Alexander Andrea Tarnutzer1, Seung-Han Lee1, Karen A Robinson1, Zheyu Wang1, Jonathan A Edlow1, David E Newman-Toker2. 1. From the Department of Neurology (A.A.T.), University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (S.-H.L.), Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea; Departments of Medicine (K.A.R.), Neurology (D.E.N.-T.), and Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery (D.E.N.-T.), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Oncology and Department of Biostatistics (Z.W.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Department of Emergency Medicine (J.A.E.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 2. From the Department of Neurology (A.A.T.), University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology (S.-H.L.), Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea; Departments of Medicine (K.A.R.), Neurology (D.E.N.-T.), and Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery (D.E.N.-T.), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Oncology and Department of Biostatistics (Z.W.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; and Department of Emergency Medicine (J.A.E.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. toker@jhu.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: With the emergency department (ED) being a high-risk site for diagnostic errors, we sought to estimate ED diagnostic accuracy for identifying acute cerebrovascular events. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies (1995-2016) reporting ED diagnostic accuracy for ischemic stroke, TIA, or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Two independent reviewers determined inclusion. We identified 1,693 unique citations, examined 214 full articles, and analyzed 23 studies. Studies were rated on risk of bias (QUADAS-2). Diagnostic data were extracted. We prospectively defined clinical presentation subgroups to compare odds of misdiagnosis. RESULTS: Included studies reported on 15,721 patients. Studies were at low risk of bias. Overall sensitivity (91.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 90.7-92.0]) and specificity (92.7% [91.7-93.7]) for a cerebrovascular etiology was high, but there was significant variation based on clinical presentation. Misdiagnosis was more frequent among subgroups with milder (SAH with normal vs abnormal mental state; false-negative rate 23.8% vs 4.2%, odds ratio [OR] 7.03 [4.80-10.31]), nonspecific (dizziness vs motor findings; false-negative rate 39.4% vs 4.4%, OR 14.22 [9.76-20.74]), or transient (TIA vs ischemic stroke; false discovery rate 59.7% vs 11.7%, OR 11.21 [6.66-18.89]) symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Roughly 9% of cerebrovascular events are missed at initial ED presentation. Risk of misdiagnosis is much greater when presenting neurologic complaints are mild, nonspecific, or transient (range 24%-60%). This difference suggests that many misdiagnoses relate to symptom-specific factors. Future research should emphasize studying causes and designing error-reduction strategies in symptom-specific subgroups at greatest risk of misdiagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: With the emergency department (ED) being a high-risk site for diagnostic errors, we sought to estimate ED diagnostic accuracy for identifying acute cerebrovascular events. METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies (1995-2016) reporting ED diagnostic accuracy for ischemic stroke, TIA, or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Two independent reviewers determined inclusion. We identified 1,693 unique citations, examined 214 full articles, and analyzed 23 studies. Studies were rated on risk of bias (QUADAS-2). Diagnostic data were extracted. We prospectively defined clinical presentation subgroups to compare odds of misdiagnosis. RESULTS: Included studies reported on 15,721 patients. Studies were at low risk of bias. Overall sensitivity (91.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 90.7-92.0]) and specificity (92.7% [91.7-93.7]) for a cerebrovascular etiology was high, but there was significant variation based on clinical presentation. Misdiagnosis was more frequent among subgroups with milder (SAH with normal vs abnormal mental state; false-negative rate 23.8% vs 4.2%, odds ratio [OR] 7.03 [4.80-10.31]), nonspecific (dizziness vs motor findings; false-negative rate 39.4% vs 4.4%, OR 14.22 [9.76-20.74]), or transient (TIA vs ischemic stroke; false discovery rate 59.7% vs 11.7%, OR 11.21 [6.66-18.89]) symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Roughly 9% of cerebrovascular events are missed at initial ED presentation. Risk of misdiagnosis is much greater when presenting neurologic complaints are mild, nonspecific, or transient (range 24%-60%). This difference suggests that many misdiagnoses relate to symptom-specific factors. Future research should emphasize studying causes and designing error-reduction strategies in symptom-specific subgroups at greatest risk of misdiagnosis.
Authors: J H Pope; T P Aufderheide; R Ruthazer; R H Woolard; J A Feldman; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; H P Selker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-04-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert G Kowalski; Jan Claassen; Kurt T Kreiter; Joseph E Bates; Noeleen D Ostapkovich; E Sander Connolly; Stephan A Mayer Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-02-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: L B Morgenstern; L D Lisabeth; A C Mecozzi; M A Smith; P J Longwell; D A McFarling; J M H Risser Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-03-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Shelagh B Coutts; Francois Moreau; Negar Asdaghi; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Marie-Christine Camden; Bruce C V Campbell; Andrew M Demchuk; Thalia S Field; Mayank Goyal; Martin Krause; Jennifer Mandzia; Bijoy K Menon; Robert Mikulik; Andrew M Penn; Richard H Swartz; Michael D Hill Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Ali S Saber Tehrani; Jorge C Kattah; Kevin A Kerber; Daniel R Gold; David S Zee; Victor C Urrutia; David E Newman-Toker Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Amy Y X Yu; Michael D Hill; Negar Asdaghi; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Marie-Christine Camden; Bruce C V Campbell; Andrew M Demchuk; Thalia S Field; Mayank Goyal; Martin Krause; Jennifer Mandzia; Bijoy K Menon; Robert Mikulik; Francois Moreau; Andrew M Penn; Richard H Swartz; Shelagh B Coutts Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marc B Rosenman; Elissa Oh; Christopher T Richards; Scott Mendelson; Julia Lee; Jane L Holl; Andrew M Naidech; Shyam Prabhakaran Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2020-04
Authors: Ava L Liberman; Ahmed Hassoon; Mehdi Fanai; Shervin Badihian; Hetal Rupani; Susan M Peterson; Krisztian Sebestyen; Zheyu Wang; Yuxin Zhu; Richard B Lipton; David E Newman-Toker Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 3.451