Xin Hu1,2, Emmanuel Martinez-Ledesma1, Siyuan Zheng1, Hoon Kim1,3, Floris Barthel1,3, Tao Jiang4, Kenneth R Hess5, Roel G W Verhaak1,6,3. 1. Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 2. Program of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, The University of Texas-Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas 3. Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China 5. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 6. Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Abstract
Background: Co-deletion of 1p and 19q marks a diffuse glioma subtype associated with relatively favorable overall survival; however, heterogeneous clinical outcomes are observed within this category. Methods: We assembled gene expression profiles and sample annotation of 374 glioma patients carrying the 1p/19q co-deletion. We predicted 1p/19q status using gene expression when annotation was missing. A first cohort was randomly split into training (n = 170) and a validation dataset (n = 163). A second validation set consisted of 41 expression profiles. An elastic-net penalized Cox proportional hazards model was applied to build a classifier model through cross-validation within the training dataset. Results: The selected 35-gene signature was used to identify high-risk and low-risk groups in the validation set, which showed significantly different overall survival (P = .00058, log-rank test). For time-to-death events, the high-risk group predicted by the gene signature yielded a hazard ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.11). The signature was also significantly associated with clinical outcome in the The Cancer Genome Atlas (CGA) IDH-mutant 1p/19q wild-type and IDH-wild-type glioma cohorts. Pathway analysis suggested that high risk was associated with increased acetylation activity and inflammatory response. Tumor purity was found to be significantly decreased in high-risk IDH-mutant with 1p/19q co-deletion gliomas and IDH-wild-type glioblastomas but not in IDH-wild-type lower grade or IDH-mutant, non-co-deleted gliomas. Conclusion: We identified a 35-gene signature that identifies high-risk and low-risk categories of 1p/19q positive glioma patients. We have demonstrated heterogeneity amongst a relatively new glioma subtype and provided a stepping stone towards risk stratification.
Background: Co-deletion of 1p and 19q marks a diffuse glioma subtype associated with relatively favorable overall survival; however, heterogeneous clinical outcomes are observed within this category. Methods: We assembled gene expression profiles and sample annotation of 374 gliomapatients carrying the 1p/19q co-deletion. We predicted 1p/19q status using gene expression when annotation was missing. A first cohort was randomly split into training (n = 170) and a validation dataset (n = 163). A second validation set consisted of 41 expression profiles. An elastic-net penalized Cox proportional hazards model was applied to build a classifier model through cross-validation within the training dataset. Results: The selected 35-gene signature was used to identify high-risk and low-risk groups in the validation set, which showed significantly different overall survival (P = .00058, log-rank test). For time-to-death events, the high-risk group predicted by the gene signature yielded a hazard ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.11). The signature was also significantly associated with clinical outcome in the The Cancer Genome Atlas (CGA) IDH-mutant 1p/19q wild-type and IDH-wild-type glioma cohorts. Pathway analysis suggested that high risk was associated with increased acetylation activity and inflammatory response. Tumor purity was found to be significantly decreased in high-risk IDH-mutant with 1p/19q co-deletion gliomas and IDH-wild-type glioblastomas but not in IDH-wild-type lower grade or IDH-mutant, non-co-deleted gliomas. Conclusion: We identified a 35-gene signature that identifies high-risk and low-risk categories of 1p/19q positive gliomapatients. We have demonstrated heterogeneity amongst a relatively new glioma subtype and provided a stepping stone towards risk stratification.
Authors: William A Freije; F Edmundo Castro-Vargas; Zixing Fang; Steve Horvath; Timothy Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Paul S Mischel; Stanley F Nelson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: H M Bøvelstad; S Nygård; H L Størvold; M Aldrin; Ø Borgan; A Frigessi; O C Lingjaerde Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2007-06-06 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Wandaliz Torres-García; Siyuan Zheng; Andrey Sivachenko; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Qianghu Wang; Rong Yao; Michael F Berger; John N Weinstein; Gad Getz; Roel G W Verhaak Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Kosuke Yoshihara; Maria Shahmoradgoli; Emmanuel Martínez; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Hoon Kim; Wandaliz Torres-Garcia; Victor Treviño; Hui Shen; Peter W Laird; Douglas A Levine; Scott L Carter; Gad Getz; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Gordon B Mills; Roel G W Verhaak Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Tejus A Bale; Justin T Jordan; Otto Rapalino; Nisha Ramamurthy; Nicholas Jessop; John C DeWitt; Valentina Nardi; Maria Martinez-Lage Alvarez; Matthew Frosch; Tracy T Batchelor; David N Louis; A John Iafrate; Daniel P Cahill; Jochen K Lennerz Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Marta Penas-Prado; Jing Wu; Daniel P Cahill; Daniel J Brat; Joseph F Costello; Paul G Kluetz; J Gregory Cairncross; Martin van den Bent; Roel G W Verhaak; Orwa Aboud; Peter Burger; Susan M Chang; Christine Cordova; Raymond Y Huang; Lindsay S Rowe; Martin J B Taphoorn; Mark R Gilbert; Terri S Armstrong Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2019-12-06