Literature DB >> 28353015

Psychosocial Factors Impacting Workplace Injury Rehabilitation: Evaluation of a Concise Screening Tool.

Sareen McLinton1, Sarven Savia McLinton2, Martin van der Linden3.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether the delayed recovery often observed in simple musculoskeletal injuries occurring at work is related to poor workplace and home social support. Method A four question psychosocial screening tool called the "How are you coping gauge?" (HCG) was developed. This tool was implemented as part of the initial assessment for all new musculoskeletal workplace injuries. Participants were excluded if they did not meet the strict criteria used to classify a musculoskeletal injury as simple. The HCG score was then compared to the participant's number of days until return to full capacity (DTFC). It was hypothesised that those workers indicating a poorer level of workplace and home support would take longer time to return to full capacity. Results A sample of 254 participants (316 excluded) were included in analysis. Significant correlation (p < 0.001) was observed between HCG scores for self-reported work and home support and DTFC thereby confirming the hypothesis. Path analysis found workplace support to be a significant moderate-to-strong predictor of DTFC (-0.46). Conclusion A correlation was observed between delayed workplace injury recovery and poor perceived workplace social support. The HCG may be an effective tool for identifying these factors in musculoskeletal workplace injuries of a minor pathophysiological nature. There may be merit in tailoring injury rehabilitation towards addressing psychosocial factors early in the injury recovery process to assist with a more expedient return to full work capacity following simple acute musculoskeletal injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Musculoskeletal pain; Occupational injuries; Rehabilitation; Social support; Surveys and questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28353015     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9701-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  42 in total

1.  Victims twice over: perceptions and experiences of injured workers.

Authors:  Barbara A Beardwood; Bonnie Kirsh; Nancy J Clark
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-01

Review 2.  Wound healing and TIME; new concepts and scientific applications.

Authors:  Gregory Schultz; David Mozingo; Marco Romanelli; Karl Claxton
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  The relationship between safety climate and injury rates across industries: the need to adjust for injury hazards.

Authors:  Gordon S Smith; Yueng-Hsiang Huang; Michael Ho; Peter Y Chen
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2006-01-23

4.  Workers' beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Henrica C W de Vet; Dirk L Knol; Paulien M Bongers; Bart W Koes; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

5.  The association of socioeconomic status and psychosocial and physical workplace factors with musculoskeletal injury in hospital workers.

Authors:  Marion Gillen; Irene H Yen; Laura Trupin; Louise Swig; Reiner Rugulies; Kathleen Mullen; Aurelio Font; David Burian; Greg Ryan; Ira Janowitz; Patricia A Quinlan; John Frank; Paul Blanc
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  A national US study of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and work and functional outcomes after hospitalization for traumatic injury.

Authors:  Douglas Zatzick; Gregory J Jurkovich; Frederick P Rivara; Jin Wang; Ming-Yu Fan; Jutta Joesch; Ellen Mackenzie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  What leads to the expectation to return to work? Insights from a Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) model of future work outcomes.

Authors:  Debra A Dunstan; Tanya Covic; Graham A Tyson
Journal:  Work       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 9.  Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Jl Sullivan; Michael Feuerstein; Robert Gatchel; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 10.  Muscle injuries: biology and treatment.

Authors:  Tero A H Järvinen; Teppo L N Järvinen; Minna Kääriäinen; Hannu Kalimo; Markku Järvinen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.