pilot study.

Authors:  Daniel Rusiecki; Melanie Walker; Stuart L Douglas; Sharleen Hoffe; Timothy Chaplin
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-09-23

4.  In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Goldshtein; Cole Krensky; Sachin Doshi; Vsevolod S Perelman
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 5.  GENESISS 1-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a scoping review and conceptual model.

Authors:  Bryn Baxendale; Kerry Evans; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Guilia Miles; Alastair Ross; Eleanore Dring; Joanne Cooper
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.263

6.  In Situ Simulation for Adoption of New Technology to Improve Sepsis Care in Rural Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Emilie S Powell; William F Bond; Lisa T Barker; Kimberly Cooley; Julia Lee; Andrew L Vincent; John A Vozenilek
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.243

7.  Improving patient safety through better teamwork: how effective are different methods of simulation debriefing? Protocol for a pragmatic, prospective and randomised study.

Authors:  Julia Freytag; Fabian Stroben; Wolf E Hautz; Dorothea Eisenmann; Juliane E Kämmer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Team talk and team decision processes: a qualitative discourse analytical approach to 10 real-life medical emergency team encounters.

Authors:  Stine Gundrosen; Gøril Thomassen; Torben Wisborg; Petter Aadahl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  [Training together safely for our small and smallest patients].

Authors:  Lukas Mileder; Philipp Jung; Florian Hoffmann; Ellen Heimberg
Journal:  Monatsschr Kinderheilkd       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 0.323

10.  Community-based in situ simulation: bringing simulation to the masses.

Authors:  Barbara M Walsh; Marc A Auerbach; Marcie N Gawel; Linda L Brown; Bobbi J Byrne; Aaron Calhoun
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2019-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.