Literature DB >> 28338959

Increase in leaf temperature opens stomata and decouples net photosynthesis from stomatal conductance in Pinus taeda and Populus deltoides x nigra.

Josef Urban1,2, Miles W Ingwers3, Mary Anne McGuire4, Robert O Teskey4.   

Abstract

The effect of temperature on stomatal conductance (gs) and corresponding gas exchange parameters was studied in two tree species with contrasting leaf anatomy and ecophysiology-a broadleaf angiosperm, Populus deltoides x nigra (poplar), and a needle-leaf gymnosperm, Pinus taeda (loblolly pine). Experiments were conducted in growth chambers across a leaf temperature range of 19-48°C. Manipulations of temperature were done in well-watered and drought soil conditions and under ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (800 ppm) air CO2 concentrations. Increases in leaf temperature caused stomatal opening at both ambient and elevated [CO2]. The gs increased by 42% in poplar and by 40% in loblolly pine when leaf temperature increased from 30°C to 40°C at a vapour pressure difference of 1 kPa. Stomatal limitation to photosynthesis decreased in elevated temperature in loblolly pine but not in poplar. The ratio of net photosynthesis to gs depended on leaf temperature, especially at high temperatures. Evaporative cooling of transpiring leaves resulted in reductions in leaf temperature up to 9°C in well-watered poplar but only 1°C in drought-stressed poplar and in loblolly pine. As global mean temperatures rise and temperature extremes become more frequent and severe, understanding the effect of temperature on gs, and modelling that relationship, will become increasingly important.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ball–Berry model; elevated temperature; evaporative cooling; global change; heat waves; stomatal conductance.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338959      PMCID: PMC5444456          DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


