Literature DB >> 23887298

Advanced urothelial carcinoma: next-generation sequencing reveals diverse genomic alterations and targets of therapy.

Jeffrey S Ross1, Kai Wang2, Rami N Al-Rohil3, Tipu Nazeer3, Christine E Sheehan3, Geoff A Otto2, Jie He2, Gary Palmer2, Roman Yelensky2, Doron Lipson2, Siraj Ali2, Sohail Balasubramanian2, John A Curran2, Lazlo Garcia2, Kristen Mahoney2, Sean R Downing2, Matthew Hawryluk2, Vincent A Miller2, Philip J Stephens2.   

Abstract

Although urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the urinary bladder generally portends a favorable prognosis, metastatic tumors often follow an aggressive clinical course. DNA was extracted from 40 μm of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections from 35 stage IV UCs that had relapsed and progressed after primary surgery and conventional chemotherapy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation-based libraries for 3320 exons of 182 cancer-related genes plus 37 introns from 14 genes frequently rearranged in cancer to at an average sequencing depth of 1164 × and evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations (GAs). Actionable GAs were defined as those impacting the selection of targeted anticancer therapies on the market or in registered clinical trials. A total of 139 GAs were identified, with an average of 4.0 GAs per tumor (range 0-10), of which 78 (56%) were considered actionable, with an average of 2.2 per tumor (range 0-7). Twenty-nine (83%) cases harbored at least one actionable GA including: PIK3CA (9 cases; 26%); CDKN2A/B (8 cases; 23%); CCND1 (5 cases; 14%); FGFR1 (5 cases; 14%); CCND3 (4 cases; 11%); FGFR3 (4 cases; 11%); MCL1 (4 cases; 11%); MDM2 (4 cases; 11%); EGFR (2 cases, 6%); ERBB2 (HER2/neu) (2 cases, 6%); NF1 (2 cases, 6%) and TSC1 (2 cases, 6%). Notable additional alterations included TP53 (19 cases, 54%) and RB1 (6 cases; 17%). Genes involved in chromatin modification were altered by nonsense mutation, splice site mutation or frameshift indel in a mutually exclusive manner in nearly half of all cases including KDM6A (10 cases; 29%) and ARID1A (7 cases; 20%). Comprehensive NGS of 35 UCs of the bladder revealed a diverse spectrum of actionable GAs in 83% of cases, which has the potential to inform treatment decisions for patients with relapsed and metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23887298     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  67 in total

Review 1.  Computational approaches to study the effects of small genomic variations.

Authors:  Kamil Khafizov; Maxim V Ivanov; Olga V Glazova; Sergei P Kovalenko
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 2.  The NF1 somatic mutational landscape in sporadic human cancers.

Authors:  Charlotte Philpott; Hannah Tovell; Ian M Frayling; David N Cooper; Meena Upadhyaya
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.639

3.  An implantable microdevice to perform high-throughput in vivo drug sensitivity testing in tumors.

Authors:  Oliver Jonas; Heather M Landry; Jason E Fuller; John T Santini; Jose Baselga; Robert I Tepper; Michael J Cima; Robert Langer
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Molecular pathways: deregulation of histone h3 lysine 27 methylation in cancer-different paths, same destination.

Authors:  Teresa Ezponda; Jonathan D Licht
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  MCL1 and DEDD Promote Urothelial Carcinoma Progression.

Authors:  Jonathan E Rosenberg; William C Hahn; Andrew L Hong; Jennifer L Guerriero; Mihir B Doshi; Bryan D Kynnap; Won Jun Kim; Anna C Schinzel; Rebecca Modiste; Amy J Schlauch; Rosalyn M Adam; David J Kwiatkowski; Rameen Beroukhim; Anthony Letai
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 6.  Novel molecular targets for urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Bishoy M Faltas; Beerinder S Karir; Scott T Tagawa; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 6.902

7.  In vivo disruption of an Rb-E2F-Ezh2 signaling loop causes bladder cancer.

Authors:  Mirentxu Santos; Mónica Martínez-Fernández; Marta Dueñas; Ramón García-Escudero; Begoña Alfaya; Felipe Villacampa; Cristina Saiz-Ladera; Clotilde Costa; Marta Oteo; José Duarte; Victor Martínez; Mª José Gómez-Rodriguez; Mª Luisa Martín; Manoli Fernández; Patrick Viatour; Miguel A Morcillo; Julien Sage; Daniel Castellano; Jose L Rodriguez-Peralto; Federico de la Rosa; Jesús M Paramio
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Oncogenic alterations in ERBB2/HER2 represent potential therapeutic targets across tumors from diverse anatomic sites of origin.

Authors:  Juliann Chmielecki; Jeffrey S Ross; Kai Wang; Garrett M Frampton; Gary A Palmer; Siraj M Ali; Norma Palma; Deborah Morosini; Vincent A Miller; Roman Yelensky; Doron Lipson; Philip J Stephens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-12-05

9.  A randomized phase 2 trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin with or without cetuximab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Stephanie Daignault; Neeraj Agarwal; Petros D Grivas; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Igor Puzanov; Gary R MacVicar; Ellis Glenn Levine; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Mario A Eisenberger; David I Quinn; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Evan Y Yu; Scott Dawsey; Kathleen C Day; Mark L Day; Mahmoud Al-Hawary; David C Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  The role of genomics in the management of advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Guancial; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.