| Literature DB >> 36073947 |
Ben Souffriau1,2,3, Sylvester Holt1,2, Arne Hagman1,2, Stijn De Graeve1,2, Philippe Malcorps3, Maria R Foulquié-Moreno1,2, Johan M Thevelein1,2.
Abstract
The introduction in modern breweries of tall cylindroconical fermentors, replacing the traditional open fermentation vats, unexpectedly revealed strong inhibition of flavor production by the high CO2 pressure in the fermentors. We have screened our collection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for strains displaying elevated tolerance to inhibition of flavor production by +0.65 bar CO2, using a laboratory scale CO2 pressurized fermentation system. We focused on the production of isoamyl acetate, a highly desirable flavor compound conferring fruity banana flavor in beer and other alcoholic beverages, from its precursor isoamyl alcohol (IAAc/Alc ratio). We selected the most tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain, saké yeast Kyokai no. 1, isolated a stable haploid segregant seg63 with the same high IAAc/Alc ratio under CO2 pressure, crossed seg63 with the unrelated inferior strain ER7A and phenotyped 185 haploid segregants, of which 28 displaying a high IAAc/Alc ratio were pooled. Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) by whole-genome sequence analysis based on SNP variant frequency revealed two QTLs. In the major QTL, reciprocal hemizygosity analysis identified MDS3 as the causative mutant gene, a putative member of the TOR signaling pathway. The MDS3Seg.63 allele was dominant and contained a single causative point mutation, T2171C, resulting in the F274S substitution. Introduction of MDS3Seg.63 in an industrial tetraploid lager yeast with CRISPR/Cas9 enhanced isoamyl acetate production by 145% under CO2 pressure. This work shows the strong potential of polygenic analysis and targeted genetic modification for creation of cisgenic industrial brewer's yeast strains with specifically improved traits. IMPORTANCE The upscaling of fermentation to very tall cylindroconical tanks is known to negatively impact beer flavor. Most notably, the increased CO2 pressure in such tanks compromises production by the yeast of the desirable fruity "banana" flavor (isoamyl acetate). The cause of the CO2 inhibition of yeast flavor production has always remained enigmatic. Our work has brought the first insight into its molecular-genetic basis and provides a specific gene tool for yeast strain improvement. We first identified a yeast strain with superior tolerance to CO2 inhibition of flavor production, and applied polygenic analysis to identify the responsible gene. We narrowed down the causative element to a single nucleotide difference, MDS3T2171C, and showed that it can be engineered into brewing yeast to obtain strains with superior flavor production in high CO2 pressure conditions, apparently without affecting other traits relevant for beer brewing. Alternatively, such a strain could be obtained through marker-assisted breeding.Entities:
Keywords: QTL analysis; acetate esters; alcohol acetyl transferase; carbon dioxide; flavor production; isoamyl acetate; isoamyl alcohol; yeast
Year: 2022 PMID: 36073947 PMCID: PMC9499027 DOI: 10.1128/aem.00814-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol ISSN: 0099-2240 Impact factor: 5.005
FIG 1Overview of experimental methods used in this study. (A) Lab-scale determination of the CO2 overpressure inhibition of acetate ester production (isoamyl acetate/alcohol ~AATase activity). (B) Mating and breeding segregants (offspring) with a range of CO2-inhibition of AATase activity, followed by selection of a pool of segregants with a superior acetate ester production profile. (C) Whole-genome sequence analysis of the superior pool and bioinformatic analysis to identify QTLs responsible for the trait. (D) Schematic representation of (Bulk) RHA as used to identify the causative gene in QTL 2. (E) Graphical overview of the 2 strategies and different plasmids used for CRISPR/Cas9 mediated MDS3 allele exchange.
FIG 2The lab-scale set-up for high CO2 pressure fermentation. (A) Scheme of the lab-scale high CO2 pressure fermentation system. (B) (C) (D) IAAc/Alc ratio after fermentation with 4 brewing yeast strains with and without extra CO2 pressure: (B). +0.50 bar, (C). +0.65 bar, and (D). +0.80 bar (E). Fermentation progress (apparent extract, in °Plato) with and without extra CO2 pressure (+0.65 bar). Strain JT28332 is an ale yeast and strains JT28333 to JT28335 are Frohberg lager yeasts.
