Literature DB >> 28357787

Visual evaluation and differentiation of renal oncocytomas from renal cell carcinomas by means of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT.

Antonios Tzortzakakis1, Ove Gustafsson2,3, Mattias Karlsson4, Linnea Ekström-Ehn2, Rammin Ghaffarpour2, Rimma Axelsson3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the progress in the quality of multiphasic CT and MRI scans, it is still difficult to fully characterize a solid kidney lesion. Approximately 10% of all solid renal tumours turn out to be oncocytomas. In actual clinical practice, this is verified only following unnecessary surgery or a renal biopsy/ablation. The objective of our pilot study examines whether 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT can play a crucial role in the characterization of solid renal neoplasms and the differentiation of oncocytomas from renal cell carcinomas. The study included 27 patients identified with 31 solid renal lesions. All patients were discussed in a multidisciplinary conference, and a decision for surgery or biopsy was taken. Prior to invasive procedures, patients underwent a SPECT/CT with 99mTc-sestamibi. Visual evaluation was performed, and any focal 99mTc-sestamibi uptake detected on SPECT in the localisation of tumour was considered as positive.
RESULTS: Eleven out of 12 oncocytomas (91.6%) displayed positive uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi. Three hybrid tumours (mixed-type oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cancer) were positive on SPECT/CT. One papillary renal cell carcinoma had a slight uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi. The remaining 11 renal cell carcinomas were sestamibi negative.
CONCLUSIONS: Differentiation of benign renal oncocytomas from renal cell carcinomas seems very promising on 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT examination. Additional supplement to visual evaluation, i.e. quantitative tools, should be sought for an accurate estimate of biological behaviour and hence a secure diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  99mTc-sestamibi; Hybrid imaging; RCC; Renal oncocytomas; SPECT/CT

Year:  2017        PMID: 28357787      PMCID: PMC5371538          DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0278-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJNMMI Res            Impact factor:   3.138


Background

Approximately 1000 renal tumours are newly diagnosed in Sweden annually [1, 2] with 120 patients out of 250 patients within the Stockholm County being treated at Karolinska University Hospital for suspected renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RCCs account for nearly 2% of all adult cancers worldwide [3]. The most common RCC subtypes include clear cell, papillary and chromophobe RCC accounting for 70–80%, 14–17% and 4–8% of RCCs, respectively [4, 5]. However, the number of benign renal tumours, often preoperatively misclassified as potentially malignant, is not negligible since it varies from 10 up to 20% [6, 7]. In certain studies, the percentage of benign renal lesions at surgery is even higher reaching 27% [8]. The spectrum of benign renal lesions that can be mistaken for renal cell carcinomas encompasses renal oncocytoma, angiomyolipoma, metanephric adenoma and the infected/complicated renal cysts [8-10]. Renal oncocytomas are uncommon, but not rare tumours, since they constitute approximately 10% of all primary epithelial neoplasms of the adult kidney [11-13]. Oncocytomas can be mistaken for RCC on imaging grounds, accounting for 4–10% of nephrectomies performed for a suspected RCC [14]. The coincidence of oncocytoma with RCC is not infrequently encountered. In addition, renal oncocytomas can be multiple in 6% and bilateral in 5% and can develop metachronic tumours in 4% of the cases [15]. The detection rate of solid renal lesions might have increased based on MRI/multiphasic abdominal CT, but the preoperative differentiation of oncocytoma from RCC remains a diagnostic challenge even for an experienced abdominal radiologist [16-19]. Distinct radiological features such as stellate scars, contrast uptake patterns, measurements of fat content, DWI sequences or even subtraction techniques in MRI scans cannot really resolve the diagnostic challenge in a definite way [20-22]. Those diagnostic features are not only unspecific but also directly dependent on the imaging quality of the examination scan [17]. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of the aforementioned imaging modalities tends to be significantly lower in tumours with a diameter of ≤20 mm [23]. Renal oncocytoma is a unique neoplasm given its distinct intracytoplasmic content, i.e. numerous densely packed mitochondria [24]. Accordingly, a mitochondrial-imaging agent 99mTc-sestamibi could potentially trace oncocytomas arising in the kidneys. Based on this hypothesis, Gormley et al. concluded in 1996 that 99mTc-sestamibi imaging appeared to play a role as a non-invasive screening method [25]. Efforts for scintigraphic preoperative diagnosis of oncocytomas have been reported even earlier, with another imaging agent technetium 99m diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (Tc-99m DTPA) [26]. However, the rationale behind the use of this imaging agent with another mechanism of uptake was not strong enough to support further use of DTPA for this reason. In this context, recent work from Rowe and Gorin supported the potential role of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT in differentiating benign oncocytoma from RCC [27, 28]. Those last promising results encouraged our group to initiate this prospective pilot study by evaluating whether molecular imaging utilizing 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT could reliably differentiate between oncocytomas and RCCs.

