| Literature DB >> 28348449 |
Nasser Attia Elhawary1, Anmar Nassir2, Hesham Saada3, Anas Dannoun4, Omar Qoqandi4, Ammar Alsharif5, Mohammed Taher Tayeb4.
Abstract
We evaluated the associations between seven single nucleotide polymorphisms and susceptibility to urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) in a Saudi population. Genomic DNA was taken from buccal cells of 52 patients with UBC and 104 controls for genotyping of GSTT1, GSTM1, rs4646903, rs1048943, TP53 rs1042522, rs1801133, and rs1801394 using PCR and TaqMan® assays. The rs1801133 and rs1801394 variants showed strong associations with UBC (OR = 2.3, P = 0.0002; OR = 2.6, P = 0.0001, resp.). Homozygosity of Pro72 conferred a significant double risk in cases compared with controls (30.8% versus 15.4%), but the homozygote Arg/Arg had no effect on risk. Genotypic combinations of GSTM1/GSTT1, rs4646903/rs1048943, and rs1801133/rs1801394 exhibited significant linkage with the disease (χ2 = 10.3, P = 0.006; χ2 = 13.9, P = 0.003; and χ2 = 20.4, P = 0.0004, resp.). The GSTM1 and rs1042522Arg and rs1801394G variant alleles were more frequent in current smokers with UBC (52.4%, 52.5%, and 64.3%, resp.) than were the corresponding wild-types. Despite some variants having only a slight effect on UBC risk, the interaction effect of combined genetic biomarkers-or even the presence of one copy of a variant allele-is potentially much greater. Perhaps more studies regarding next-generation genetic sequencing and its utility can add to the risk of UBC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28348449 PMCID: PMC5350417 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1474560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics in UBC cases.
| Parameter | UBC cases |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age at examination (range, years) | 46–90 | |
| Mean age ± SD (years) | 61.8 ± 10.63 | 38.5 (58.8–64.8)a |
| Gender, males (%)b | 48 (92.3) | 28.9 (81.5–97.9)c |
| Cigarette smoking (current)b | 42 (80.8) | 25.1 (67.5–90.4)c |
| Alcohol consumption (yes) | — | — |
|
| ||
| Low-gradeb | 17 (32.7) | 9.2 (20.3–47.1)c |
| High-gradeb | 35 (67.3) | 20.6 (52.9–79.7)c |
|
| ||
| pTab | 31 (59.6) | 18.1 (45.1–73.0)c |
| pT1b | 9 (17.3) | 4.1 (8.2–30.3)c |
| pT2b | 12 (23.1) | 6.0 (12.6–36.9)c |
|
| 0 (0.0) | |
|
| ||
| BCGb (yes)a,d | 40 (76.9) | 23.8 (63.1–87.5)c |
| Conservative therapyb,e | 42 (80.8) | 25.1 (67.5–90.4)c |
| Radical cystectomyb | 5 (9.6) | 1.5 (3.2–21.0) ( |
| Chemoradiotherapyb | 3 (5.8) | 0.3 (1.2–16.0) ( |
| Chemotherapyb | 2 (3.8) | 0.4 (0.5–13.1) ( |
a Student's t-test. Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD).
bNumber of patients, with percentages in parentheses.
cVery highly significant difference (P < 0.0001).
dBCG, bacillus Calmette-Guérin, a weakened bacterium intravesically introduced via a catheter.
e“Conservative therapy,” TURBT plus BCG.
fNo significant difference (P > 0.05).
Genotype distributions and allele frequencies of examined SNPs in UBC cases.
| SNP ID | Cases | Controls |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
| ||||
| “+/+” | 28 (53.8) | 64 (61.5) | 0.8 (0.4)a | 0.8 (0.4)b |
| “−/−” | 24 (46.2) | 40 (38.5) | 0.8 (0.4)a | |
| “+” | 56 (0.54) | 128 (0.62) | 1.4 (0.9–2.2); 1.3 (0.19)c | |
| “−” | 48 (0.46) | 80 (0.38) | ||
|
| ||||
| “+/+” | 46 (88.5) | 96 (92.3) | 0.6 (0.4)a | 0.6 (0.4)b |
| “−/−” | 6 (11.5) | 8 (7.7) | 0.6 (0.4)a | |
| “+” | 92 (0.88) | 192 (0.92) | 1.6 (0.7–3.4); 1.1 (0.27)c | |
| “−” | 12 (0.12) | 16 (0.08) | ||
|
| ||||
| TT | 34 (65.4) | 60 (57.7) | 0.8 (0.4)a | 1.7 (0.4)b |
| TC | 16 (30.8) | 42 (40.4) | 1.4 (0.2)a | |
| CC | 2 (3.8) | 2 (1.9) | 0.5 (0.5)a | |
| T | 84 (0.81) | 162 (0.78) | 0.8 (0.5–1.5); 0.6 (0.56)c | |
| C | 20 (0.19) | 46 (0.22) | ||
|
| ||||
| AA | 46 (88.5) | 92 (88.5) | 0.0 (1.0)a | 4.5 (0.1)b |
| AG | 4 (30.8) | 12 (11.5) | 8.7 (0.003)a | |
| GG | 2 (26.9) | 0 (0.0) | 30.5 (<0.0001)a | |
| A | 96 (0.92) | 196 (0.94) | 1.4 (0.5–3.4); 0.7 (0.5)c | |
| G | 8 (0.08) | 12 (0.06) | ||
|
| ||||
| Pro/Pro | 16 (30.8) | 16 (15.4) | 5.0 (0.03)a | 5.6 (0.06)b |
