Literature DB >> 28353408

Characterization of Small Focal Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Accuracy with Single-Phase Contrast-enhanced Dual-Energy CT with Material Attenuation Analysis Compared with Conventional Attenuation Measurements.

Daniele Marin1, Drew Davis1, Kingshuk Roy Choudhury1, Bhavik Patel1, Rajan T Gupta1, Achille Mileto1, Rendon C Nelson1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether single-phase contrast material-enhanced dual-energy material attenuation analysis improves the characterization of small (1-4 cm) renal lesions compared with conventional attenuation measurements by using histopathologic analysis and follow-up imaging as the clinical reference standards. Materials and Methods In this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, 136 consecutive patients (95 men and 41 women; mean age, 54 years) with 144 renal lesions (111 benign, 33 malignant) measuring 1-4 cm underwent single-energy unenhanced and contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen. For each renal lesion, attenuation measurements were obtained; attenuation change of greater than or equal to 15 HU was considered evidence of enhancement. Dual-energy attenuation measurements were also obtained by using iodine-water, water-iodine, calcium-water, and water-calcium material basis pairs. Mean lesion attenuation values and material densities were compared between benign and malignant renal lesions by using the two-sample t test. Diagnostic accuracy of attenuation measurements and dual-energy material densities was assessed and validated by using 10-fold cross-validation to limit the effect of optimistic bias. Results By using cross-validated optimal thresholds at 100% sensitivity, iodine-water material attenuation images significantly improved specificity for differentiating between benign and malignant renal lesions compared with conventional enhancement measurements (93% [103 of 111]; 95% confidence interval: 86%, 97%; vs 81% [90 of 111]; 95% confidence interval: 73%, 88%) (P = .02). Sensitivity with iodine-water and calcium-water material attenuation images was also higher than that with conventional enhancement measurements, although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT with material attenuation analysis improves specificity for characterization of small (1-4 cm) renal lesions compared with conventional attenuation measurements. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28353408     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

Review 1.  Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: Can we make the diagnosis using CT and MRI?

Authors:  Robert S Lim; Trevor A Flood; Matthew D F McInnes; Luke T Lavallee; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization.

Authors:  Ali Pourvaziri; Anushri Parakh; Amirkasra Mojtahed; Avinash Kambadakone; Dushyant Vasudeo Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Can virtual monochromatic images from dual-energy CT replace low-kVp images for abdominal contrast-enhanced CT in small- and medium-sized patients?

Authors:  Peijie Lv; Zhigang Zhou; Jie Liu; Yaru Chai; Huiping Zhao; Hua Guo; Daniele Marin; Jianbo Gao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Use of dual-energy CT for renal mass assessment.

Authors:  Shanigarn Thiravit; Christina Brunnquell; Larry M Cai; Mena Flemon; Achille Mileto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  CT and MRI of small renal masses.

Authors:  Zhen J Wang; Antonio C Westphalen; Ronald J Zagoria
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  An overview of non-invasive imaging modalities for diagnosis of solid and cystic renal lesions.

Authors:  Ravinder Kaur; Mamta Juneja; A K Mandal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Inter-scan and inter-scanner variation of quantitative dual-energy CT: evaluation with three different scanner types.

Authors:  Simon Lennartz; Anushri Parakh; Jinjin Cao; David Zopfs; Nils Große Hokamp; Avinash Kambadakone
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Improved display of cervical intervertebral discs on water (iodine) images: incidental findings from single-source dual-energy CT angiography of head and neck arteries.

Authors:  Qingxia Wu; Dapeng Shi; Tianming Cheng; Hongming Liu; Niuniu Hu; Xiaowan Chang; Ying Guo; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  How accurate and precise are CT based measurements of iodine concentration? A comparison of the minimum detectable concentration difference among single source and dual source dual energy CT in a phantom study.

Authors:  André Euler; Justin Solomon; Maciej A Mazurowski; Ehsan Samei; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Effects of radiation dose levels and spectral iterative reconstruction levels on the accuracy of iodine quantification and virtual monochromatic CT numbers in dual-layer spectral detector CT: an iodine phantom study.

Authors:  Xiaomei Lu; Zaiming Lu; Jiandong Yin; Yuying Gao; Xingbiao Chen; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.