Methods

Study design

The study was initiated following approval by the Regional Ethical Review Board and the local Radiation Safety Committee. A written informed consent was acquired from all patients who participated in our study. This explorative, non-randomised prospective study started in September 2015. Patients with T1 solid renal tumours, eligible for undergoing surgery or suitable for biopsy, were included. Exclusion criteria were defined as follows: T2+ tumours, tumours >7 cm in maximum diameter and/or patients with metastatic disease. Renal impairment was not an exclusion criterion. All patients were discussed in the kidney tumour conference at the Karolinska Department of Radiology at Huddinge, in order to fully characterize the lesions and examine the operability indications.

Image acquisition

SPECT/CT imaging was performed upon the injection of 925 ± 25 MBq 99mTc-sestamibi (produced by the National Centre for Nuclear Research, Poland; distributed by S. Ahlén Medical Nordic AB, Stockholm, Sweden), 1–4 days prior to surgical intervention or biopsy procedure. SPECT/CT imaging was initiated 60–90 min after the injection, on a Siemens Symbia T16 (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) system equipped with low-energy high-resolution collimators. SPECT imaging was performed with a 128 × 128 pixel matrix size (zoom factor 1) acquiring 64 projections in a step-and-shoot mode. Each projection was acquired during a 40-s time frame. Directly following the SPECT acquisition, a CT was performed, for the purpose of attenuation correction and anatomical correlation, using 130-kV tube voltage, 5-mm slice width and the automatic exposure control CARE Dose4D activated to provide proper tube current modulation, with a quality reference mAs setting of 10.

Reconstruction and evaluation

The SPECT and CT data were reconstructed with HERMES Hybrid Recon™ Oncology v.1.1B (HERMES Medical Solutions AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Two consultant radiologists, including an experienced nuclear medicine physician and an experienced abdominal radiologist, independently evaluated scintigraphic studies of the renal tumours without any prior knowledge of the histopathological diagnosis. Any focal 99mTc-sestamibi uptake detected on SPECT in the localisation of known tumour detected on CT was regarded as 99mTc-sestamibi positive (sestamibi+), whereas lesions with 99mTc-sestamibi uptake lower than normal renal parenchyma were considered to be 99mTc-sestamibi negative (sestamibi−).

Confirmation of diagnosis

All lesions were biopsied/operated upon with a histopathological diagnosis eligible for analysis.

