| Literature DB >> 28352101 |
Lorenzo Mari1, Marino Gatto2, Manuela Ciddio2, Elhadji D Dia3, Susanne H Sokolow4,5, Giulio A De Leo4, Renato Casagrandi6.
Abstract
Schistosomiasis is a parasitic infection that is widespread in sub-Saharan Africa, where it represents a major health problem. We study the drivers of its geographical distribution in Senegal via a spatially explicit network model accounting for epidemiological dynamics driven by local socioeconomic and environmental conditions, and human mobility. The model is parameterized by tapping several available geodatabases and a large dataset of mobile phone traces. It reliably reproduces the observed spatial patterns of regional schistosomiasis prevalence throughout the country, provided that spatial heterogeneity and human mobility are suitably accounted for. Specifically, a fine-grained description of the socioeconomic and environmental heterogeneities involved in local disease transmission is crucial to capturing the spatial variability of disease prevalence, while the inclusion of human mobility significantly improves the explanatory power of the model. Concerning human movement, we find that moderate mobility may reduce disease prevalence, whereas either high or low mobility may result in increased prevalence of infection. The effects of control strategies based on exposure and contamination reduction via improved access to safe water or educational campaigns are also analyzed. To our knowledge, this represents the first application of an integrative schistosomiasis transmission model at a whole-country scale.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28352101 PMCID: PMC5428445 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00493-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schistosomiasis transmission cycle (a) and data for model application (b–e). (a) Paired adult worms within human hosts produce eggs (left to right: S. mansoni, S. japonicum, S. haematobium) that are shed through feces or urine and hatch into miracidia. Miracidia infect species-specific intermediate snail hosts (left to right: genus Biomphalaria, Bulinus, Oncomelania), which then shed free-swimming cercariae that can penetrate human skin and eventually develop into reproductive schistosomes. (b) High-resolution population density map of Senegal [inhabitants km−2]. Black lines indicate administrative boundaries (thick/thin lines are for regions/arrondissements). Regions are numbered as follows: 1–Dakar, 2–Thiès, 3–Diourbel, 4–Fatick, 5–Louga, 6–Kaolack, 7–Kaffrine, 8–Saint-Louis, 9–Kolda, 10–Sédhiou, 11–Ziguinchor, 12–Kédougou, 13–Tambacounda, 14–Matam. (c) People living in rural settings [%] (colors) and rivers of Senegal (thick/thin white lines are for perennial/ephemeral rivers). (d) Human mobility fluxes in year 2013 [number of people] estimated from anonymous mobile phone traces; the flux between any two arrondissements (say i and j, ) is obtained as K Q (see Table 1). Only fluxes ≥100 people are displayed as links between arrondissement-level population centroids. (e) Prevalence of urogenital schistosomiasis [% of infected people] according to the national surveys operated by the Senegalese Ministry of Health. Data are shown at the scale of health districts and cover the timespan 1996–2013. See SI for details on data sources. The drawings in panel a are from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Parasites: Schistosomiasis, http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/schistosomiasis/biology.html; last date of access: 03/02/2017). The maps in panels b–e have been created with QGIS 2.4 (QGIS Development Team, QGIS: A free and open source geographic information system, http://www.qgis.org/; last date of access: 03/02/2017) and MATLAB R2015b (MathWorks, MATLAB, http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/; last date of access: 03/02/2017).
Model variables and parameters.
