| Literature DB >> 30400651 |
Zikai Jiang1,2, Weigen Chen3,4, Lingfeng Jin5,6, Fang Cui7,8, Zihao Song9,10, Chengzhi Zhu11.
Abstract
The development of functionalized metal oxide/reducedEntities:
Keywords: WO3 nanolamellae; acetylene sensing performance; dissolved gases in transformer oil; gas sensing mechanism; reduced graphene oxide
Year: 2018 PMID: 30400651 PMCID: PMC6265835 DOI: 10.3390/nano8110909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) Schematic diagram of the tungsten trioxide/reduced graphene oxide (WO3/rGO) nanocomposites ceramic planar gas sensor; (b) Photographs of the blank sensor (front); (c) Photographs of the blank sensor (back); and, (d) Photographs of the well-fabricated sensor.
Figure 2Gas sensing test system.
Figure 3(a) A X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of graphite oxide (GO) and rGO; (b) XRD patterns of WO3 and different concentrations of WO3/rGO nanocomposites.
Figure 4(a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of pure WO3 nanolamellae; (b) high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of WO3 nanolamellae; (c) TEM image of WG1 nanocomposites; and, (d) HRTEM image of WG1 nanocomposites.
Figure 5Raman spectra of rGO, GO, WG1, and WO3 nanocomposites.
Figure 6XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) spectra of WG1 nanocomposites.
Figure 7(a) High-resolution XPS spectra in the vicinity of the W 4f peaks; (b) O 1s peak; (c) C 1s peak of WG1; and, (d) C 1s peaks of rGO.
Figure 8Thermogravimetric analyses-derivative thermogravimetric analysis-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC-DTG) curves of prepared WG1 sample.
Figure 9Photoluminescence (PL) emission spectra for pure WO3 and WG1 nanocomposite. WO3-rGO*: the mechanical mixture of WO3 and rGO (1 wt % GO).
Figure 10(a) Response of W0G, WG0, WG0.5, WG1, WG2, and WG4 to 50 ppm C2H2 at different operating temperature; (b) Resistance of W0G, WG0, WG0.5, WG1, WG2, and WG4 at different operating temperature in air.
Figure 11(a) Sensor response variation for 50 ppm C2H2 at 150 °C; (b) Dynamic sensing transient of WG1 senor to 50 ppm C2H2 gas; and, (c) Response under different gas concentrations from 0.5 ppm to 50 ppm for C2H2 of WG1 at 150 °C.
Figure 12(a) Corresponding response variations of the WG1 sensor as a function of C2H2 gas concentrations at 150 °C; and, (b) Linear relationship between response and concentrations at low concentrations.
Figure 13(a) The stability of W0G, WG0, and WG1 to 50 ppm C2H2 gas at 150°C; and, (b) The repeatability of WG1 gas sensor to 50 ppm C2H2 gas at 150°C.
Comparison between our work and other reported work on C2H2 gas detection.
| Ref | Materials | Temperature/°C | Measuring Range/ppm | Response | τResponse/s | τRecovery/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | WO3 nanorod | 300 | 35 (200 ppm) | 10 | 9 | |
| [ | WO3 nanowire | 300 | 60 (200 ppm) | 6 | 7 | |
| [ | ZnO NPs 1 | >300 | 30–1000 | 6.4 (100 ppm) | >2 min | >3 min |
| [ | Ag-ZnO NPs-rGO | 150 | 1–1000 | 21.2 (100 ppm) | 25 | 80 |
| [ | ZnO Hrc 2 | >300 | 30–1000 | 11.2 (100 ppm) | >2 min | >6 min |
| [ | Ag-ZnO Hrc-rGO | 200 | 3–1000 | 12.3 (100 ppm) | 43 | 100 |
| [ | Pure SnO2 | 300 | 200–10,000 | 6.3 (10,000 ppm) | 34 | >10 min |
| [ | Pt/ZnO | 300 | 5–10,000 | 1.1 (50 ppm) | N/A | N/A |
| [ | Ag-ZnO Hrc | 200 | 1–1000 | 57 (50 ppm) | N/A | N/A |
| Our | WG1 | 150 | 1–500 | 15 (50 ppm) | 52 | 21 |
1 Nps: Nanoparticles, 2 Hrc: Hierarchical.
Figure 14Energy band models for C2H2 gas sensing mechanisms of pure rGO nanosheets.
Figure 15(a) Representative physical models for C2H2 gas sensing mechanism of WG0; and, (b) Energy band models for C2H2 gas sensing mechanisms of WG0.
Figure 16(a) Representative physical models for C2H2 gas sensing mechanism of WG1; and, (b) Representative physical models for C2H2 gas sensing mechanism of WG2 and WG4.