Literature DB >> 28341751

Low Recombination Proficiency Score (RPS) Predicts Heightened Sensitivity to DNA-Damaging Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Sean P Pitroda1,2, Riyue Bao3, Jorge Andrade3, Ralph R Weichselbaum1,2, Philip P Connell4.   

Abstract

Purpose: Molecular-based cancer tests have been developed to augment the standard clinical and pathologic features used to tailor treatments to individual breast cancer patients. Homologous recombination (HR) repairs double-stranded DNA breaks and promotes tolerance to lesions that disrupt DNA replication. Recombination Proficiency Score (RPS) quantifies HR efficiency based on the expression of four genes involved in DNA damage repair. We hypothesized low RPS values can identify HR-deficient breast cancers most sensitive to DNA-damaging chemotherapy.Experimental Design: We collected pathologic tumor responses and tumor gene expression values for breast cancer patients that were prospectively enrolled on clinical trials involving preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery (N = 513). We developed an algorithm to calculate breast cancer-specific RPS (RPSb) values on an individual sample basis.
Results: Low RPSb tumors are approximately twice as likely to exhibit a complete pathologic response or minimal residual disease to preoperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy as compared with high RPSb tumors. Basal, HER2-enriched, and luminal B breast cancer subtypes exhibit low RPSb values. In addition, RPSb predicts treatment responsiveness after controlling for clinical and pathologic features, as well as intrinsic breast subtype.Conclusions: Overall, our findings indicate that low RPS breast cancers exhibit aggressive features at baseline, but they have heightened sensitivity to DNA-damaging chemotherapy. Low RPSb values in basal, HER2-enriched, and luminal B subtypes provide a mechanistic explanation for their clinical behaviors and genomic instability. RPSb augments standard clinical and pathologic features used to tailor treatments, thereby enabling more personalized treatment strategies for individual breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4493-500. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28341751      PMCID: PMC5540755          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  38 in total

1.  Molecular classification of breast carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization: a specific somatic genetic profile for BRCA1 tumors.

Authors:  Lodewyk F A Wessels; Tibor van Welsem; Augustinus A M Hart; Laura J van't Veer; Marcel J T Reinders; Petra M Nederlof
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Prediction of BRCA2-association in hereditary breast carcinomas using array-CGH.

Authors:  Simon A Joosse; Kim I M Brandwijk; Peter Devilee; Jelle Wesseling; Frans B L Hogervorst; Senno Verhoef; Petra M Nederlof
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  GSTP1 expression predicts poor pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomohiro Miyake; Takahiro Nakayama; Yasuto Naoi; Noriaki Yamamoto; Yoko Otani; Seung J Kim; Kenzo Shimazu; Atsushi Shimomura; Naomi Maruyama; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.716

5.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Hallmarks of 'BRCAness' in sporadic cancers.

Authors:  Nicholas Turner; Andrew Tutt; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Cell line derived multi-gene predictor of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a validation study on US Oncology 02-103 clinical trial.

Authors:  Kui Shen; Yuan Qi; Nan Song; Chunqiao Tian; Shara D Rice; Michael J Gabrin; Stacey L Brower; William Fraser Symmans; Joyce A O'Shaughnessy; Frankie A Holmes; Lina Asmar; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Genomic patterns resembling BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated breast cancers predict benefit of intensified carboplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marieke A Vollebergh; Esther H Lips; Petra M Nederlof; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Jelle Wesseling; Marc J Vd Vijver; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Harm van Tinteren; Jos Jonkers; Michael Hauptmann; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Sabine C Linn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  MicroRNAs as the critical regulators of Doxorubicin resistance in breast tumor cells.

Authors:  Amir Sadra Zangouei; Maliheh Alimardani; Meysam Moghbeli
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  Homologous repair deficiency score for identifying breast cancers with defective DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ahrum Min; Kwangsoo Kim; Kyeonghun Jeong; Seongmin Choi; Seongyeong Kim; Koung Jin Suh; Kyung-Hun Lee; Sun Kim; Seock-Ah Im
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Integrative analysis of histopathological images and chromatin accessibility data for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Siwen Xu; Zixiao Lu; Wei Shao; Christina Y Yu; Jill L Reiter; Qianjin Feng; Weixing Feng; Kun Huang; Yunlong Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.063

4.  PARPBP is a prognostic marker and confers anthracycline resistance to breast cancer.

Authors:  Bo Chen; Jianguo Lai; Danian Dai; Rong Chen; Ning Liao; Guanfeng Gao; Hailin Tang
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 8.168

5.  Obesity-related proteins score as a potential marker of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sha Diao; Xueyao Wu; Xiaofan Zhang; Yu Hao; Bin Xu; Xu Li; Lulu Tian; Yunqi Miao; Xunying Zhao; Feng Ye; Jiayuan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Targeting homologous recombination addicted tumors: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Talia Golan; Jonathan R Brody
Journal:  Ann Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2020-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.