| Literature DB >> 28345812 |
Wahiba Dhahri1, Sylvie Dussault1, Paola Haddad1, Julie Turgeon1, Sophie Tremblay1, Kevin Rolland1, Michel Desjarlais1, Katia Y Cáceres-Gorriti1, Raphael Mathieu1, Alain Rivard1.
Abstract
This study sought to determine the potential role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the detrimental effects of cigarette smoke on angiogenesis and neovascularization. Using large-scale miRNA profiling and qRT-PCR analyses, we identified let-7f as a pro-angiogenic miRNA which expression is significantly reduced in HUVECs treated with cigarette smoke extracts (CSE), and in the ischemic muscles of mice that are exposed to cigarette smoke (MES). In a mouse model of hindlimb ischaemia, intramuscular injection of let-7f mimic restored ischaemia-induced neovascularization in MES. Doppler flow ratios and capillary density in ischemic muscles were significantly improved in MES treated with let-7f mimic. Clinically, this was associated with reduced ambulatory impairment and hindlimb ischaemic damage. Treatment with let-7f mimic could also rescue pro-angiogenic cell (PAC) number and function (attachment, proliferation, migration) in MES. ALK5 (TGF-βR1), an important modulator of angiogenesis, is a target of let-7f. Here we show that ALK5 is increased in HUVECs exposed to CSE and in the ischaemic muscles of MES. This is associated with a downstream activation of the anti-angiogenic factors SMAD2/3 and PAI-1. Importantly, treatment with let-7f mimic reduces the expression of ALK5, SMAD2/3 and PAI-1 both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, let-7f overexpression or ALK5 inhibition can rescue angiogenesis in HUVECs exposed to CSE. Cigarette smoke exposure is associated with reduced expression of let-7f and activation of the anti-angiogenic TGF-β/ALK5 pathway. Overexpression of let-7f using a miRNA mimic could constitute a novel therapeutic strategy to improve ischaemia-induced neovascularization in pathological conditions.Entities:
Keywords: ALK5; TGF-βR1; angiogenesis; let-7f; microRNA; neovascularization; smoking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28345812 PMCID: PMC5571564 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Effect of cigarette smoke exposure on miRNA expression. A. List of 21 miRs that were down‐regulated by more than 15% in HUVECs exposed to CSE, as assessed by Affymetrix GeneChip array analysis (n = 3/group). B–C. Relative expression of miR let‐7f in HUVECs exposed to CSE (n = 5/group) (B) and in the ischaemic muscles of MES, (C) as quantified by real‐time qPCR (n = 8/group). Data are mean ± S.E.M.*P < 0.05 versus CTL.
Figure 2Effect of cigarette smoke exposure and let‐7f treatment on angiogenesis in endothelial cells. A–D. Evaluation of angiogenesis in vitro using a Matrigel assay (A and C, n = 8/group) and a spheroid assay (B and D, n = 4/group) in HUVECs exposed or not to CSE and treated with let‐7f mimic or a mimic control (mimic C). E. Evaluation of cell migration in vitro using a modified Boyden chamber assay in HUVECs exposed or not to CSE and treated with let‐7f mimic or a mimic control (mimic C) (n = 3/group). Data are mean ± S.E.M. *P < 0.05 versus mimic C; #P < 0.05 versus CSE+mimic C.
Figure 3Effect of cigarette smoke exposure and let‐7f treatment on ischaemia‐induced neovascularization. A and C. Representative images (A) and quantification (C) of laser Doppler measurements after hindlimb ischaemia in control mice (CTL) and in MES treated with let‐7f or a scrambled miR control (mimic C). A colour scale illustrates blood flow variations from minimal (dark blue) to maximal (red) values. Arrows indicate region of interest in left ischaemic hindlimbs (n = 10–12/group). B and D. Representative images (B) and quantification (D) of CD31 immunostaining in ischaemic (isch) and non‐ischaemic (n‐isch) hindlimb muscles of the different groups of mice (n = 12–13/group). E–F. Percentage of mice walking normally (E) and presenting no ischaemic damage (F) in the different groups at day 21 after ischaemia (n = 11–15/group). *P < 0.05 versus CTL+mimic C; #P < 0.05 versus MES+mimic C.
Figure 4Effect of cigarette smoke exposure and let‐7f treatment on PAC number and function. A and C. Representative pictures (A) and quantification (C) of triple‐stained PACs (DAPI, BS‐1 lectin‐FITC and DiI‐acLDL) in control mice (CTL) and in MES treated with let‐7f or a scrambled miR control (mimic C). B and D. Representative pictures (B) and quantification (D) of PACs (red) adhesion to HUVECs (blue) in the different groups. E–F. VEGF‐induced migration (E) was assessed using a modified Boyden chamber assay and proliferation (F) was measured using an MTS assay. Data are mean ± S.E.M. (n = 4/group). *P < 0.05 versus CTL+mimic C; #P < 0.05 versus MES+mimic C.
Figure 5Effect of cigarette smoke exposure and Let‐7f treatment on TGF‐βR1/ALK5 pathway. Representative images and quantification of Western blots of ALK5, p‐SMAD2/3, p‐SMAD1/5 and PAI‐1 in the ischaemic muscles of mice (A–D) and in HUVECs (E–H) after different treatments. Protein expression was normalized to β‐actin. Data are mean ± S.E.M. n = 4/group (mice) and n = 3/group (HUVECs). *P < 0.05 versus CTL+mimic C, #P < 0.05 versus MES+ mimic C or CSE+mimic C.
Figure 6Effect of ALK‐5 inhibition on HUVEC functions. Representative Western blot (A) and quantification (B) of p‐SMAD2/3 in HUVECs exposed or not to CSE and treated or not with ALK5 inhibitor SB431542. C–F. Representative images and quantification of Matrigel assays (C and E) and scratch assays (D and F) in the different treatment groups. Data are mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3–4/group). *P < 0.05 versus CTL; #P < 0.05 versus CSE.