| Literature DB >> 28346341 |
Li Wang1, Min Wu2, Hua-Min Liu3, Yu-Xiang Ma4, Xue-De Wang5, Guang-Yong Qin6.
Abstract
Chinese quince seed (CQS) is an underutilized oil source and a potential source of unsaturated fatty acids and α-tocopherol-rich oil. Subcritical fluid (SCF) extraction is executed at lower pressures and temperatures than the pressures and temperatures used in supercritical fluid extraction. However, no studies on the SCF extraction of CQS oil are reported. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the use of SCF for the extraction of CQS oil and to compare the use of SCF with the classical Soxhlet (CS) and supercritical CO₂ (SC-CO₂) extraction methods. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to investigate the extraction conditions: temperature (45-65 °C), time (30-50 min), and solvent/solid ratio (5-15 mL/g). The optimization results showed that the highest yield (27.78%) was obtained at 56.18 °C, 40.20 min, and 12.57 mL/g. The oil extracted by SCF had a higher unsaturated fatty acid content (86.37%-86.75%), higher α-tocopherol content (576.0-847.6 mg/kg), lower acid value (3.97 mg/g), and lower peroxide value (0.02 meq O₂/kg) than extractions using CS and SC-CO2 methods. The SCF-defatted meal of oilseed exhibited the highest nitrogen solubility index (49.64%) and protein dispersibility index (50.80%), demonstrating that SCF extraction was a promising and efficient technique as an alternative to CS and SC-CO2 methods, as very mild operating conditions and an eco-friendly solvent can be used in the process with maximum preservation of the quality of the meal.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese quince seed oil; characterization; response surface methodology; subcritical fluid extraction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28346341 PMCID: PMC6154316 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22040528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effects of (a) extraction temperature, (b) extraction time, and (c) solvent/solid (S/S) ratio on oil yield from Chinese quince seed. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters of a–c in columns show statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Box–Behnken design of three variables with the Chinese quince seed oil yields 1.
| Run NO. 2 | Parameters and Levels | Oil Yield (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | 45 | 30 | 10 | 16.11 | 16.17 |
| 2 | 65 | 30 | 10 | 21.00 | 21.09 |
| 3 | 45 | 50 | 10 | 19.25 | 19.16 |
| 4 | 65 | 50 | 10 | 18.25 | 18.19 |
| 5 | 45 | 40 | 5 | 12.98 | 12.90 |
| 6 | 65 | 40 | 5 | 13.42 | 13.31 |
| 7 | 45 | 40 | 15 | 19.07 | 19.18 |
| 8 | 65 | 40 | 15 | 22.65 | 22.73 |
| 9 | 55 | 30 | 5 | 16.99 | 17.01 |
| 10 | 55 | 50 | 5 | 15.95 | 16.12 |
| 11 | 55 | 30 | 15 | 24.10 | 23.93 |
| 12 | 55 | 50 | 15 | 24.93 | 24.91 |
| 13 | 55 | 40 | 10 | 26.25 | 26.71 |
| 14 | 55 | 40 | 10 | 27.44 | 26.71 |
| 15 | 55 | 40 | 10 | 26.32 | 26.71 |
| 16 | 55 | 40 | 10 | 26.95 | 26.71 |
| 17 | 55 | 40 | 10 | 26.60 | 26.71 |
1 X = temperature (°C), X = time (min), X = solvent/solid ratio (mL/g); 2 Experiments were conducted in a standard order.
Analysis of variance for the Chinese quince seed oil yields as the desired response.
| Source a | Sum of squares | DF | Mean | Model fit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 392.23 | 9 | 43.59 | < 0.0001 b | |
| 125.68 | 1 | 125.68 | < 0.0001 b | Adj | |
| 3.07 | 1 | 3.07 | 0.0030 c | CV = 1.87% | |
| 66.60 | 1 | 66.60 | < 0.0001 b | N/A | |
| 8.67 | 1 | 8.67 | 0.0001 b | N/A | |
| 2.46 | 1 | 2.46 | 0.0053 c | N/A | |
| 0.87 | 1 | 0.87 | 0.0494 c | N/A | |
| 139.74 | 1 | 139.74 | < 0.0001 b | N/A | |
| 22.24 | 1 | 22.24 | < 0.0001 b | N/A | |
| 64.73 | 1 | 64.73 | < 0.0001 b | N/A | |
| Residual | 1.09 | 7 | 0.16 | N/A | N/A |
| Lack of fit | 0.12 | 3 | 0.040 | 0.9132 | N/A |
| Pure error | 0.97 | 4 | 0.24 | N/A | N/A |
| Total | 393.41 | 16 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
DF = degrees of freedom; N/A = not applicable. a X = temperature (°C), X = time (min), X = solvent/solid ratio (mL/g), R = coefficient of determination, CV: coefficient of variation; b Statistically significant at p < 0.001; c Statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Response surface plots of oil yield affected by extraction temperature, extraction time and solvent/solid ratio. (a,b): time and temperature; (c,d): solvent/solid ratio and temperature; (e,f): solvent/solid ratio and time.
