Literature DB >> 35514456

In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Daniel Goldshtein1, Cole Krensky2, Sachin Doshi2, Vsevolod S Perelman1,3,4.   

Abstract

Background: The use of in situ simulation has previously been shown to increase confidence, teamwork and practical skills of trained professionals. However, a direct benefit to patient outcomes has not been sufficiently explored. This review focuses on the effect of in situ simulation training in a hospital setting on morbidity or mortality.
Methods: A combined search was conducted in PUBMED, OVID, WEB OF SCIENCE, CINAHL, SCOPUS and EMBASE. 478 studies were screened with nine articles published between 2011 and 2017 meeting the inclusion criteria for analysis.
Results: This review selected eight prospective studies and one prospective-retrospective study. Three studies isolated in situ simulation as an experimental variable while the remaining studies implemented in situ programmes as a component of larger quality improvement initiatives. Seven studies demonstrated a significant improvement in morbidity and/or mortality outcomes following integrated in situ simulation training.
Conclusion: Existing literature, albeit limited, demonstrates that in situ training improves patient outcomes either in isolation or within a larger quality improvement programme. However, existing evidence contains difficulties such as isolating the impact of in situ training from various potential confounding factors and potential for publication bias. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical education; patient safety; simulation; team training

Year:  2019        PMID: 35514456      PMCID: PMC8936935          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  28 in total

1.  Didactic and simulation nontechnical skills team training to improve perinatal patient outcomes in a community hospital.

Authors:  William Riley; Stanley Davis; Kristi Miller; Helen Hansen; Francois Sainfort; Robert Sweet
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2011-08

Review 2.  Role of in-situ simulation for training in healthcare: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Viji Kurup; Veronica Matei; Jessica Ray
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.706

3.  Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes.

Authors:  I B Wilson; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A standardized Code Blue Team eliminates variable survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Sultana A Qureshi; Terence Ahern; Ryan O'Shea; Lorien Hatch; Sean O Henderson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  Simulation-based mock codes significantly correlate with improved pediatric patient cardiopulmonary arrest survival rates.

Authors:  Pamela Andreatta; Ernest Saxton; Maureen Thompson; Gail Annich
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Reduction in hospital mortality over time in a hospital without a pediatric medical emergency team: limitations of before-and-after study designs.

Authors:  Ari R Joffe; Natalie R Anton; Shauna C Burkholder
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-05

Review 7.  Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Ryan Brydges; Amy T Wang; David A Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing.

Authors:  Fatimah Lateef
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-10

9.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.

Authors:  Jonathan Ac Sterne; Miguel A Hernán; Barnaby C Reeves; Jelena Savović; Nancy D Berkman; Meera Viswanathan; David Henry; Douglas G Altman; Mohammed T Ansari; Isabelle Boutron; James R Carpenter; An-Wen Chan; Rachel Churchill; Jonathan J Deeks; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Jamie Kirkham; Peter Jüni; Yoon K Loke; Theresa D Pigott; Craig R Ramsay; Deborah Regidor; Hannah R Rothstein; Lakhbir Sandhu; Pasqualina L Santaguida; Holger J Schünemann; Beverly Shea; Ian Shrier; Peter Tugwell; Lucy Turner; Jeffrey C Valentine; Hugh Waddington; Elizabeth Waters; George A Wells; Penny F Whiting; Julian Pt Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-10-12

10.  Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation.

Authors:  Jette Led Sørensen; Doris Østergaard; Vicki LeBlanc; Bent Ottesen; Lars Konge; Peter Dieckmann; Cees Van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  GENESISS 1-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a scoping review and conceptual model.

Authors:  Bryn Baxendale; Kerry Evans; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Guilia Miles; Alastair Ross; Eleanore Dring; Joanne Cooper
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.263

2.  GENESISS 2-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a systematic mapping review.

Authors:  Kerry Evans; Jenny Woodruff; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Giulia Miles; Alastair Ross; Joanne Cooper; Bryn Baxendale
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Resuscitation simulation among people who are likely to witness opioid overdose: Experiences from the SOONER Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan P Whittall; Aaron M Orkin; Curtis Handford; Michelle Klaiman; Pamela Leece; Mercy Charles; Amy Wright; Suzanne Turner; Laurie J Morrison; Carol Strike; Douglas M Campbell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Learning team-based quality improvement in a virtual setting: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Einar Hovlid; Gunnar Husabø; Eivind Alexander Valestrand; Miriam Hartveit
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  In situ simulation training for a better interprofessional team performance in transferring critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective randomised control trial.

Authors:  Sidharta Kusuma Manggala; Aida Rosita Tantri; Adhrie Sugiarto; Imelda Rosalyn Sianipar; Theddeus Octavianus Hari Prasetyono
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.973

6.  Manikins versus simulated patients in emergency medicine training: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Jasmina Sterz; Niklas Gutenberger; Maria-Christina Stefanescu; Uwe Zinßer; Lena Bepler; Svea Linßen; Verena Schäfer; Patrick Carstensen; René Danilo Verboket; Farzin Adili; Miriam Ruesseler
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.374

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.