Results

Between September 2015 and May 2016, 27 patients were included in the current study. One patient died due to other medical issues without any histopathological verification. Two patients had infected cysts that reduced in size verified on a CT control prior to surgery and therefore were not operated. In total, 24 patients were eligible for further analysis with altogether 31 solid renal tumours evaluated, since 4 patients had multiple bilateral renal lesions. Sixteen out of 31 lesions were resected whereas the rest were biopsied. The majority of the lesions had a size between 21 and 25 mm (Table 1). Despite the restrictions of SPECT/CT concerning accurate size measurements, it was easy to localize and measure the size of the kidney tumour with the help of previous CT studies that all patients had undergone.
Table 1

Size of renal tumours

Size (mm)Number of tumours
10–156
16–204
21–258
26–304
31–454
≥465
Size of renal tumours A complete agreement was reached collaboratively between two readers in evaluating tumours visually and classifying them into sestamibi+ and sestamibi−. Our cohort study contained 12 renal lesions that turned out to be oncocytomas, 11 of which were sestamibi+ (Fig. 1) and 1 sestamibi−. The last one was verified upon resection. In total, 7 out of 12 oncocytomas were verified histopathologically upon kidney resection. Three hybrid tumours (oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC) that were also resected exhibited 99mTc-sestamibi uptake. One angiomyolipoma displayed radioisotope uptake. Among 12 RCCs (7 clear cell RCCs, 3 papillary RCCs and 2 chromophobe RCCs), 11 were clearly sestamibi− (Fig. 2). Interestingly, 1 papillary RCC verified upon resection showed a slightly elevated uptake of radiotracer.
Fig. 1

The scintigraphic study (a) displays a coronal view of focal radioisotope uptake in the upper pole of right kidney (arrow). Anatomic correlation of the previous uptake (c) in the CT study, coronal view-venous phase. The coronal SPECT/CT fusion image (b) with sestamibi uptake in the same solid renal neoplasm (24 mm in maximum diameter) of the right kidney. This was subsequently diagnosed as renal oncocytoma on histopathological grounds

Fig. 2

Scintigraphic coronal view demonstrates the absence of radioisotope (arrow) in the upper part of left kidney (a). Preoperative CT study, venous phase in coronal view (c) of the same patient for anatomical correlation of the renal lesion. b Fused coronal SPECT/CT image with a solid renal neoplasm (28 mm in maximum diameter) of the left kidney without any sestamibi uptake. This was subsequently diagnosed as clear cell carcinoma on histopathological grounds

The scintigraphic study (a) displays a coronal view of focal radioisotope uptake in the upper pole of right kidney (arrow). Anatomic correlation of the previous uptake (c) in the CT study, coronal view-venous phase. The coronal SPECT/CT fusion image (b) with sestamibi uptake in the same solid renal neoplasm (24 mm in maximum diameter) of the right kidney. This was subsequently diagnosed as renal oncocytoma on histopathological grounds Scintigraphic coronal view demonstrates the absence of radioisotope (arrow) in the upper part of left kidney (a). Preoperative CT study, venous phase in coronal view (c) of the same patient for anatomical correlation of the renal lesion. b Fused coronal SPECT/CT image with a solid renal neoplasm (28 mm in maximum diameter) of the left kidney without any sestamibi uptake. This was subsequently diagnosed as clear cell carcinoma on histopathological grounds One patient with one collision tumour (chromophobe and papillary RCC) displayed no 99mTc-sestamibi uptake. Sestamibi− included 1 lymphoma and 1 metanephric adenoma (Table 2).
Table 2

Characteristics of 31 solid renal lesions in terms of sestamibi uptake

Type of lesionsNumber of lesionssestamibi positivesestamibi negative
Oncocytoma12 (39%)11 (91.6%)1 (8.4%)
Hybrid (oncocytoma-chromophobe RCC)3 (10%)3 (100%)0
Metanephric adenoma1 (3%)01 (100%)
Lymphoma1 (3%)01 (100%)
Angiomyolipoma1 (3%)1 (100%)0
Clear cell RCC7 (23%)07 (100%)
Papillary RCC3 (10%)1 (33.3%)2 (66.7%)
Chromophobe RCC2 (6%)02 (100%)
Collision (chromophobe-papillary RCC)1 (3%)01 (100%)

RCC renal cell carcinoma

Characteristics of 31 solid renal lesions in terms of sestamibi uptake RCC renal cell carcinoma

