Literature DB >> 28355039

Elevated vacuum suspension preserves residual-limb skin health in people with lower-limb amputation: Randomized clinical trial.

Cameron Rink1, Matthew M Wernke2, Heather M Powell3, Surya Gynawali1, Ryan M Schroeder2, Jayne Y Kim3, Jeffrey A Denune2, Gayle M Gordillo1,4, James M Colvin2, Chandan K Sen1.   

Abstract

A growing number of clinical trials and case reports support qualitative claims that use of an elevated vacuum suspension (EVS) prosthesis improves residual-limb health on the basis of self-reported questionnaires, clinical outcomes scales, and wound closure studies. Here, we report first efforts to quantitatively assess residual-limb circulation in response to EVS. Residual-limb skin health and perfusion of people with lower-limb amputation (N = 10) were assessed during a randomized crossover study comparing EVS with nonelevated vacuum suspension (control) over a 32 wk period using noninvasive probes (transepidermal water loss, laser speckle imaging, transcutaneous oxygen measurement) and functional hyperspectral imaging approaches. Regardless of the suspension system, prosthesis donning decreased perfusion in the residual limb under resting conditions. After 16 wk of use, EVS improved residual-limb oxygenation during treadmill walking. Likewise, prosthesis-induced reactive hyperemia was attenuated with EVS following 16 wk of use. Skin barrier function was preserved with EVS but disrupted after control socket use. Taken together, outcomes suggest chronic EVS use improves perfusion and preserves skin barrier function in people with lower-limb amputation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; "Evaluation of limb health associated with a prosthetic vacuum socket system": NCT01839123; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01839123?term=NCT01839123&rank=1.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amputation; elevated socket suspension; perfusion; prosthesis; residual limb; socket; suspension; transfemoral; transtibial; vacuum

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28355039     DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.07.0145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  6 in total

1.  Progress Toward Optimizing Prosthetic Socket Fit and Suspension Using Elevated Vacuum to Promote Residual Limb Health.

Authors:  Matthew M Wernke; Ryan M Schroeder; Michael L Haynes; Lonnie L Nolt; Alexander W Albury; James M Colvin
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Standardized Approach to Quantitatively Measure Residual Limb Skin Health in Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation.

Authors:  Cameron L Rink; Matthew M Wernke; Heather M Powell; Mark Tornero; Surya C Gnyawali; Ryan M Schroeder; Jayne Y Kim; Jeffrey A Denune; Alexander W Albury; Gayle M Gordillo; James M Colvin; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Hyperspectral imaging in wound care: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gennadi Saiko; Phoebe Lombardi; Yunghan Au; Douglas Queen; David Armstrong; Keith Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Modeling the mechanics of elevated vacuum systems in prosthetic sockets.

Authors:  Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; Joseph M Czerniecki; Jacob T Brzostowski; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Performance of an auto-adjusting prosthetic socket during walking with intermittent socket release.

Authors:  Ethan J Weathersby; Andrew C Vamos; Brian G Larsen; Jake B McLean; Ryan V Carter; Katheryn J Allyn; Daniel Ballesteros; Horace Wang; Nicholas S deGrasse; Janna L Friedly; Brian J Hafner; Joseph L Garbini; Marcia A Ciol; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2022-04-28

6.  Real time monitoring of transtibial elevated vacuum prostheses: A case series on socket air pressure.

Authors:  Katherine R Schoepp; Jonathon S Schofield; David Home; Michael R Dawson; Edmond Lou; McNiel Keri; Paul D Marasco; Jacqueline S Hebert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.