| Pro/Arg | 22 (42.3) | 60 (57.7) | 3.3 (0.07)a | |
| Arg/Arg | 14 (26.9) | 28 (26.9) | 0.0 (1.0)a | |
| Pro | 54 (0.52) | 92 (0.44) | 0.7 (0.5–1.2); 1.3 (0.2)c | |
| Arg | 50 (0.48) | 116 (0.56) | ||
|
| ||||
| CC | 33 (63.5) | 88 (84.6) | 8.8 (0.003)a | 14.4 (0.0007)b |
| CT | 14 (26.9) | 16 (15.4) | 2.9 (0.09)a | |
| TT | 5 (9.6) | 0 (0.0) | 10.2 (0.001)a | |
| C | 80 (0.77) | 192 (0.88) | 3.6 (1.8–7.1); 3.7 (0.0002)c | |
| T | 24 (0.23) | 16 (0.12) | ||
|
| ||||
| AA | 0 (0.0) | 40 (38.5) | 26.8 (<0.0001)a | 35.6 (0.00001)b |
| AG | 32 (61.5) | 54 (51.9) | 1.3 (0.3)a | |
| GG | 20 (38.5) | 10 (9.6) | 18.5 (<0.0001)a | |
| A | 32 (0.31) | 134 (0.64) | 4.1 (2.5–6.7); 5.5 (<0.0001)c | |
| G | 72 (0.69) | 74 (0.36) | ||
“+”: present allele; “−”: null allele; “−,−”: homozygous null genotype; “+,+”: homozygous present genotype; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
aStatistical difference between two similar genotypes in cases and controls.
bStatistical difference between genotypes of a specific SNP in cases compared with controls.
cComparison of allele frequencies of a specific SNP.
Genotypic combinations of examined SNPs showing risk of UBC in cases and controls.
| Genotypic combination | Cases | Controls |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| +,+/+,+ | 36 (34.6) | 112 (53.8) | 10.2 (0.001) | |
| −,−/+,+ | 56 (53.8) | 80 (38.5) | 6.6 (0.01) | 10.3 (0.006) |
| +,+/−,− | 12 (11.5) | 16 (7.7) | 1.2 (0.3) | |
| −,−/−,− | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | NA | NA |
|
| ||||
| TT/AA | 72 (69.2) | 120 (57.7) | 3.9 (0.04) | |
| TC/AG | 8 (7.7) | 24 (11.5) | 1.1 (0.3) | |
| TC/AA | 20 (19.2) | 64 (30.8) | 4.7 (0.03) | 13.9 (0.003) |
| CC/GG | 4 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 4.0 (0.047) | |
|
| ||||
| CC/AA | 0 (0.0) | 8 (3.8) | 4.2 (0.04) | |
| CC/AG | 56 (53.8) | 120 (57.7) | 0.4 (0.5) | |
| CC/GG | 20 (19.2) | 32 (15.4) | 0.7 (0.4) | |
| CT/AA | 0 (0.0) | 8 (3.8) | 4.2 (0.04) | 20.4 (0.0004) |
| CT/AG | 20 (19.2) | 40 (19.2) | 0.0 (1.0) | |
| CT/GG | 8 (7.7) | 0 (0.0) | 8.3 (0.0001) | |
“+”: present allele; “−”: null allele; “+,+”: homozygous present genotype; “−,−”: homozygote null genotype; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
aStatistically significant difference between a specific combined genotype in cases and controls.
bStatistically significant difference between combined genotypes in cases compared with controls.
Effect of SNP allele percentages on phenotypes of 42 smokers with UBC.
| SNP ID | Wild-type allele | Variant allele |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| GSTM1 (+,−) | 40 (47.6) | 44 (52.4) | 0.4 (0.5) |
| GSTT1 (+,−) | 72 (85.7) | 12 (14.3) | 85.1 (<0.0001) |
| rs4646903 T>C | 70 (83.3) | 14 (16.7) | 74.1 (<0.0001) |
| rs1048943 A>G | 78 (92.9) | 6 (7.1) | 122.9 (<0.0001) |
| rs1042522 Pro>Arg | 40 (47.5) | 44 (52.5) | 0.4 (0.5) |
| rs1801133 C>T | 74 (88.1) | 10 (11.9) | 97.0 (<0.0001) |
| rs1801394 A>G | 30 (35.7) | 54 (64.3) | 13.7 (0.0002) |
SIFT and PolyPhen2 functional predictions of SNP markers.
| SNP ID | Allele | Amino acid position | SIFT | PolyPhen2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Prediction | Confidence | Score | Prediction | |||
| rs1048943 | T>C | p.I462V | 0.16 | Tolerated | High | 0.18 | Benign |
| rs4646903 | A>G | NA | — | — | — | — | — |
| rs1042522 | G>C | p.P72A | 0.16 | Tolerated | High | 0.265 | Possibly damaging |
| rs1801133 | C>T | p.A222V | 0.03 | Damaging | High | 0.235 | Possibly damaging |
| rs1801394 | A>G | p.I22M | 0.01 | Damaging | High | 0.962 | Possibly damaging |
SIFT, Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (http://sift.jcvi.org/); PolyPhen2, Polymorphism phenotyping (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/).
NA: not applicable as it is in the noncoding 3′ flanking untranslated region. Low confidence means that the protein alignment does not have enough sequence diversity. Because the position artificially appears to be conserved, an amino acid may incorrectly be predicted to be damaging.