| Literature DB >> 28344223 |
Rajni Garg1, Naba K Dutta2, Namita Roy Choudhury3.
Abstract
Graphene is a two dimenEntities:
Keywords: bandgap; functionality; graphene; graphene oxide (GO); high occupied molecular orbital (HOMO); hole transporting layer (HTL); lower occupied molecular orbital (LUMO); reduced GO (RGO); work function (WF)
Year: 2014 PMID: 28344223 PMCID: PMC5304665 DOI: 10.3390/nano4020267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1History of scientific publications on carbon-based materials: (a) Total annual number of publications for each carbon allotrope based on Scopus; (b) History of the number of publications in graphene from different countries; (c) History of the number of publications on grapheme based on different subject areas.
Figure 2The common naturally-occurring sp2 and sp3 allotropes of carbon occur in different crystallographic forms. Graphite: Hexagonal; stacked flat layers of 3-coordinated sp2 C. Diamond: Cubic; framework of 4-coordinated sp3 C. Lonsdaleite: Hexagonal; framework of 4-coordinated sp3 C. Fullerenes: Closed cage molecules sp2 C: C60, C70, C76, etc. Nanotubes cylindrical fibers of sp2 C, single tubes or nested. Graphene: one-atom-thick graphitic layers with sp2 bonding. Reprinted with permission from [3]. Copyright 2013 Mineralogical Society of America.
Figure 3Schematic representation of the hexagonal arrangement of the carbon atoms in graphene. It can be reduced into two interpenetrating sub-lattices of carbon atoms with inversion symmetry between them. Atoms from different sub-lattices (A and B) are marked by different colors. Reprinted with permission from [6]. Copyright 2007 Elsevier.
Figure 4(a) Energy bands near the Fermi level in graphene. The first Brillouin zone of graphene is illustrated in the horizontal plane and labelled with some points of interest. The conduction and valence bands cross at points K and K'—the two non-equivalent corners of the zone, also known as the Dirac points; (b) Conic energy bands in the vicinity of the K and K' points; (c) Density of states near the Fermi level with Fermi energy EF. Reprinted with permission from [7]. Copyright 2009 Nature publishing group.
Different methods for synthesis of single or multilayer graphene.
| Method | Precursor | Electronic quality | Advantage | Disadvantage | Commercialization | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Exfoliation | Graphite | High | Inexpensive and time saving method | Flakes randomly distributed, poor yield | Not scalable for commercialization | [ |
| Arc discharge method | Graphite | High | Applicable to obtain Boron or nitrogen doped graphene | Cannot obtain pure graphene | Not scalable | [ |
| Wet chemical synthesis such as Hummer, Brodie | Graphite | High | Transparent conductive film, useful to synthesis graphene based composites | Presence of oxygen impurities are not suitable for most of the electronic applications | Can be obtained in lab but not good enough for commercialization | [ |
| Chemical vapour deposition | Hydrocarbons | High | Promising method that has all the above mentioned advantages | Transfer of graphene films deteriorates graphene quality and causes wrinkle formation | Possible | [ |
| Solvothermal synthesis | Ethanol | Not available | Cheap and easily available precursor | Popcorn effect arises due to nucleation of sheets | Scalable | [ |
| Epitaxial growth on metals | Ultrathin graphitic film | High | Single to multi layer graphene sheets can be obtained | Requires high temperature, expensive and difficult transfer process | Not feasible | [ |
Figure 5Schematic representation of the synthesis of single/few layer graphene from graphite: An oxidative treatment is initially performed to generate graphite oxide; which is followed by exfoliation to produce graphene oxide. Finally, (i) Thermal reduction; (ii) Chemical reduction or (iii) Electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide produces reduced graphene (r-GO).