Total and sn-2 main fatty acid composition of Chinese quince seed oils extracted by various methods 1.
| Fatty acid | sn-1,2,3 (%) | sn-2 Position (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS | SCF | SC-CO2 | CS | SCF | SC-CO2 | |
| C14:0 | 0.07 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.01 |
| C16:0 | 9.35 ± 0.27 | 8.96 ± 0.38 | 9.86 ± 0.30 | 0.96 ± 0.16 | 3.00 ± 0.72 | 1.62 ± 0.31 |
| C18:0 | 2.80 ± 0.06 | 2.79 ± 0.05 | 2.43 ± 0.01 | 0.52 ± 0.18 | 5.83 ± 1.64 | 1.27 ± 0.53 |
| C18:1 | 40.35 ± 0.17 | 40.94 ± 0.16 | 38.38 ± 0.09 | 36.62 ± 0.24 | 31.90 ± 0.86 | 32.32 ± 0.11 |
| C18:2 | 45.23 ± 0.07 | 45.05 ± 0.05 | 46.43 ± 0.10 | 61.37 ± 0.27 | 58.80 ± 1.53 | 63.57 ± 0.72 |
| C18:3 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 1.02 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.00 | 1.12 ± 0.00 |
| C20:0 | 1.17 ± 0.02 | 1.20 ± 0.08 | 1.05 ± 0.10 | ND | 0.14 ± 0.03 | ND |
| C20:1 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | ND | ND | ND |
| C22:0 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.00 | ND | ND | ND |
1 Values are means ± s.d. of three replicate analyses. CS = classical Soxhlet, SCF = subcritical fluid, SC-CO2 = supercritical CO2, ND = not detected.
Characteristics of Chinese quince seed oil extracted by various methods 1.
| Extraction method | CS | SCF | SC-CO2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colour (Lovibond units) | 99.40 ± 1.15 | 95.50 ± 0.17 | 82.00 ± 1.83 |
| Density (g/mL) | 0.919 ± 0.02 | 0.917 ± 0.02 | 0.920 ± 0.03 |
| Refractive index | 1.472 ± 0.002 | 1.474 ± 0.012 | 1.473 ± 0.001 |
| Acid value (mg KOH/g) | 6.87 ± 0.12 | 3.97 ± 0.04 | 4.75 ± 0.05 |
| Iodine value (g/100 g) | 107.61 ± 1.19 | 108.91 ± 1.20 | 110.27 ± 5.13 |
| Peroxide value (meq O2/kg) | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.00 |
| Unsaponifiable matter (%) | 0.91 ± 0.001 | 1.35 ± 0.006 | 1.61 ± 0.002 |
| Saponification value (mg KOH/g) | 190.72 ± 0.79 | 191.25 ± 0.88 | 193.76 ± 0.91 |
| Tocopherols (mg/kg) | 620.1 ± 0.21 | 851.3 ± 0.23 | 578.4± 0.28 |
| α-Tocopherol | 619.9± 0.31 | 847.6± 0.32 | 576.0± 0.47 |
| β-Tocopherol | 0.2± 0.28 | 1.2± 0.08 | 1.1± 0.72 |
| γ-Tocopherol | ND | 2.5± 0.05 | 1.3± 0.24 |
| δ-Tocopherol | ND | ND | ND |
| Induction time (h) | 6.77 ± 0.04 | 6.85 ± 0.07 | 0.33 ± 0.00 |
1 Values are means ± s.d. of three replicate analyses. ND = not detected.
Figure A1Thermogravimetric/derivative thermogravimetric (TG/DTG) curves of Chinese quince seed oils extracted using (a) classical Soxhlet, (b) subcritical fluid, (c) supercritical carbon dioxide.
Main amino acid composition (acid treated) and functional characteristics of oilseed meals defatted by various methods.
| Parameter | CS | SCF | SC-CO2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amino acid (%, dry weight basis) | |||
| Asparaginic acid | 11.74 | 11.37 | 11.35 |
| Threonine | 1.50 | 1.57 | 3.46 |
| Serine | 2.60 | 2.56 | 4.31 |
| Glutamic acid | 28.88 | 28.76 | 26.58 |
| Glycine | 6.79 | 6.79 | 6.88 |
| Alanine | 1.41 | 3.86 | 4.06 |
| Cystine | 4.04 | 3.74 | 3.82 |
| Valine | 3.20 | 2.60 | 2.42 |
| Methionine | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.45 |
| Isoleucine | 2.24 | 2.25 | 2.28 |
| Leucine | 8.97 | 7.05 | 7.07 |
| Tyrosine | 3.15 | 3.46 | 3.27 |
| Phenylalanine | 5.01 | 4.92 | 3.52 |
| Histidine | 3.20 | 2.93 | 2.72 |
| Lysine | 3.12 | 2.64 | 2.48 |
| Arginine | 7.22 | 8.63 | 8.56 |
| Proline | 6.43 | 6.44 | 6.77 |
| Nitrogen solubility index (NSI, %) 1 | 35.57 | 49.64 | 35.78 |
| Protein dispersibility index (PDI, %) 1 | 37.23 | 50.80 | 38.28 |
1 Values are means ± s.d. of three replicate analyses.