FIG 3Screening for yeast strains producing superior IAAc/Alc ratios in high CO2 pressure fermentations. (A) Frequency distribution of the IAAc/Alc ratio in 200 preselected Saccharomyces strains obtained with gas chromatography analysis of fermentations in malt extract media under 0.65 bar extra CO2 pressure. The broken gray line indicates the cut-off for the 16 strains with the highest IAAc/Alc ratio (>0.06). (B) Scatterplot of isoamyl acetate and isoamyl alcohol levels produced in fermentations of malt extract medium, showing the resilience to extra CO2 pressure of the top 16 strains with the highest IAAc/Alc ratio. Filled circles indicate fermentations with 0.65 bar extra CO2 pressure and empty circles indicate fermentations without extra CO2 pressure. Dotted lines represent the average IAAc/Alc ratios (0.04, 0.06 and 0.08). The symbols of the selected superior strain, JT22329 (Kyokai no. 1) are shown in blue. (C) Residual maltose level after 4 days of fermentation in malt extract medium (15°P, non-aerated) for 120 segregants of strain JT22329 (Kyokai no. 1). The broken gray line indicates the 49 segregants with the lowest residual maltose level that were subsequently subjected to flavor profiling in pressurized beer fermentations. (D) Scatterplot of isoamyl acetate and isoamyl alcohol levels produced in 0.65 bar pressurized beer fermentations with maltose fermenting segregants of JT22329. Dotted lines represent the average IAAc/Alc ratios (0.04, 0.06 and 0.08). The symbol of the selected superior segregant is shown in blue and symbols of unrelated inferior haploid strains are indicated in red. Arrows indicate the selected superior segregant (Seg.63), the unrelated inferior haploid strain (ER7A) selected for mating, and the diploid parental strain (JT22329) for fermentations with and without extra CO2 pressure. (E) Frequency distribution of IAAc/Alc ratios obtained from gas chromatography analysis of fermentations in malt extract medium with 0.65 bar extra CO2 pressure for 185 haploid segregants of the hybrid diploid Seg.63/ER7A preselected for efficient maltose fermentation. The ratios have been normalized per fermentation batch to that of strain JT22329. The haploid parental strains, Seg.63 and ER7A, were included in each of the eight fermentation batches, and are shown on top with 10–90 percentile box plots. The broken gray line indicates the 100% cut-off for the 76 segregants selected for confirmation. (F) Confirmation and selection of the haploid segregants of Seg.63/ER7A showing the highest IAAc/Alc ratio. The ratios have been normalized per fermentation batch to that of strain JT22329. The dotted gray line indicates the 106% cut-off for the 28 segregants with the highest IAAc/Alc ratio, selected for the superior pool (shown in blue). The haploid parental strains, ER7A and Seg.63, included in each of the 6 batches, are shown in blue and red, respectively.
FIG 4QTL mapping by pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis for high IAAc/Alc ratio in CO2 pressurized fermentations. QTL mapping of (A) high IAAc/Alc ratio in CO2 pressurized fermentations and (B) lack of maltose fermentation. The regression line of the selected pools is shown in blue and that of the unselected maltose positive pool is shown in black. SNP variant frequency as percentage of that of the superior Seg.63 parent is shown in the upper panel while log10 linkage likelihood (LOD score) is shown in the lower panel, as a function of the S. cerevisiae S288c genome position. A threshold LOD score value of 3 has been used as cut-off for significance of the QTLs.
FIG 5Identification of MDS3 as the major causative gene in QTL2. QTL1 and QTL2 were the most strongly linked QTLs identified for superior IAAc/Alc ratio in fermentations under CO2 pressure. QTL1 was narrow, whereas QTL2 was broader, with the most-linked region (1-LOD interval) being 22.5 and 39 kb, respectively. To narrow down further the area in QTL2, we performed bulk RHA analysis with three blocks of genes. (A) Bulk RHA results for QTL2, identifying block 1 as causative. The position of the blocks is indicated on top. (B) To identify the causative genetic element in block 1 of QTL2, individual gene RHA was performed. Missense (single asterisk), and all combined promoter (P) and terminator (T) mutations are indicated for the genes in block 1. The significance indicated above the bars was determined with a Student's t test with correction for multiple testing with false discovery rate of 1%. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. The fermentations were carried out in quadruplicate with duplicate fermentations for each of two independent isolates.
FIG 6Allele replacement of the MDS3 gene in the parental strains. The causative effect of the MDS3 alleles isolated from the superior Seg.63 and inferior ER7A strain was confirmed by allele replacement using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. IAAc/Alc ratio in strains obtained by allele replacement in the Seg.63 and ER7A haploid parent strains (A) and in the Seg.63/ER7A hybrid diploid strain (B). Significance indicated above the bars was determined with a Student's t test with correction for multiple testing with false discovery rate of 1%. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. The fermentations were carried out in triplicate.
FIG 7Engineering of the MDS3Seg.63 allele into the tetraploid lager yeast JT28325. Allele replacement was performed with one or with all 4 alleles in a Frohberg type lager yeast. Significance indicated above the bars was determined with a Student's t test with correction for multiple testing with false discovery rate of 1%. *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01. The fermentations were carried out in triplicate with three independent transformants.
Overview of all missense SNPs in the MDS3 gene and the corresponding amino acid changes in Mds3
| Position in ORF | Amino acid change (ER7A > seg.63) | ER7A | SEG63 | JT28325 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 117 | E39D | A | C | C |
| 244 | T82A | A | G | G |
| 305 | T102M | C | T | C |
| 943 | K315E | A | G | G |
| 1033 | S345P | T | C | C |
| 1075 | H359Y | C | T | T |
| 1664 | F555S | T | C | C |
| 2171 | F724S | T | C | T |
| 3064 | T1022A | A | G | G |
| 3229 | I1077V | A | G | A |
The nucleotide position in the ORF, corresponding amino acid change, and nucleotide variant at that position are indicated for the inferior ER7A, superior Seg.63, and the JT28325 lager yeast. Shading indicates the three unique missense mutations in MDS3.
