| Literature DB >> 28357348 |
Tom Den Abt1, Ben Souffriau1, Maria R Foulquié-Moreno1, Jorge Duitama2, Johan M Thevelein1.
Abstract
Isolation of mutants in populations of microorganisms has been a valuable tool in experimental genetics for decades. The main disadvantage, however, is the inability of isolating mutants in non-selectable polygenic traits. Most traits of organisms, however, are non-selectable and polygenic, including industrially important properties of microorganisms. The advent of powerful technologies for polygenic analysis of complex traits has allowed simultaneous identification of multiple causative mutations among many thousands of irrelevant mutations. We now show that this also applies to haploid strains of which the genome has been loaded with induced mutations so as to affect as many non-selectable, polygenic traits as possible. We have introduced about 900 mutations into single haploid yeast strains using multiple rounds of EMS mutagenesis, while maintaining the mating capacity required for genetic mapping. We screened the strains for defects in flavor production, an important non-selectable, polygenic trait in yeast alcoholic beverage production. A haploid strain with multiple induced mutations showing reduced ethyl acetate production in semi-anaerobic fermentation, was selected and the underlying quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were mapped using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis after crossing with an unrelated haploid strain. Reciprocal hemizygosity analysis and allele exchange identified PMA1 and CEM1 as causative mutant alleles and TPS1 as a causative genetic background allele. The case of CEM1 revealed that relevant mutations without observable effect in the haploid strain with multiple induced mutations (in this case due to defective mitochondria) can be identified by polygenic analysis as long as the mutations have an effect in part of the segregants (in this case those that regained fully functional mitochondria). Our results show that genomic saturation mutagenesis combined with complex trait polygenic analysis could be used successfully to identify causative alleles underlying many non-selectable, polygenic traits in small collections of haploid strains with multiple induced mutations.Entities:
Keywords: Mutant screen; QTL mapping; ethyl acetate production; flavor production; genetic basis; genomic mutagenesis; non-selectable trait; polygenic trait
Year: 2016 PMID: 28357348 PMCID: PMC5349090 DOI: 10.15698/mic2016.04.491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell ISSN: 2311-2638
Presence of the PMA1 and CEM1 alleles in 44 segregants of the TDA1(4)/S288c hybrid. The presence of the CEM1 or CEM1 and PMA1 or PMA1 alleles was assessed by Sanger sequencing in 44 segregants of the hybrid TDA1(4)/S288c strain. The level of ethyl acetate production in semi-anaerobic fermentations after 96 h is indicated for each segregant.
| 14s 26 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 11.6 ± 1.2 |
| 14s 14 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 12.9 ± 1.4 |
| 14s 23 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 13.8 ± 0.5 |
| 14s 10 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 13.9 ± 0.6 |
| 14s 4 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 14.9 ± 0.3 |
| 14s 3 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 15.7 ± 2.3 |
| 14s 32 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 15.9 ± 0.4 |
| 14s 37 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 16.0 ± 0.4 |
| 14s 39 | S288c | S288c | 16.2 ± 1.4 |
| 14s 5 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 17.5 ± 2.2 |
| 14s 8 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 17.6 ± 0.3 |
| 14s 21 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 18.0 ± 2.8 |
| 14s 18 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 18.4 ± 0.2 |
| 14s 33 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 19.0 ± 0.1 |
| 14s 19 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 19.2 ± 2.4 |
| 14s 31 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 19.4 ± 0.5 |
| 14s 35 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 19.5 ± 2.8 |
| 14s 15 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 19.5 ± 2.4 |
| 14s 44 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 19.7 ± 0.2 |
| 14s 27 | S288c | S288c | 19.9 ± 1.8 |
| 14s 6 | S288c | S288c | 20.0 ± 0.7 |
| 14s 7 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 21.0 ± 0.6 |
| 14s 42 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 21.0 ± 0.9 |
| 14s 9 | S288c | S288c | 21.2 ± 1.0 |
| 14s 24 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 21.4 ± 1.0 |
| 14s 1 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 22.4 ± 1.9 |
| 14s 25 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 22.8 ± 3.3 |
| 14s 43 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 23.0 ± 2.9 |
| 14s 30 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 23.3 ± 1.7 |
| 14s 34 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 23.6 ± 3.3 |
| 14s 17 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 23.8 ± 0.3 |
| 14s 11 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 24.1 ± 0.4 |
| 14s 12 | TDA1(4) | S288c | 25.4 ± 1.5 |
| 14s 40 | TDA1(4) | TDA1(4) | 25.7 ± 1.4 |
| 14s 28 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 27.9 ± 2.2 |
| 14s 2 | S288c | S288c | 28.2 ± 1.2 |
| 14s 41 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 28.2 ± 1.7 |
| 14s 38 | S288c | S288c | 30.0 ± 1.3 |
| 14s 13 | S288c | S288c | 30.5 ± 1.5 |
| 14s 16 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 30.5 ± 0.7 |
| 14s 29 | S288c | S288c | 30.8 ± 0.1 |
| 14s 22 | S288c | S288c | 32.3 ± 0.5 |
| 14s 20 | S288c | TDA1(4) | 34.1 ± 1.5 |
| 14s 36 | S288c | S288c | 37.0 ± 7.8 |
S. cerevisiae strains used in this study.
| S288c | ||
| S288c | Mating type switched S288c | This study |
| S288c 2n | Isogenic S288c diploid | This study |
| S288c
| This study | |
| BY4742 | This study | |
| ER7A | Segregant 7A of Ethanol Red, Matα | |
| (BY4741)
| ||
| (BY4741)
| ||
| (BY4741)
| ||
| (BY4741)
| ||
| (BY4742) | ||
| (BY4741)
| ||
| (BY4741)
| ||
| (BY4741)
|