Introduction

Plant stomata play a key role in water and carbon cycles. On average, plant transpiration accounts for 61% of global evapotranspiration (Schlesinger and Jasechko, 2014). In other words, most water moving from terrestrial ecosystems into the atmosphere passes through plants and the precise amount is regulated by stomata. At the same time, stomatal conductance (gs) is a key factor determining the rate of net photosynthesis (A) and, therefore, the global carbon cycle and plant carbon metabolism. As a result, stomatal regulation is one of the main factors which determine local growth and survival of plants and global cycles of mass and energy. Stomatal conductance is so important that it has become central to many models from the leaf level (Ball ; Leuning ; Jarvis and Davies, 1998; Tuzet ), to the tree- and forest-stand level (Mirfenderesgi ; Xu ), and even up to the global level (Niyogi ; Berry, 2012; Verhoef and Egea, 2014). However, the conditions in which plants grow are changing and we still do not know enough about plant stomatal regulation to predict future stomatal responses of plant species and their effects at ecosystem and global scales (Lin ). Temperature is one of the most variable factors in the environment and it affects many plant physiological processes, yet little is known about its effect on gs, especially at high temperatures (Teskey ). Historically, temperatures over 40°C have been recorded in many places in North America. It has been predicted that mean maximum summer temperatures will increase 5°C in the eastern US within this century (Lynn ). Here, we studied effects of temperature on the leaf gas exchange of two North American tree species, Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) and Populus deltoides x nigra (hybrid poplar). Loblolly pine is native to the south-eastern US where the highest temperatures recorded among the 12 states in the region range from 43 to 49°C, with a mean maximum temperature for all 12 states of 45°C (National Climatic Data Center, 2016). Hybrid poplar is widely planted in the Northern Great Plains, which includes the states of Nebraska, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota. The highest recorded temperatures in those states range from 46 to 49°C with a mean of 48°C. In addition to increases in mean air temperature (Ta), the frequency of extreme temperatures and the severity of heat waves have also increased, and are likely to increase further (Meehl and Tebaldi, 2004; Perkins ). Summertime extreme temperatures associated with prolonged heat waves now impact approximately 10% of land surfaces, up from 1% in the 1960s (Hansen ). Over recent decades record-breaking monthly temperature extremes have occurred five times more often than during the late 19th through the mid-20th century (Coumou and Robinson, 2013). Heat waves are usually associated with low precipitation and soil drought (Ciais ; Stéfanon ). However, the frequency of heat waves during wet periods is also increasing. When temperature and precipitation were compared between the periods of 1951–1977 and 1978–2004, it was apparent that both wet/hot and dry/hot conditions were increasing substantially worldwide (Hao ). Effects of the increasing frequency and severity of extreme temperature events on gs are largely unknown. Results of experiments that examined the direct dependence of gs on temperature have not been consistent. Previous studies have reported a complete range of responses to increased temperature, including stomatal opening (Schulze ; Freeden and Sage, 1999; Lu ; Mott and Peak, 2010), no significant response (Teskey ; Sage and Sharkey, 1987; Cerasoli ; von Caemmerer and Evans, 2015), and stomatal closure (Raven ; Weston and Bauerle, 2007; Lahr ). A peaked response with maximum gs at 20°C (Way ) or more complex responses with one peak between 20 and 30°C and an additional increase at extremely high temperatures (Slot ) have also been described. One possible explanation for these inconsistent results is that to isolate the direct effect of temperature on gs requires a well-controlled environment, which is often hard to achieve, particularly with respect to vapour pressure difference (VPD). In addition, differences in sensitivity to heat are likely related to species, whether plants were grown in the laboratory or in the field, and the range of measurement temperature (Slot ). It has been well established that plants regulate rates of transpiration and photosynthesis in parallel, maintaining a balance between gs and A (Lawson ). Therefore, the effect of temperature on stomata is often considered to be indirect, through VPD, transpiration, leaf water potential, or the effect of temperature on photosynthesis or intercellular [CO2] (Ci). This parallel regulation results in the conservation Ci at a given atmospheric [CO2] (Ca) and a close correspondence between gs and A (Wong ; Hetherington and Woodward, 2003). The latter relationship has been central to several models of stomatal control of photosynthesis (Farquhar and Wong, 1984; Ball ; Leuning, 1995; Buckley ), which assume that the ratio of gs correlates with A over a wide range of environmental conditions. However, some studies indicated that this relationship was decoupled under extreme temperature during heat waves, such that A decreased, but gs did not. For example, during an imposed heat wave in which daily maximum Ta ranged from 47 to 53°C and VPD ranged from 6 to 8 kPa, Pinus taeda and Quercus rubra seedlings exhibited progressively lower A on each day of the heat wave but almost no change in gs (Ameye ). Similarly, gs of Acer rubrum changed very little across a temperature range of 35 to 48°C (Weston and Bauerle, 2007). In a study of five species, gs either increased or did not decline as Ta increased from 20 to 40°C, even though A initially increased from 20 to 30°C and then decreased (von Caemmerer and Evans, 2015). Collectively these studies suggest that the mechanism modulating stomatal aperture may be independent of A at higher temperatures. However, because VPD varied with temperature in all of these studies, it could not be determined to what degree the observed changes in gs were due to a change in VPD or in the A, or were a direct response to temperature. In this study, we addressed the following questions: (i) What is the direct effect of moderate to high temperature on gs? (ii) Is the effect of moderate to high temperature on gs altered by water stress or Ca? (iii) How does the response of gs to temperature link to other related factors such as A, Ci, and water status (transpiration, water potential), and how does the correlation between gs and A, which is crucial to many models, change with temperature? (iv) What is the magnitude of evaporative cooling under extreme temperatures? To answer these questions we performed leaf gas exchange measurements on two contrasting tree species: poplar (Populus deltoides x nigra) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) across a range of temperature and humidity and under well-watered and drought-stress conditions.

