Literature DB >> 28350520

Genomic Classifier Augments the Role of Pathological Features in Identifying Optimal Candidates for Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prognostic Model.

Deepansh Dalela1, María Santiago-Jiménez1, Kasra Yousefi1, R Jeffrey Karnes1, Ashley E Ross1, Robert B Den1, Stephen J Freedland1, Edward M Schaeffer1, Adam P Dicker1, Mani Menon1, Alberto Briganti1, Elai Davicioni1, Firas Abdollah1.   

Abstract

Purpose Despite documented oncologic benefit, use of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in patients with prostate cancer is still limited in the United States. We aimed to develop and internally validate a risk-stratification tool incorporating the Decipher score, along with routinely available clinicopathologic features, to identify patients who would benefit the most from aRT. Patient and Methods Our cohort included 512 patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy at one of four US academic centers between 1990 and 2010. All patients had ≥ pT3a disease, positive surgical margins, and/or pathologic lymph node invasion. Multivariable Cox regression analysis tested the relationship between available predictors (including Decipher score) and clinical recurrence (CR), which were then used to develop a novel risk-stratification tool. Our study adhered to the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis guidelines for development of prognostic models. Results Overall, 21.9% of patients received aRT. Median follow-up in censored patients was 8.3 years. The 10-year CR rate was 4.9% vs. 17.4% in patients treated with aRT versus initial observation ( P < .001). Pathologic T3b/T4 stage, Gleason score 8-10, lymph node invasion, and Decipher score > 0.6 were independent predictors of CR (all P < .01). The cumulative number of risk factors was 0, 1, 2, and 3 to 4 in 46.5%, 28.9%, 17.2%, and 7.4% of patients, respectively. aRT was associated with decreased CR rate in patients with two or more risk factors (10-year CR rate 10.1% in aRT v 42.1% in initial observation; P = .012), but not in those with fewer than two risk factors ( P = .18). Conclusion Using the new model to indicate aRT might reduce overtreatment, decrease unnecessary adverse effects, and reduce risk of CR in the subset of patients (approximately 25% of all patients with aggressive pathologic disease in our cohort) who benefit from this therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28350520      PMCID: PMC6530898          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of 1152 African-American and European-American men with prostate cancer identifies distinct genomic and immunological differences.

Authors:  Walter Rayford; Alp Tuna Beksac; Jordan Alger; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Mohsen Ahmed; Irtaza Khan; Ugo G Falagario; Yang Liu; Elai Davicioni; Daniel E Spratt; Edward M Schaeffer; Felix Y Feng; Brandon Mahal; Paul L Nguyen; Robert B Den; Mark D Greenberger; Randy Bradley; Justin M Watson; Matthew Beamer; Lambros Stamatakis; Darrell J Carmen; Shivanshu Awasthi; Jonathan Hwang; Rachel Weil; Harri Merisaari; Nihal Mohamed; Leslie A Deane; Dimple Chakravarty; Kamlesh K Yadav; Kosj Yamoah; Sujit S Nair; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

Review 2.  Genomic testing for localized prostate cancer: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Ashley E Ross
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  [Postoperative radiation therapy for prostate cancer : Still no genomic risk profiling for clinical routine].

Authors:  Tobias Finazzi; Frank Zimmermann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Adjuvant radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients with positive margins or extracapsular extension.

Authors:  Chandler Bronkema; Nikola Rakic; Firas Abdollah
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 5.  Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy Following Radical Prostatectomy for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Robert T Dess; Todd M Morgan; Paul L Nguyen; Rohit Mehra; Howard M Sandler; Felix Y Feng; Daniel E Spratt
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Comparison Between Adjuvant and Early-Salvage Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer With Adverse Pathological Features.

Authors:  William L Hwang; Rahul D Tendulkar; Andrzej Niemierko; Shree Agrawal; Kevin L Stephans; Daniel E Spratt; Jason W Hearn; Bridget F Koontz; W Robert Lee; Jeff M Michalski; Thomas M Pisansky; Stanley L Liauw; Matthew C Abramowitz; Alan Pollack; Drew Moghanaki; Mitchell S Anscher; Robert B Den; Anthony L Zietman; Andrew J Stephenson; Jason A Efstathiou
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA Guideline Amendment 2018-2019.

Authors:  Thomas M Pisansky; Ian M Thompson; Richard K Valicenti; Anthony V D'Amico; Shalini Selvarajah
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Adjuvant hormone therapy after radical prostatectomy in high-risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: First multicenter, observational study in China.

Authors:  Dingwei Ye; Wei Zhang; Lulin Ma; Chuanjun Du; Liping Xie; Yiran Huang; Qiang Wei; Zhangqun Ye; Yanqun Na
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth staging system among prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-11-08

10.  Tissue-based biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy N Clinton; Aditya Bagrodia; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis; Ganesh V Raj; Solomon L Woldu
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2017-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.