Literature DB >> 28736683

Progress Toward Optimizing Prosthetic Socket Fit and Suspension Using Elevated Vacuum to Promote Residual Limb Health.

Matthew M Wernke1, Ryan M Schroeder1, Michael L Haynes1, Lonnie L Nolt1, Alexander W Albury1, James M Colvin1.   

Abstract

Objective: Prosthetic sockets are custom made for each amputee, yet there are no quantitative tools to determine the appropriateness of socket fit. Ensuring a proper socket fit can have significant effects on the health of residual limb soft tissues and overall function and acceptance of the prosthetic limb. Previous work found that elevated vacuum pressure data can detect movement between the residual limb and the prosthetic socket; however, the correlation between the two was specific to each user. The overall objective of this work is to determine the relationship between elevated vacuum pressure deviations and prosthetic socket fit. Approach: A tension compression machine was used to apply repeated controlled forces onto a residual limb model with sockets of different internal volume.
Results: The vacuum pressure-displacement relationship was dependent on socket fit. The vacuum pressure data were sensitive enough to detect differences of 1.5% global volume and can likely detect differences even smaller. Limb motion was reduced as surface area of contact between the limb model and socket was maximized. Innovation: The results suggest that elevated vacuum pressure data provide information to quantify socket fit. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the use of elevated vacuum pressure data may provide a method for prosthetists to quantify and monitor socket fit. Future studies should investigate the relationship between socket fit, limb motion, and limb health to define optimal socket fit parameters.

Keywords:  Boyle's Law; displacement; pistoning; prosthetic interface

Year:  2017        PMID: 28736683      PMCID: PMC5512305          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2016.0719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions.

Authors:  W J Board; G M Street; C Caspers
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Walking in a vacuum-assisted socket shifts the stump fluid balance.

Authors:  J Goswami; R Lynn; G Street; M Harlander
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Residual limb wounds or ulcers heal in transtibial amputees using an active suction socket system. A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  M Traballesi; A S Delussu; A Fusco; M Iosa; T Averna; R Pellegrini; S Brunelli
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  Strength evaluation of prosthetic check sockets, copolymer sockets, and definitive laminated sockets.

Authors:  Maria J Gerschutz; Michael L Haynes; Derek Nixon; James M Colvin
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

5.  Elevated vacuum suspension preserves residual-limb skin health in people with lower-limb amputation: Randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Cameron Rink; Matthew M Wernke; Heather M Powell; Surya Gynawali; Ryan M Schroeder; Jayne Y Kim; Jeffrey A Denune; Gayle M Gordillo; James M Colvin; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2016

6.  The benefits of using a vacuum-assisted socket system to improve balance and gait in elderly transtibial amputees.

Authors:  C Beatriz Samitier; Lluis Guirao; Maria Costea; Josep M Camós; Eulogio Pleguezuelos
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Darter; Kirill Sinitski; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Effects of elevated vacuum on in-socket residual limb fluid volume: case study results using bioimpedance analysis.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

9.  Consequences of non-vascular trans-femoral amputation: a survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems.

Authors:  K Hagberg; R Brånemark
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees.

Authors:  Henk E Meulenbelt; Jan H Geertzen; Marcel F Jonkman; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.966

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Textile-based Pressure Sensors for Monitoring Prosthetic-Socket Interfaces.

Authors:  Jordan Tabor; Talha Agcayazi; Aaron Fleming; Brendan Thompson; Ashish Kapoor; Ming Liu; Michael Lee; He Helen Huang; Alper Bozkurt; Tushar Ghosh
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.301

2.  Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alix Chadwell; Laura Diment; M Micó-Amigo; Dafne Z Morgado Ramírez; Alex Dickinson; Malcolm Granat; Laurence Kenney; Sisary Kheng; Mohammad Sobuh; Robert Ssekitoleko; Peter Worsley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Using mechanical testing to assess texturing of prosthetic sockets to improve suspension in the transverse plane and reduce rotation.

Authors:  Julia Quinlan; Vasanth Subramanian; Jessica Yohay; Brad Poziembo; Stefania Fatone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Systematic Experimental Assessment of a 2D-Motion Sensor to Detect Relative Movement between Residual Limb and Prosthetic Socket.

Authors:  Veronika Noll; Stephan Rinderknecht; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  William Anderst; Goeran Fiedler; Kentaro Onishi; Gina McKernan; Tom Gale; Paige Paulus
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  The Impact of Limited Prosthetic Socket Documentation: A Researcher Perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer Olsen; Shruti Turner; Alix Chadwell; Alex Dickinson; Chantel Ostler; Lucy Armitage; Alison H McGregor; Sigrid Dupan; Sarah Day
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-03-07

7.  Real time monitoring of transtibial elevated vacuum prostheses: A case series on socket air pressure.

Authors:  Katherine R Schoepp; Jonathon S Schofield; David Home; Michael R Dawson; Edmond Lou; McNiel Keri; Paul D Marasco; Jacqueline S Hebert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.