Discussion

99mTc-sestamibi is currently a well-established tracer for routine clinical investigations of myocardial perfusion and detection of parathyroid adenomas [29, 30]. Its mechanism of uptake is based on the tracer’s sequestration within the mitochondria of living cells, which can be applied as well on oncological imaging such as scintimammography [31]. As oncocytomas comprise neoplastic cells filled with numerous densely packed mitochondria, 99mTc-sestamibi appears to be a suitable tracer to diagnose and differentiate this benign renal neoplasm from malignant renal tumours. Based on tumour visual analysis, our data confirms the hypothesis that oncocytomas show uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi, which is in accordance with the aforementioned studies [25, 27, 28] with a high true positive rate. In this pilot study, 11 out of 12 oncocytomas were sestamibi+, resulting in a 91.6% sensitivity of the method. Similar high true positive rates have been reported previously from Rowe and Gorin [27, 28]. On histopathological grounds, the single oncocytoma that had no radioisotope uptake exhibited a cystic character with one third fibrous tissue. Further immunohistochemical analysis verified the oncocytic nature of the lesion according to the histopathological report. In our study, a patient turned out to have 3 sestamibi+ solid renal tumours bilaterally. The tumours proved to be hybrid oncocytic-chromophobe tumours after resection. Similar results about the behaviour of those hybrid tumours with oncocytic components showing sestamibi uptake have been reported from Gorin et al. [28]. Even if hybrid tumours were misdiagnosed as oncocytomas, there is no evidence of aggressive behaviour based on literature data. However, no report with a follow-up longer than 10 years has been published [32]. Another benign entity such as the solitary angiomyolipoma that our study includes exhibited sestamibi uptake. This behaviour, of no clinical consequence, is not in accordance with the results published from the scientific group from John Hopkins [28] since an angiomyolipoma was reported as sestamibi negative. Despite the above promising results, the main clinical question arising is what should be the management of false positive lesions, i.e. sestamibi+ papillary RCC?

Papillary renal cancer with sestamibi uptake

In our pilot study of 31 renal lesions, 1 sestamibi+ tumour turned out to be a papillary RCC. This was confirmed upon nephrectomy (International Society of Urological Pathology, ISUP nucleolar grade 2). Gorin et al. report false positive results as well [28] due to the presence of 2 chromophobe renal tumours with sestamibi uptake. Accordingly, a simple visual interpretation is inadequate for a secure diagnosis despite the fact that the sestamibi uptake of this papillary RCC was less intense compared to the uptake of oncocytomas and HOCTs. The false positive results raise the need of quantitative tools as an important supplement to visual evaluation. The quantitative analysis should be applied and evaluated before this method could be recommended for clinical practice.

Conclusions

There are clear benefits in the preoperative characterization of solid renal lesions using 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT as an aid to clinical evaluation and a detailed multiphasic CT examination. Solid renal lesions without uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi on SPECT/CT have most probably a malignant character and should be the subject of surgery. Renal lesions with positive 99mTc-sestamibi uptake are probably benign in nature. Were the surgery to be avoided in these patients, it would require an estimation of the consequences regarding the risk for false positive results. Even if this risk was low, it was not negligible in our small cohort of patients. The visual interpretation could be strengthened by application of quantitative tools. This should be evaluated before applying 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT in clinical routine.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Herbert T Cohen; Francis J McGovern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Immunohistochemical diagnosis of renal neoplasms.

Authors:  Luan D Truong; Steven S Shen
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Renal oncocytoma: a clinicopathological analysis of 45 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Tomas Gudbjartsson; Sverrir Hardarson; Vigdis Petursdottir; Asgeir Thoroddsen; Jonas Magnusson; Gudmundur V Einarsson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Sporadic hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor of the kidney: a clinicopathologic, histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular cytogenetic study of 14 cases.