| Symbol | Variable |
|---|---|
|
| abundance of people hosting |
|
| abundance of susceptible snails in community |
|
| abundance of infected snails in freshwater used by community |
|
| abundance of cercariae in freshwater used by community |
|
| abundance of miracidia in freshwater used by community |
|
| baseline human mortality rate |
|
| human population size in community |
|
| force of infection for people in community |
|
| probability of schistosome establishment in human hosts |
|
| human mobility matrix (between communities |
|
| rate of human exposure to cercariae in community |
|
| parasite resolution rate for human hosts with |
|
| schistosome mortality rate |
|
| schistosomiasis-related mortality rate for human hosts with |
|
| additional human mortality rate induced by each parasite |
|
| maximum number of parasites in human hosts |
|
| parasite threshold for clinical infection in humans |
|
| baseline snail mortality rate |
|
| snail population size in community |
|
| rate of snail exposure to miracidia |
|
| infection-related mortality rate in snails |
|
| cercarial shedding rate by infected snails |
|
| mortality rate of cercariae |
|
| rate of freshwater contamination by infected people in community |
|
| miracidial shedding rate by infected humans |
|
| probability of freshwater contamination by infected people in community |
|
| abundance of schistosomes carried by residents of community |
|
| mortality rate of miracidia |
|
| synthetic human exposure rate |
|
| synthetic human contamination rate |
|
| rurality score of community |
|
| freshwater availability score of community |
|
| baseline value of the synthetic human exposure rate (calibrated) |
|
| baseline value of the synthetic human contamination rate (calibrated) |
|
| shape parameter for the human exposure rate (calibrated) |
|
| shape parameter for the human contamination rate (calibrated) |
The top and middle parts of the table summarize the state variables and the parameters of the schistosomiasis transmission model described in the Methods section, while the bottom part describes the synthetic human exposure and contamination rates obtained after introducing equilibrium assumptions for larval abundances and rescaling the remaining state variables (see SI for details).
Figure 2Reference model simulation and comparison with epidemiological evidence. (a) Quantitative agreement between simulated disease prevalence at the regional scale and the available data (labels as in Fig. 1b) for the best-fit model accounting for fine-grained spatial heterogeneity in transmission risk and human mobility estimated from CDRs (M4, reference model). (b) Projected schistosomiasis prevalence [% of people infected] at the scale of third-level administrative units as obtained from the reference model. Calibrated parameter values: β 0 = 5.5 · 10−3 [days−1], χ 0 = 2.2 · 10−6 [days−1 parasites−1], , . See Table 1 for parameter definitions and Methods for details on the model. The map in panel (b) has been created with QGIS 2.4 (QGIS Development Team, QGIS: A free and open source geographic information system, http://www.qgis.org/; last date of access: 03/02/2017) and MATLAB R2015b (MathWorks, MATLAB, http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/; last date of access: 03/02/2017).
Figure 3Effects of human mobility on schistosomiasis prevalence. (a) Differences [%] in regional disease prevalence (labels as in Fig. 1b) as predicted by the reference model (M4, mobility matrix estimated from CDRs) or by a model with the same parameter values but no mobility (mobility matrix set to be the identity matrix); positive values indicate higher prevalence in the model without mobility (absolute differences sorted in decreasing order). Inset: arrondissement-scale differences in infection prevalence: positive values indicate again higher prevalence in the model without mobility. (b) Projected country-scale disease prevalence (black, left axis) and APB (gray, right axis) as a function of the fraction of mobile people (those who leave their home arrondissement at least once a year). The dots indicate infection prevalence and APB corresponding to the mobility level inferred from CDR analysis (26%). Different levels of human mobility have been obtained by artificially manipulating the mobility matrix estimated from data (SI). Parameters as in Fig. 2. The map in the inset of panel (a) has been created with QGIS 2.4 (QGIS Development Team, QGIS: A free and open source geographic information system, http://www.qgis.org/; last date of access: 03/02/2017) and MATLAB R2015b (MathWorks, MATLAB, http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/; last date of access: 03/02/2017).
Figure 4Evaluation of large-scale control strategies. (a) Effect of WASH interventions on country-wide average schistosomiasis prevalence. (b) As in panel a, but for maximum regional prevalence. (c,d) As in panels a,b, but for IEC campaigns. Targeted actions prioritize communities where transmission risk (as quantified by the quantity ρ ω , see Table 1 and Methods; blue lines) or schistosomiasis prevalence (green) is highest. Results are shown for two different values of the expected efficiency (η) of the control actions. See SI for details on WASH/IEC interventions. Parameters as in Fig. 2.