Literature DB >> 28358941

Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using quantitative phase imaging and machine learning.

Tan H Nguyen1, Shamira Sridharan1, Virgilia Macias2, Andre Kajdacsy-Balla2, Jonathan Melamed3, Minh N Do4, Gabriel Popescu1.   

Abstract

We present an approach for automatic diagnosis of tissue biopsies. Our methodology consists of a quantitative phase imaging tissue scanner and machine learning algorithms to process these data. We illustrate the performance by automatic Gleason grading of prostate specimens. The imaging system operates on the principle of interferometry and, as a result, reports on the nanoscale architecture of the unlabeled specimen. We use these data to train a random forest classifier to learn textural behaviors of prostate samples and classify each pixel in the image into different classes. Automatic diagnosis results were computed from the segmented regions. By combining morphological features with quantitative information from the glands and stroma, logistic regression was used to discriminate regions with Gleason grade 3 versus grade 4 cancer in prostatectomy tissue. The overall accuracy of this classification derived from a receiver operating curve was 82%, which is in the range of human error when interobserver variability is considered. We anticipate that our approach will provide a clinically objective and quantitative metric for Gleason grading, allowing us to corroborate results across instruments and laboratories and feed the computer algorithms for improved accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28358941     DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.3.036015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  23 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of cancer cell morphology and motility using telecentric digital holographic microscopy and machine learning.

Authors:  Van K Lam; Thanh C Nguyen; Byung M Chung; George Nehmetallah; Christopher B Raub
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Real-time halo correction in phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Mikhail E Kandel; Michael Fanous; Catherine Best-Popescu; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Machine Learning with Optical Phase Signatures for Phenotypic Profiling of Cell Lines.

Authors:  Van K Lam; Thanh Nguyen; Thuc Phan; Byung-Min Chung; George Nehmetallah; Christopher B Raub
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  Hyperspectral evaluation of vasculature in induced peritonitis mouse models.

Authors:  Jošt Stergar; Katja Lakota; Martina Perše; Matija Tomšič; Matija Milanič
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Spatial light interference microscopy: principle and applications to biomedicine.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Mikhail E Kandel; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  Adv Opt Photonics       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 24.750

6.  Quantitative phase imaging of stromal prognostic markers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Fanous; Adib Keikhosravi; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Kevin W Eliceiri; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Disorder strength measured by quantitative phase imaging as intrinsic cancer marker in fixed tissue biopsies.

Authors:  Masanori Takabayashi; Hassaan Majeed; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Epi-illumination gradient light interference microscopy for imaging opaque structures.

Authors:  Mikhail E Kandel; Chenfei Hu; Ghazal Naseri Kouzehgarani; Eunjung Min; Kathryn Michele Sullivan; Hyunjoon Kong; Jennifer M Li; Drew N Robson; Martha U Gillette; Catherine Best-Popescu; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Label-free quantitative evaluation of breast tissue using Spatial Light Interference Microscopy (SLIM).

Authors:  Hassaan Majeed; Tan Huu Nguyen; Mikhail Eugene Kandel; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Gabriel Popescu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Stable and discriminating features are predictive of cancer presence and Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-site study.

Authors:  Patrick Leo; Robin Elliott; Natalie N C Shih; Sanjay Gupta; Michael Feldman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.