Authors:  Fredrik Petersson; Zoran Gatalica; Petr Grossmann; Maria Delia Perez Montiel; Isabel Alvarado Cabrero; Stela Bulimbasic; Anthony Swatek; Lubomir Straka; Tomas Tichy; Milan Hora; Naoto Kuroda; Ben Legendre; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours.

Authors:  G Kovacs; M Akhtar; B J Beckwith; P Bugert; C S Cooper; B Delahunt; J N Eble; S Fleming; B Ljungberg; L J Medeiros; H Moch; V E Reuter; E Ritz; G Roos; D Schmidt; J R Srigley; S Störkel; E van den Berg; B Zbar
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 6.  DWI for Renal Mass Characterization: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Performance.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; Angela Zhang; Pari V Pandharipande; Hersh Chandarana; R Scott Braithwaite; Benjamin Littenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Prospective Evaluation of (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the Diagnosis of Renal Oncocytomas and Hybrid Oncocytic/Chromophobe Tumors.

Authors:  Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe; Alexander S Baras; Lilja B Solnes; Mark W Ball; Phillip M Pierorazio; Christian P Pavlovich; Jonathan I Epstein; Mehrbod S Javadi; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Frequency, clinical presentation and evolution of renal oncocytomas: multicentric experience from a European database.

Authors:  Leo Romis; Luca Cindolo; Jean Jacques Patard; Giovanni Messina; Vincenzo Altieri; Laurent Salomon; Claude Clement Abbou; Dominique Chopin; Bernard Lobel; Alexandre de La Taille
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Update on radiological imaging of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Deirdre M Coll; Robert C Smith
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Prevalence of sporadic renal angiomyolipoma: a retrospective analysis of 61,389 in- and out-patients.

Authors:  Astrid Fittschen; Inka Wendlik; Suemeyra Oeztuerk; Wolfgang Kratzer; Atilla S Akinli; Mark M Haenle; Tilmann Graeter
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-10
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the characterization of renal masses: a pictorial guide.

Authors:  Scott P Campbell; Antonios Tzortzakakis; Mehrbod S Javadi; Mattias Karlsson; Lilja B Solnes; Rimma Axelsson; Mohamad E Allaf; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Role of Virtual Biopsy in the Management of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Matthew S Davenport; Stuart G Silverman; Nicola Schieda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  A review of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for renal oncocytomas: A modified diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  Mitchell P Wilson; Prayash Katlariwala; Jonathan Abele; Gavin Low
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2022-05

Review 4.  The value of sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in differentiating and staging renal cell carcinomas: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abdalla Ali Deb; Ayman Agag; Naufal Naushad; Rajbabu Krishnamoorthy; Hosam Serag
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 5.  Characterizing Indeterminate Renal Masses with Molecular Imaging: the Role of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Andrew M Reynolds; Kristin Kelly Porter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Characterization of indeterminate renal masses with molecular imaging: how do we turn potential into reality?

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Mehrbod S Javadi; Mohamad E Allaf; Michael A Gorin
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 7.  Renal Oncocytoma: The Diagnostic Challenge to Unmask the Double of Renal Cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Trevisani; Matteo Floris; Roberto Minnei; Alessandra Cinque
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Correlation of 99mTc-sestamibi uptake in renal masses with mitochondrial content and multi-drug resistance pump expression.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Michael A Gorin; Lilja B Solnes; Mark W Ball; Ajuni Choudhary; Phillip M Pierorazio; Jonathan I Epstein; Mehrbod S Javadi; Mohamad E Allaf; Alex S Baras
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.138

9.  In Situ Metabolomics Expands the Spectrum of Renal Tumours Positive on 99mTc-sestamibi Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Examination.

Authors:  Thomas Papathomas; Antonios Tzortzakakis; Na Sun; Franziska Erlmeier; Annette Feuchtinger; Kiril Trpkov; Alina Bazarova; Alexandros Arvanitis; Wanzhong Wang; Bela Bozoky; Georgia Kokaraki; Rimma Axelsson; Axel Walch
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-11-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.