Literature DB >> 21535995

A dose comparison of olanzapine for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Mary C Zanarini1, S Charles Schulz, Holland C Detke, Yoko Tanaka, Fangyi Zhao, Daniel Lin, Walter Deberdt, Ludmila Kryzhanovskaya, Sara Corya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of olanzapine at low and moderate doses for the treatment of borderline personality disorder.
METHOD: In this 12-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 451 outpatients aged 18-65 years with DSM-IV borderline personality disorder received olanzapine 2.5 mg/d (n = 150), olanzapine 5-10 mg/d (n = 148), or placebo (n = 153). The trial was conducted from February 2004 through January 2006 at 59 community-based and academic study centers in 9 countries (United States, Italy, Poland, Romania, Turkey, Chile, Peru, Argentina, and Venezuela). The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline to last-observation-carried-forward endpoint on the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD) total score. Secondary measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Modified Overt Aggression Scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, and the Sheehan Disability Scale.
RESULTS: An overall mean baseline ZAN-BPD total score of 17.2 (SD = 4.9) indicated moderate symptom severity. Only treatment with olanzapine 5-10 mg/d was associated with significantly greater mean change from baseline to endpoint in ZAN-BPD total score relative to placebo (-8.5 vs -6.8, respectively; P = .010; effect size = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.06-0.52). Response rates (response indicated by ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in ZAN-BPD total score) were significantly higher for olanzapine 5-10 mg/d (73.6%) versus olanzapine 2.5 mg/d (60.1%; P = .018) and versus placebo (57.8%; P = .006). Time to response was also significantly shorter for patients taking olanzapine 5-10 mg/d than for placebo-treated patients (P = .028). Treatment-emergent adverse events reported significantly more frequently among olanzapine-treated patients included somnolence, fatigue, increased appetite, and weight increase (all P values < .05). Mean weight change from baseline to endpoint was significantly greater for olanzapine-treated than for placebo-treated patients (olanzapine 2.5 mg/d: 2.09 kg; olanzapine 5-10 mg/d: 3.17 kg; placebo: 0.02 kg; P < .001). The overall completion rate for the 12-week double-blind treatment period was 65.2% (ie, 64.7% for olanzapine 2.5 mg/d, 69.6% for olanzapine 5-10 mg/d, and 61.4% for placebo).
CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine 5-10 mg/d showed a clinically modest advantage over placebo in the treatment of overall borderline psychopathology. This advantage in effectiveness should be weighed against the risk of adverse events (particularly weight gain), which were consistent with the known safety profile of olanzapine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00088036. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21535995     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.08m04138yel

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  22 in total

1.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Web-Based Psychoeducation for Women With Borderline Personality Disorder.

Authors:  Mary C Zanarini; Lindsey C Conkey; Christina M Temes; Garrett M Fitzmaurice
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 2.  Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder--current evidence and recent trends.

Authors:  Jutta M Stoffers; Klaus Lieb
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  A Focused Systematic Review of Pharmacological Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder.

Authors:  Ella Hancock-Johnson; Chris Griffiths; Marco Picchioni
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  Management of borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Robert S Biskin; Joel Paris
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.

Authors:  Alan F Schatzberg; DeBattista Charles
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2018-01-15

Review 6.  Dosing and Monitoring: Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Glenn S Hirsch
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2018-02-05

7.  Efficacy and Tolerability of Asenapine Compared with Olanzapine in Borderline Personality Disorder: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Paola Bozzatello; Paola Rocca; Maria Uscinska; Silvio Bellino
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  Pharmacological interventions for borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Jutta Stoffers; Birgit A Völlm; Gerta Rücker; Antje Timmer; Nick Huband; Klaus Lieb
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

9.  Metabolic adverse effects of off-label use of second-generation antipsychotics in the adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicolette Stogios; Emily Smith; Sylvie Bowden; Veronica Tran; Roshanak Asgariroozbehani; William Brett McIntyre; Gary Remington; Dan Siskind; Sri Mahavir Agarwal; Margaret K Hahn
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 10.  Dissociative seizures: a challenge for neurologists and psychotherapists.

Authors:  Kurt Fritzsche; Kathrin Baumann; Katrin Götz-Trabert; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.