Literature DB >> 22320227

GSTP1 expression predicts poor pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-negative breast cancer.

Tomohiro Miyake1, Takahiro Nakayama, Yasuto Naoi, Noriaki Yamamoto, Yoko Otani, Seung J Kim, Kenzo Shimazu, Atsushi Shimomura, Naomi Maruyama, Yasuhiro Tamaki, Shinzaburo Noguchi.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) expression with resistance to neoadjuvant paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (P-FEC) in human breast cancers. The relationship of GSTP1 expression and GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation with intrinsic subtypes was also investigated. In this study, primary breast cancer patients (n = 123, stage II-III) treated with neoadjuvant P-FEC were analyzed. Tumor samples were obtained by vacuum-assisted core biopsy before P-FEC. GSTP1 expression was determined using immunohistochemistry, GSTP1 promoter methylation index (MI) using bisulfite methylation assay and intrinsic subtypes using DNA microarray. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was significantly higher in GSTP1-negative tumors (80.0%) than GSTP1-positive tumors (30.6%) (P = 0.009) among estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors but not among ER-positive tumors (P = 0.267). Multivariate analysis showed that GSTP1 was the only predictive factor for pCR (P = 0.013) among ER-negative tumors. Luminal A, luminal B and HER2-enriched tumors showed a significantly lower GSTP1 positivity than basal-like tumors (P = 0.002, P < 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively), while luminal A, luminal B and HER2-enriched tumors showed a higher GSTP1 MI than basal-like tumors (P = 0.076, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, these results suggest the possibility that GSTP1 expression can predict pathological response to P-FEC in ER-negative tumors but not in ER-positive tumors. Additionally, GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation might be implicated more importantly in the pathogenesis of luminal A, luminal B and HER2-enriched tumors than basal-like tumors.
© 2012 Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22320227     DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


  71 in total

1.  Low Recombination Proficiency Score (RPS) Predicts Heightened Sensitivity to DNA-Damaging Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sean P Pitroda; Riyue Bao; Jorge Andrade; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Philip P Connell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Genome-Scale Signatures of Gene Interaction from Compound Screens Predict Clinical Efficacy of Targeted Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Peng Jiang; Winston Lee; Xujuan Li; Carl Johnson; Jun S Liu; Myles Brown; Jon Christopher Aster; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 10.304

3.  B Cells and T Follicular Helper Cells Mediate Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in High Mutation Burden Mouse Models of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Hollern; Nuo Xu; Aatish Thennavan; Cherise Glodowski; Susana Garcia-Recio; Kevin R Mott; Xiaping He; Joseph P Garay; Kelly Carey-Ewend; David Marron; John Ford; Siyao Liu; Sarah C Vick; Miguel Martin; Joel S Parker; Benjamin G Vincent; Jonathan S Serody; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  ABCG2 is a potential marker of tumor-initiating cells in breast cancer.

Authors:  Renata Danielle Sicchieri; Willian Abraham da Silveira; Larissa Raquel Mouro Mandarano; Tatiane Mendes Gonçalves de Oliveira; Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Jurandyr Moreira de Andrade; Daniel Guimarães Tiezzi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-20

5.  Epigenetic CpG Methylation of the Promoter and Reactivation of the Expression of GSTP1 by Astaxanthin in Human Prostate LNCaP Cells.

Authors:  Yuqing Yang; Francisco Fuentes; Limin Shu; Chao Wang; Doug Pung; Wenji Li; Chengyue Zhang; Yue Guo; Ah-Ng Kong
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Imaging features of triple-negative breast cancers according to androgen receptor status.

Authors:  Rosalind P Candelaria; Beatriz E Adrada; Wei Wei; Alastair M Thompson; Lumarie Santiago; Deanna L Lane; Monica L Huang; Elsa M Arribas; Gaiane M Rauch; W Fraser Symmans; Michael Z Gilcrease; Lei Huo; Bora Lim; Naoto T Ueno; Stacy L Moulder; Wei Tse Yang
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  A novel animal model for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria V Bogachek; Jung Min Park; James P De Andrade; Mikhail V Kulak; Jeffrey R White; Tong Wu; Philip M Spanheimer; Thomas B Bair; Alicia K Olivier; Ronald J Weigel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  COEXPEDIA: exploring biomedical hypotheses via co-expressions associated with medical subject headings (MeSH).

Authors:  Sunmo Yang; Chan Yeong Kim; Sohyun Hwang; Eiru Kim; Hyojin Kim; Hongseok Shim; Insuk Lee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Epigenetics of breast cancer: Modifying role of environmental and bioactive food compounds.

Authors:  Donato F Romagnolo; Kevin D Daniels; Jonathan T Grunwald; Stephan A Ramos; Catherine R Propper; Ornella I Selmin
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 10.  Pharmacogenomics of breast cancer therapy: an update.

Authors:  Kelly Westbrook; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 12.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.