Material and methods

Growth chambers and tree material

Trees were grown, and measurements conducted, in two walk-in growth chambers (EGC 36, Environmental Growth Chambers, Chagrin Falls, OH, USA) at the University of Georgia campus in Athens, GA, USA. Prior to the start of experimental treatments, the trees were grown in the chambers for 30 days at 26°C/ 23°C (day/night) Ta, 1700/560 Pa (day/night) air VPD, and a daily light period of 13 hours. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in the chambers was 520 μmol m−2 s−1. Air speed in each chamber was maintained at 1 m s−1. During the growth period the Ca was maintained above 400 µmol mol−1 as follows: a CO2 sensor (GMM 220, Vaisala, Helsinki, Finland) monitored [CO2] in each chamber and controlled a solenoid valve that released CO2 from a compressed gas cylinder into the chamber whenever the [CO2] fell below the 400 µmol mol−1 set point. Although this procedure prevented the [CO2] from decreasing below 400 µmol mol−1 during periods of active photosynthesis, it did not prevent increases above 400 µmol mol−1. To mitigate the build-up of CO2 in the chambers, the exterior room windows were fully opened and a large exhaust fan was placed in one window. We estimate that daytime ambient [CO2] in the chambers was typically between 400 and 475 µmol mol−1. Measurements were made on clones of two tree species: a poplar (Populus deltoides x nigra) clone obtained as cuttings (OP-367, hybridpoplars.com, Glenmoore, PA, USA) and a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) clone from the South Carolina Coastal Plain (Arborgen, Ridgeville, SC, USA). Two-year-old loblolly pine saplings, originally grown in 4-L pots in a greenhouse under natural temperature fluctuations with temperatures commonly reaching ~ 40°C, and poplar cuttings were planted in March 2014 into 15-L pots in a potting medium (Cofer’s Nursery Mix, Cofer’s, Athens, GA, USA). Each pot was fertilized with 40 g of 15-9-12 extended release fertilizer (Osmocote Plus #903286, Scotts-Sierra Horticultural Products, Marysville, OH, USA) and 0.2 g of chelated iron (Sprint 138, Becker Underwood, Ames, IA, USA). Trees were watered daily to full soil water capacity. At the beginning of the experiment, in April 2014, the mean stem height of the poplars was 1.05 m, and the diameter 10 cm above soil was 9.2 mm. The mean height and diameter of the loblolly pines were 1.1 m and 13.9 mm, respectively.

Gas exchange measurements

Measurements of light-saturated net photosynthesis (Asat), gs, rate of transpiration (E), and Ci were made with a portable photosynthesis system equipped with a CO2 mixer (LI-6400–20, LiCor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Leaf cuvette conditions were set as follows: block temperature was set at ambient (growth chamber) temperature; [CO2] was set at either 400 µmol mol−1 or 800 µmol mol−1, equal to the concentration in the growth chamber; relative humidity was maintained equal to that in the growth chamber; and PAR was set at 1200 µmol m−2 s−1, resulting in light-saturated photosynthesis and no decline as a result of photorespiration (see figure 2 in Ingwers for the photosynthetic light response curve of loblolly pine trees of the same clone measured in the same growth chambers). Measurements of loblolly pine foliage were made on two fully developed fascicles (six needles total) of the second flush attached to the main stem. The needles were arranged in the cuvette on a flat plane with equal spacing between needles to maximize light interception. After the gas exchange measurement, the widths of each of three sides of the needles were measured with a scale loupe and used to calculate the foliage area in the cuvette. For poplar, measurements were made on approximately the 30th leaf from the top of the plant. Gas exchange measurements were performed on six trees of each species (n=6). Gas exchange results were calculated on a total surface area basis for loblolly pine and a one-sided surface area basis for poplar.

Experimental setup

Responses to changes in temperature and VPD under various [CO2] and soil moisture