Figure 6Work function tunability in rGO structures. (a) Calculated work function of carbonyl-rich and hydroxyl-rich rGO structures with different oxygen content; (b) The effect of individual functional groups on the work function of rGO, for two different total oxygen concentrations of 1.5% (for validation purpose) and of 20%. Change in Work function in rGO structures with respect to its functional groups. Reprinted with permission from [118]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7(a) Bar graph of contact surface potential difference (CPD) as a function of oxygen content at different stages in graphene synthesis; and (b) Linear fitting of CPD variation during decreasing oxygen content at different stages from graphite oxide to graphene. Reprinted with permission from [119]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.
Figure 8GO reduction mechanism. Routes1–3 and 2’represents the mechanism for hydrazine de-epoxidation of GO. Routes 4–5 represent the mechanism for thermal dehydroxylation for GO. Routes 6 and 7 represent the mechanism for thermal decarbonylation and thermal decarboxylation of GO. Reprinted with permission from [128]. Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society.
Figure 9Effect of GO treatment on the properties of GO. (a) Shows increase in transmittance with respect to wavelength and (b) Shows decrease in sheet resistance with respect to hydrazine treatment, whereas (c) Shows percentage of N-doping and work function modulation with no hydrazine pre-treatment, and (d) With hydrazine pre-treatment plotted again H2/NH3 ratio. Reprinted with permission from [129]. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.
Figure 10Formation of GO–OSO3H. Reprinted with permission from [132]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
Figure 11Work functions of graphene can be widely tuned using direct surface functionalization, which is demonstrated by self-assembled monolayers anchored onto the surfaces of the r-GO. Charge-transport characteristics of r-GO field-effect transistors (FETs) functionalized with the various self-assembled monolayers (SAMs). The inset of (a) shows the device configuration, where r-GO was used as an active layer. (a) Output characteristics of pristine r-GO FETs; (b) Transfer characteristics (V D = −1 V) of various r-GO FETs: APTS-rGO (left), pr-GO (middle), and FTS-r-GO (right). The insets show schematic band diagrams of SAM-functionalized r-GOs; (c) Comparative plots of Dirac voltages of the r-GO FETs. Reprinted with permission from [138]. Copyright 2013 Wiley-VCH.
Figure 12Change in WF with respect to doping time. Reprinted with permission from [60]. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.
Figure 13Schematic diagrams of near-ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (NUV-LEDs) with (a) multi-layer graphene (MLG) and (b) Au-doped MLG TCLs; (c) SEM images of MLG and (d) Au-doped MLG. Reprinted with permission from [155]. Copyright 2013 AIP Publishing.
Figure 14Schematic representation of the Dirac point state and morphological state of graphene according to sample treatment condition. Schematic representation of morphological state of graphene, before treatment, after treatment and after annealing are shown (left to right). Reprinted with permission from [156]. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 15Schematic diagram showing the electron transfer mechanism from different energy levels of the Graphene-ZnO-Au heterostructure for the photo-reduction of nitrobenzene. Reprinted with permission from [146]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.
Work function data for graphene based noble metal composites.
| S.No. | Modified Graphene | Method | Precursor | WF (eV) | Improved property | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graphene-ZnO-Au | Hydrothermal | Zn Acetate , HAuCl4 | Value not given | Efficiency = 3.5–4.5 fold more than ZnO | Removing pollutant (nitrobenzene) | [ |
| 2 | Various Au dopants on graphene | Chemical doping | AuBr3, Au2S, Au(OH)3, AuCl3 | 5, 4.8, 4.6, 4.9 as doped and 4.5, 4.4, 4.55, 4.3 eV as annealed (w.r.t. the precursor) | Multiuse of graphene due to tunable WF property | Energy conversion devices and sensors | [ |
| 3 | Au/graphene | Chemical doping | AuCl3 | Increase by 0.5 eV with increase in doping time | Tunable WF property | Optoelectronic devices | [ |
| 4 | Ag/graphene | Photochemical silver functionalization | AgNO3 | Value not given | Suppressed e-h recombination | Efficient removal of hazardous materials | [ |
| 5 | Au/Ag/Pt-graphene | Graphene adsorption metal substrate | Au, Ag, Pt substrates were used | 5.54–4.74, 4.92–4.24, 6.13–4.8 eV | Multipurpose modified graphene | Energy conversion devices | [ |