Ella Hancock-Johnson1, Chris Griffiths2, Marco Picchioni2,3. 1. St Andrew's Academic Department, St Andrew's Healthcare, Northampton, NN1 5DG, UK. EHancock-Johnson@standrew.co.uk. 2. St Andrew's Academic Department, St Andrew's Healthcare, Northampton, NN1 5DG, UK. 3. Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medicines are routinely prescribed to treat borderline personality disorder (BPD) despite a relative lack of high-quality evidence and in breach of some treatment guidelines. An earlier Cochrane review of pharmacotherapy in BPD underlined the lack of evidence, encouraged the replication of earlier studies, but also emphasised the pressing need for more randomised placebo-controlled trials, and for those studies to employ broadened inclusion criteria. METHOD: The authors searched bibliographic databases, reference lists of articles and trials registers. Records were screened to identify those that met the inclusion criteria. Full-text articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. On-going trials of pharmacotherapy in BPD were also identified. RESULTS: Fifteen new studies of pharmacotherapy for BPD were identified since the earlier review. Eight of those examined second generation antipsychotics, two investigated mood stabilisers, three investigated antidepressants and two studied the effectiveness of opioid antagonists. Results for the effectiveness of antipsychotics appeared to be mixed. There has been little recent evidence to support the use of mood stabilisers. There is a lack of new placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trials investigating antidepressants and limited new evidence to support the use of opioid antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: The review revealed that there remains a dearth of high-quality research evidence to help patients, carers and clinicians make sound and safe evidence-based decisions about medicines to treat BPD.
BACKGROUND: Medicines are routinely prescribed to treat borderline personality disorder (BPD) despite a relative lack of high-quality evidence and in breach of some treatment guidelines. An earlier Cochrane review of pharmacotherapy in BPD underlined the lack of evidence, encouraged the replication of earlier studies, but also emphasised the pressing need for more randomised placebo-controlled trials, and for those studies to employ broadened inclusion criteria. METHOD: The authors searched bibliographic databases, reference lists of articles and trials registers. Records were screened to identify those that met the inclusion criteria. Full-text articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. On-going trials of pharmacotherapy in BPD were also identified. RESULTS: Fifteen new studies of pharmacotherapy for BPD were identified since the earlier review. Eight of those examined second generation antipsychotics, two investigated mood stabilisers, three investigated antidepressants and two studied the effectiveness of opioid antagonists. Results for the effectiveness of antipsychotics appeared to be mixed. There has been little recent evidence to support the use of mood stabilisers. There is a lack of new placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trials investigating antidepressants and limited new evidence to support the use of opioid antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: The review revealed that there remains a dearth of high-quality research evidence to help patients, carers and clinicians make sound and safe evidence-based decisions about medicines to treat BPD.
Authors: Mary C Zanarini; S Charles Schulz; Holland C Detke; Yoko Tanaka; Fangyi Zhao; Daniel Lin; Walter Deberdt; Ludmila Kryzhanovskaya; Sara Corya Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Mary C Zanarini; S Charles Schulz; Holland Detke; Fangyi Zhao; Daniel Lin; Mary Pritchard; Walter Deberdt; Garrett Fitzmaurice; Sara Corya Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Mary C Zanarini; Frances R Frankenburg; John Hennen; D Bradford Reich; Kenneth R Silk Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 18.112