To determine stomatal responses to temperature and VPD, Ta in the growth chamber was controlled at 20, 30, 40, or 49°C and relative humidity was changed from approximately 30 to 80% at each temperature. The sequence of the temperature changes was chosen randomly and individual trees were excluded from further measurements after they had been subjected to 49°C. Six trees were allowed to acclimate for at least 45 minutes after each change in environmental conditions. At every measurement, gs, A, E, and Ci were recorded. To ensure high water availability, during the measurement period the base of each pot was placed in a 5-cm-tall container that was kept full of water. Pre-light water potential (ΨP) and water potential at varying Ta and VPD in the light were measured on foliage using a pressure chamber (model 700, PMS Instrument, Albany, OR, USA). Mean ΨP was −0.28 ± 0.02 and −0.13 ± 0.02 MPa (mean ± standard error) for loblolly pine and poplar, respectively. Measurements were conducted under ambient [CO2] (400 µmol mol−1) and elevated [CO2] (800 µmol mol−1). For measurements under elevated [CO2], the [CO2] was increased in the growth chamber to 800 µmol mol−1 as described above by reprogramming the set point of the CO2 sensor. The plants were allowed to equilibrate to elevated [CO2] for 24 hours prior to measurements. In a subsequent experiment the effect of soil water deficit on the stomatal response to temperature was investigated. After withholding water for 5 days, the mean ΨP of the poplar plants was −0.81 ± 0.10 MPa. After withholding water for 12 days, the mean ΨP of the loblolly pine plants was −0.97 ± 0.06 MPa. On those days, measurements were made using the same combinations of temperature and humidity as in the first experiment. The effect of water deficit was studied only at ambient [CO2]. The first experiment and this experiment were conducted on different trees (n=6 for each experiment).

Effect of Ci on Asat at various temperatures

Under well-watered conditions, A/Ci curves were measured in the growth chamber on six trees of each species. The VPD was held constant at 1.2 kPa at a leaf temperature (Tl) of 20°C and 3.5 kPa at a Tl of 30°C and 40°C both in the growth chamber and the cuvette. PAR in the cuvette was set at 1200 µmol m−2 s−1. The [CO2] in the cuvette was manipulated from 50 to 100 µmol mol−1 and then in 100 µmol mol−1 steps to 1800 µmol mol−1. The A/Ci Curve Fitting Utility, version 1.1 (Long and Bernacchi, 2003) was used to determine the maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax, μmol m−2 s−1), maximum rate of photosynthetic electron transport (Jmax, μmol m−2 s−1), maximum rate of triose-phosphate utilization (VTPU, μmol m−2 s−1), and day respiration in the absence of mitochondrial respiration (Rd, μmol m−2 s−1). Stomatal limitation to photosynthesis (Ls) was estimated at [CO2] 400 µmol mol−1 from fitted curves using the equation: where A0 is the light-saturated net photosynthesis rate that would occur at infinite gs (Farquhar and Sharkey, 1982).

Cooling effect

Under lighted conditions, the cooling effect of transpiration was estimated as the difference between the temperature of normal transpiring foliage and foliage greased with petroleum jelly to prevent transpiration (Jones ) at the same position on the plant. Leaves and needles were chosen for this comparison at a position on the plant close to the point where gas exchange was measured. Tl was measured with an infrared thermometer (Model 561, Fluke, Everett, WA, USA) with emissivity set to 0.97.

Statistical analysis

Prior to the analyses, the normality of data was determined using the Shapiro–Wilk test. We used linear and non-linear multiregression analysis to describe the dependence of gs on external factors (i.e. Tl, VPD). A least-squares regression was used to fit the 3D models to the data. Models used to fit data are listed in Supplementary Table S1 (available at JXB online). An F-test was used to test significance of model parameters. Analysis of the generalized linear model was used to test for differences among independent variables and a dependent variable when VPD was a continuous predictor. Tests were performed at α=0.05. Most statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot 12.5 software (Systat, San Jose, CA, USA) with the exception of the generalized linear model analysis, which was done in Statistica 12 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).

