Marc B Rosenman1, Elissa Oh1, Christopher T Richards1, Scott Mendelson1, Julia Lee1, Jane L Holl1, Andrew M Naidech1, Shyam Prabhakaran1. 1. Department of Pediatrics (MRB, JLH), Northwestern University and Lurie Children's Hospital; Center for Healthcare Studies (EO, CTR, SM, JLH, AMN); Department of Emergency Medicine (CTR); Department of Neurology (SM, AMN), Department of Preventive Medicine (JL), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; and Department of Neurology (SP), University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of subsequent stroke among older patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) without a diagnosis of TIA or stroke. METHODS: Using electronic health record data from a large urban, university hospital and a community-based hospital, we analyzed patients aged 60-89 years discharged to home from the ED without an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th or 10th Revision diagnosis of TIA or stroke. Based on the presence/absence of a head CT and the presence/absence of a chief complaint suggestive of TIA or stroke ("symptoms") during the index ED visit, we created 4 mutually exclusive groups (group 1, reference: head CT no, symptoms no; group 2: head CT no, symptoms yes; group 3: head CT yes, symptoms no; and group 4: head CT yes, symptoms yes). We calculated rates of stroke in the 30, 90, and 365 days after the index visit and used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for subsequent stroke. RESULTS: Among 35,622 patients (mean age 70 years, 59% women, and 16% African American), unadjusted rates of stroke in 365 days were as follows: group 4: 2.5%; group 3: 1.1%; group 2: 0.69%; and group 1: 0.54%. The adjusted OR for stroke was 3.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-6.76) in group 4, 1.56 (95% CI, 1.16-2.09) in group 3, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.22-1.67) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients discharged from the ED without a diagnosis of TIA or stroke, the occurrence of a head CT and/or specific neurologic symptoms established a clinically meaningful risk gradient for subsequent stroke.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of subsequent stroke among older patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) without a diagnosis of TIA or stroke. METHODS: Using electronic health record data from a large urban, university hospital and a community-based hospital, we analyzed patients aged 60-89 years discharged to home from the ED without an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th or 10th Revision diagnosis of TIA or stroke. Based on the presence/absence of a head CT and the presence/absence of a chief complaint suggestive of TIA or stroke ("symptoms") during the index ED visit, we created 4 mutually exclusive groups (group 1, reference: head CT no, symptoms no; group 2: head CT no, symptoms yes; group 3: head CT yes, symptoms no; and group 4: head CT yes, symptoms yes). We calculated rates of stroke in the 30, 90, and 365 days after the index visit and used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for subsequent stroke. RESULTS: Among 35,622 patients (mean age 70 years, 59% women, and 16% African American), unadjusted rates of stroke in 365 days were as follows: group 4: 2.5%; group 3: 1.1%; group 2: 0.69%; and group 1: 0.54%. The adjusted OR for stroke was 3.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-6.76) in group 4, 1.56 (95% CI, 1.16-2.09) in group 3, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.22-1.67) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients discharged from the ED without a diagnosis of TIA or stroke, the occurrence of a head CT and/or specific neurologic symptoms established a clinically meaningful risk gradient for subsequent stroke.
Authors: Marc Rosenman; Jinghua He; Joel Martin; Kavitha Nutakki; George Eckert; Kathleen Lane; Irmina Gradus-Pizlo; Siu L Hui Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Anthony S Kim; Stephen Sidney; Allan L Bernstein; Vanja C Douglas; S Claiborne Johnston Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Philippa C Lavallée; Elena Meseguer; Halim Abboud; Lucie Cabrejo; Jean-Marc Olivot; Olivier Simon; Mikael Mazighi; Chantal Nifle; Philippe Niclot; Bertrand Lapergue; Isabelle F Klein; Eric Brochet; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Guy Lesèche; Julien Labreuche; Pierre-Jean Touboul; Pierre Amarenco Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: J Donald Easton; Jeffrey L Saver; Gregory W Albers; Mark J Alberts; Seemant Chaturvedi; Edward Feldmann; Thomas S Hatsukami; Randall T Higashida; S Claiborne Johnston; Chelsea S Kidwell; Helmi L Lutsep; Elaine Miller; Ralph L Sacco Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: K O Lövblad; H J Laubach; A E Baird; F Curtin; G Schlaug; R R Edelman; S Warach Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1998 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andrew Wilson; Dawn Coleby; Emma Regen; Kay Phelps; Kate Windridge; Janet Willars; Tom Robinson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 2.692