Jonathan A Edlow1, Kiersten L Gurley2, David E Newman-Toker3. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 3. Division of Neuro-Visual and Vestibular Disorders, Department of Neurology, Otolaryngology, and Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dizziness, a common chief complaint, has an extensive differential diagnosis that includes both benign and serious conditions. Emergency physicians must distinguish the majority of patients with self-limiting conditions from those with serious illnesses that require acute treatment. OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW: This article presents a new approach to diagnosis of the acutely dizzy patient that emphasizes different aspects of the history to guide a focused physical examination with the goal of differentiating benign peripheral vestibular conditions from dangerous posterior circulation strokes in the emergency department. DISCUSSION: Currently, misdiagnoses are frequent and diagnostic testing costs are high. This relates in part to use of an outdated, prevalent, diagnostic paradigm. The traditional approach, which relies on dizziness symptom quality or type (i.e., vertigo, presyncope, or disequilibrium) to guide inquiry, does not distinguish benign from dangerous causes, and is inconsistent with current best evidence. A new approach divides patients into three key categories using timing and triggers, guiding a differential diagnosis and targeted bedside examination protocol: 1) acute vestibular syndrome, where bedside physical examination differentiates vestibular neuritis from stroke; 2) spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome, where associated symptoms help differentiate vestibular migraine from transient ischemic attack; and 3) triggered episodic vestibular syndrome, where the Dix-Hallpike and supine roll test help differentiate benign paroxysmal positional vertigo from posterior fossa structural lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The timing and triggers diagnostic approach for the acutely dizzy patient derives from current best evidence and offers the potential to reduce misdiagnosis while simultaneously decreases diagnostic test overuse, unnecessary hospitalization, and incorrect treatments.
BACKGROUND:Dizziness, a common chief complaint, has an extensive differential diagnosis that includes both benign and serious conditions. Emergency physicians must distinguish the majority of patients with self-limiting conditions from those with serious illnesses that require acute treatment. OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW: This article presents a new approach to diagnosis of the acutely dizzy patient that emphasizes different aspects of the history to guide a focused physical examination with the goal of differentiating benign peripheral vestibular conditions from dangerous posterior circulation strokes in the emergency department. DISCUSSION: Currently, misdiagnoses are frequent and diagnostic testing costs are high. This relates in part to use of an outdated, prevalent, diagnostic paradigm. The traditional approach, which relies on dizziness symptom quality or type (i.e., vertigo, presyncope, or disequilibrium) to guide inquiry, does not distinguish benign from dangerous causes, and is inconsistent with current best evidence. A new approach divides patients into three key categories using timing and triggers, guiding a differential diagnosis and targeted bedside examination protocol: 1) acute vestibular syndrome, where bedside physical examination differentiates vestibular neuritis from stroke; 2) spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome, where associated symptoms help differentiate vestibular migraine from transient ischemic attack; and 3) triggered episodic vestibular syndrome, where the Dix-Hallpike and supine roll test help differentiate benign paroxysmal positional vertigo from posterior fossa structural lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The timing and triggers diagnostic approach for the acutely dizzy patient derives from current best evidence and offers the potential to reduce misdiagnosis while simultaneously decreases diagnostic test overuse, unnecessary hospitalization, and incorrect treatments.
Authors: Babak B Navi; Hooman Kamel; Maulik P Shah; Aaron W Grossman; Christine Wong; Sharon N Poisson; William D Whetstone; S Andrew Josephson; S Claiborne Johnston; Anthony S Kim Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Kevin A Kerber; William J Meurer; Devin L Brown; James F Burke; Timothy P Hofer; Alexander Tsodikov; Ellen G Hoeffner; A M Fendrick; Eric E Adelman; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Vincent A van Vugt; Gülsün Bas; Johannes C van der Wouden; Jacquelien Dros; Henk C P M van Weert; Lucy Yardley; Jos W R Twisk; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Otto R Maarsingh Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Vincent A van Vugt; Judith E Bosmans; Aureliano P Finch; Johannes C van der Wouden; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Otto R Maarsingh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Vincent A van Vugt; Martijn W Heymans; Johannes C van der Wouden; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Otto R Maarsingh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Martin Müller; Martina B Goeldlin; Janika Gaschen; Thomas C Sauter; Stephanie Stock; Franca Wagner; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Urs Fischer; Roger Kalla; Georgios Mantokoudis Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2020-08-31
Authors: Vincent A van Vugt; Anja JThCM de Kruif; Johannes C van der Wouden; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Otto R Maarsingh Journal: BJGP Open Date: 2020-12-15