Results

Responses of gs, E, and Asat to Tl and VPD

The gs increased with increasing Tl and Ta in both species in all tested environmental conditions (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1, available at JXB online). Under unlimited soil water availability and a VPD of 1 kPa and [CO2] of 400 μmol mol−1, an increase in Tl from 30 to 40°C led to an increase in gs of 42% in poplar and 40% in loblolly pine (Fig. 1a, d; Supplementary Table S1; P < 0.001). The rate of increase in gs with temperature was linear in poplar, but gs increased more at high than at low Tl in loblolly pine. Increasing the [CO2] from 400 to 800 μmol mol−1 caused partial stomatal closure, which was more pronounced in poplar (mean decrease of 21% at VPD 3.5 kPa, P < 0.001) than in loblolly pine (mean decrease of 12% at the same VPD, P = 0.030). However, similar to results in ambient [CO2], gs increased with increasing Tl in both species under elevated [CO2] (Fig. 1b, e; P < 0.001). Soil water deficit significantly reduced gs in both species, but more so in poplar than pine (Fig. 1c, f; P < 0.001). Even though gs was reduced in drought conditions, gs of both species still increased with increasing Tl (P = 0.040 for poplar and P < 0.001 for loblolly pine).
Fig. 1.

Stomatal conductance (gs) of poplar (left panels) and loblolly pine (right panels) and its dependence on Tl and VPD. Plants were measured in high soil moisture conditions and (a, d) ambient [CO2] or (b, e) elevated [CO2]. (c, f) Measurements made on drought-stressed trees at ambient [CO2]. Linear regression was used to fit the data for poplar and non-linear regression was used for loblolly pine. Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x-and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Stomatal conductance (gs) of poplar (left panels) and loblolly pine (right panels) and its dependence on Tl and VPD. Plants were measured in high soil moisture conditions and (a, d) ambient [CO2] or (b, e) elevated [CO2]. (c, f) Measurements made on drought-stressed trees at ambient [CO2]. Linear regression was used to fit the data for poplar and non-linear regression was used for loblolly pine. Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x-and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Transpiration (E) increased significantly with increasing Tl (and Ta) or VPD in both species under unlimited soil water availability and ambient [CO2] (Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Fig. S2a, b, available at JXB online). However, the relationships between E and environmental variables differed substantially between poplar and loblolly pine. Transpiration of poplar increased with VPD (P < 0.001) but not with Tl (P = 0.06). Conversely, in loblolly pine, E increased only with Tl (P < 0.001) but not with VPD (P = 0.15).
Fig. 2.

Response of E to VPD in (a) poplar and (b) loblolly pine at varying Tl and VPD. Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x- and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Response of E to VPD in (a) poplar and (b) loblolly pine at varying Tl and VPD. Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x- and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Under well-watered conditions, Ci increased with increasing temperature in both species (Fig. 3a, c, P < 0.001, and Supplementary Fig. S2c, d). A decrease in Ci with increasing VPD was observed in poplar (P < 0.001) but not in loblolly pine (P = 0.15). In addition, the range of Ci was smaller in poplar than in loblolly pine. Tl (and Ta) had an effect on A in both species (Fig. 3b, d, P < 0.001, and Supplementary Fig. S3, available at JXB online). In both species, at a given Tl there was a specific relationship between Asat and gs. However, this relationship between Asat and gs changed with Tl (Fig. 3b, d, P < 0.001).
Fig. 3.

(a, c) Relationship between Ci, Tl, and VPD for poplar (left panels) and loblolly pine (right panels). (b, d) Relationship between Asat, Tl, and gs. Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x- and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

(a, c) Relationship between Ci, Tl, and VPD for poplar (left panels) and loblolly pine (right panels). (b, d) Relationship between Asat, Tl, and gs. Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x- and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

A/Ci curves and Ls to Asat at various Tl

Temperature had a large effect on the parameters of A/Ci curves in both poplar and loblolly pine (Table 1). Stomata of poplar imposed a smaller limitation on the diffusion of CO2 than stomata of loblolly pine. The relative Ls in poplar did not exceed 20% while in loblolly pine they were between 23 and 78%. Ls was directly comparable between 30 and 40°C because it was measured at the same VPD. While Ls in poplar did not change (P = 0.21) with a Tl increase from 30 to 40°C, Ls in loblolly pine declined under the same temperature increase (P < 0.001). The values of parameters related to biochemical processes of photosynthesis (Vcmax, Jmax, VTPU, and Rd) consistently increased with Tl in both species, with the exception of VTPU in poplar.
Table 1.