FIG 8Identification of F724S (T2171C) as the causative SNP variant in MDS3Seg.63. To identify the causative SNP(s) in the MDS3 gene, we reintroduced mutant alleles assembled from DNA fragments of MDS3 containing all possible combinations of SNPs. Significance of the difference with the ER7A reference strain indicated above the bars was determined with a One-way ANOVA test with Dunett’s correction for multiple testing. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. The fermentations were carried out in triplicate.
FIG 9SNP variants in QTL1. The most strongly linked area in QTL1 with the different genes and their mutations is indicated. Missense (single asterisk), and all combined promoter (P), terminator (T), and intron (I) mutations are indicated.
Yeast strains and plasmids used in this study
| Yeast strain | Description | Source and/or reference |
|---|---|---|
| Kyokai no. 1 | Industrial saké yeast; MAT | National Research Institute of Brewing, Japan |
| ER7A | Haploid segregant of Ethanol Red (industrial bioethanol strain), used for QTL analysis; MAT | MCB, KU Leuven ( |
| Seg.63 | Haploid segregant of Kyokai no. 1, used for QTL analysis; MAT | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | Hybrid diploid strain obtained by crossing ER7A and Seg.63 | This study |
| JT28332 | Ale yeast, | MCB, KU Leuven |
| JT28333 | Lager yeast; tetraploid | MCB, KU Leuven |
| JT28334 | Lager yeast; | MCB, KU Leuven |
| JT28335 | Lager yeast; | MCB, KU Leuven |
| JT28325 | Lager yeast; | MCB, KU Leuven |
| JT28325 | JT28325 with one out of four | This study |
| JT28325 | JT28325 with all four | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, | This study |
| Seg.63 | Haploid Seg.63, | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | Hybrid diploid ER7A/Seg.63, homozygous for | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | Hybrid diploid ER7A/Seg.63, homozygous for the | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, ER7A block 1 in QTL2 (chrVII: 116,059 to 129,161 bp) replaced with KanMX cassette | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, Seg.63 block 1 in QTL2 (chrVII: 129,884 to 147,394 bp) replaced with KanMX cassette | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, ER7A block 2 in QTL2 (chrVII: 129,884 to 147,394 bp) replaced with KanMX cassette | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, Seg.63 block 2 in QTL2 (chrVII: 129,884 to 161,219 bp) replaced with KanMX cassette | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, ER7A block 3 in QTL2 (chrVII: 148,232 to 165,084 bp) replaced with KanMX cassette | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, Seg.63 block 3 in QTL2 (chrVII: 148,232 to 165,084 bp) replaced with KanMX cassette | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | Hybrid diploid RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, | This study |
| ER7A/Seg.63 | Hybrid diploid RHA strain ER7A/Seg.63, | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, MDS3 allele knock-out with NatMX cassette flanked with G2 gRNA target sites | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, Gibson assembled | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, Gibson assembled | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, Gibson assembled | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, Gibson assembled | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, Gibson assembled | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, Gibson assembled | This study |
| ER7A | Haploid ER7A, Gibson assembled | This study |
| Plasmid | ||
| p414-TEF1p-Cas9-CYC1t | Cas9 expression plasmid |
|
| p426-SNR52p-gRNA. CAN1.Y-SUP4t | Guide RNA expression plasmid |
|
| pTEF-Cas9-KanMX | p414-TEF1p-Cas9-CYC1t with KanMX selection marker | This study |
| p426-sgRNA-HphMX | p426-SNR52p-gRNA. CAN1.Y-SUP4t with HphMX selection marker and EcoRV restriction flanking gRNA | This study |
| p426-sgRNA-NatMX | p426-SNR52p-gRNA. CAN1.Y-SUP4t with NatMX selection marker and EcoRV restriction flanking gRNA | This study |
| pJET-2xgRNA | pJET bacterial vector with -structural gRNA-SUP4t-SNR52p- for PCR amplification of constructs with two gRNAs | This study |
| p426- | Multicopy p426 donor plasmid (HphMX) with | This study |
| p426-sgRNA-2x | p426-SNR52p-gRNA. CAN1.Y-SUP4t with NatMX selection marker and expression of two gRNAs targeting | This study |
| p426-sgRNA-G2-HphMX | p426-SNR52p-gRNA. CAN1.Y-SUP4t with HphMX selection marker and expression of G2 gRNAs | This study |
| p426-sgRNA-G2-NatMX | p426-SNR52p-gRNA. CAN1.Y-SUP4t with NatMX selection marker and expression of G2 gRNAs | This study |