Parameters related to biochemical processes of photosynthesis in poplar and loblolly pine plants measured at three leaf temperatures

Species T l (°C) Vcmax J max V TPU R d * L s
Poplar206613210.052.100.19
3016515111.111.90.16
4030116511.463.250.2
P-value <0.001 <0.001 0.07 <0.001 0.21
Loblolly pine2021453.621.550.41
3067714.572.730.78
40163754.996.520.23
P-value <0.000 <0.001 <0.001 0.011 <0.001

Significant differences between measurements at different temperatures indicated in bold.

Parameters related to biochemical processes of photosynthesis in poplar and loblolly pine plants measured at three leaf temperatures Significant differences between measurements at different temperatures indicated in bold.

Effect of E on Tl

The temperature of transpiring leaves was lower than the temperature of foliage that did not transpire (Fig. 4). The magnitude of the temperature difference in poplars in wet soil reached up to 9.0°C and scaled with VPD (P < 0.001) but not with Ta (Fig. 4a). Transpiring leaves of poplar in dry soil were an average of 1.1°C cooler than non-transpiring leaves (P = 0.02) and the magnitude of the cooling effect depended on neither temperature nor VPD (Fig. 4b). In loblolly pine, transpiring needles were an average of 0.9°C cooler than those that did not transpire (P = 0.002). There was no effect of soil water availability and the magnitude of the cooling did not depend on temperature or VPD (Fig. 4c).
Fig. 4.

Evaporative cooling effect (temperature difference) of transpiration on (a) well-watered poplar, (b) drought-stressed poplar, and (c) loblolly pine at varying Ta and VPD. Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x- and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Evaporative cooling effect (temperature difference) of transpiration on (a) well-watered poplar, (b) drought-stressed poplar, and (c) loblolly pine at varying Ta and VPD. Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x- and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Leaf water potential

Leaf water potential decreased with increasing Tl and VPD in both species when the soil was wet (Fig. 5a, c). When soil was dry, leaf water potential scaled with both Tl and VPD in poplar, but in loblolly pine only VPD had an effect on water potential (Fig. 5b, d). At the same Tl and VPD, poplar maintained higher water potential than loblolly pine.
Fig. 5.

Leaf water potential of (a, b) poplar and (c, d) loblolly pine in wet soil (a, c) and dry soil (b, d). Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x- and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Leaf water potential of (a, b) poplar and (c, d) loblolly pine in wet soil (a, c) and dry soil (b, d). Asterisks at the z-axis label indicate overall significance of the model; asterisks at the x- and y-axes indicate significance of the respective parameters (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Discussion

Stomatal conductance, stomatal limitations, and photosynthesis

Stomata play a key role in regulating fluxes of water and carbon dioxide between plant and atmosphere. They regulate both plant growth and cycles of mass and energy. Therefore, much attention has been focused on principles of stomatal regulation and several regulatory mechanisms have been identified. Most research has centred on the stomatal responses to various indices of water status and carbon balance (Farquhar and Sharkey, 1982; Jones, 1998; Buckley ). Surprisingly little attention has been paid to the responses of gs to temperature, even though it is one of the most variable environmental factors. A few previous studies suggested a dependence of gs on temperature. However, these studies have often provided conflicting results. While some evidence suggested that gs increased with increasing temperature (Schulze ; Lu ; Mott and Peak, 2010), other studies found that temperature had no effect on stomata (Teskey ; Sage and Sharkey, 1987; Cerasoli ; von Caemmerer and Evans, 2015), or that increased temperature triggered stomatal closure (Weston and Bauerle, 2007; Lahr ). One explanation for the conflicting results across these studies might be that the experiments were often conducted in uncontrolled environmental conditions in the field. The design of our experiment, in which the response of gs to Tl was separated from the effect of VPD and all measurements were made under constant illumination, allowed us to separate the effect of temperature from the effects of other factors. Our results conclusively demonstrated that there is a strong direct positive response of gs to increasing Tl in two tree species. In well-watered trees, temperature and VPD had major effects on gs, as suggested by Freeden and Sage (1999). Elevated Ca caused a decline in gs but did not fully mitigate increased stomatal opening in response to increased temperature. The increase in gs with increased Tl was found in both species despite large differences in leaf morphology, xylem structure, and physiology. However, because of these differences, the magnitude of stomatal opening in response to Tl and closing in response to elevated [CO2], along with the effects on associated physiological processes (such as E and A), differed between the two species. The interplay between elevated Tl, which increased gs, and elevated [CO2], which decreased gs, differed between the two species, suggesting that it could contribute to differences in behaviour among species in the predicted future climate. The two experimental species stand at opposite ends of the range of mechanisms for stomatal adjustment of water loss. E in poplar continuously increased with increasing VPD, while E of loblolly pine remained the same over a large range of VPD within a given Tl and increased with increases in Tl (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. S2). These results suggest that gs is regulated by more complex mechanisms than simply E (Mott and Parkhust, 1991), and that temperature changes affect the relationship between E and gs. Leaf water potential declined with both increased temperature and increased VPD in both species (Fig. 5). Typically, gs declines with a decline in water potential across a wide range of both iso- and anisohydric species (Klein, 2014). But in our study, despite a decline in water potential, gs increased with temperature. Stomata may have opened with increasing temperature owing to, in part, changes in hydraulic conductivity. When temperature increases, the viscosity of water declines and mesophyll conductance (gm) increases, which may improve the supply of water to sites of evaporation and thus increase stomatal aperture (Cochard ; von Caemmerer and Evans, 2015). However, this increase was not great enough to prevent a decline in leaf water potential. Therefore, it was proposed that resistance to water vapour and heat transfer among sites of evaporation and guard cells, which induce differences in temperature and VPD at these sites, may also regulate stomatal opening in response to transpiration and Tl (Mott and Peak, 2013). The general increase in overall tree hydraulic conductance due to water viscosity may be further modified by temperature-dependent variability in tree xylem hydraulic conductance, which, due to differences in vascular traits, may contribute to differences in the responses of conifers and angiosperm trees (Wolf ). Changes in leaf gm may be further paired with xylem resistance to embolism and the safety margin against cavitation, which is higher in conifers than in angiosperms (Choat ). Trees adjust their gs to maximize CO2 uptake (resulting in higher E) but still protect xylem against excessive cavitation (Brodribb ). Loblolly pine strictly regulated transpiration such that it did not change with variation in VPD, thus protecting xylem against cavitation and maintaining a broad safety margin. However, when temperature increased, loblolly pine was not able to maintain this strict control over water loss, so E increased. This result may suggest that in the pine, overall resistance of the hydraulic pathway (including xylem and mesophyll resistance) significantly contributed to regulation of transpiration and that stomatal regulation was at least partly independent of E. In contrast, the broadleaf poplar exerted the same degree of stomatal control on E at all temperatures. The inability of loblolly pine to regulate E when temperature increases may negatively impact survival with climate change and may contribute to succession by angiosperm tree species (Carnicer ). Apart from plant water status, other mechanisms known to regulate gs are related to photosynthesis, to which stomata often present a large limitation. L in loblolly pine is usually lower than 65%. Higher Ls may occur but it is usually attributed to low soil water potential or low temperature (Teskey ; Sasek and Richardson, 1989; Ellsworth, 2000). In this study, when VPD was high, L of 78% was observed at 30°C (Table 1), indicating strong stomatal control of carbon gain in the range of temperature which is optimal for photosynthesis. With increasing Tl, L declined. Therefore, photosynthesis of loblolly pine may partly benefit from the decline in Ls at increased temperature, even though the extremely high temperature will set biochemical limits to A and the resulting A may be the same or lower. In contrast to loblolly pine, Ls in poplar was unaffected by Tl and was generally lower than 20%. Low Ls in poplar in this study corresponded to low Ls in poplar observed previously; for example, Ls averaged 10% in two clones of Populus (Noormets and Sober, 2001). The lower L in poplar compared with loblolly pine may have been related to the ratio of gs to gm. Although we did not measure gm, it is generally lower in conifers than in angiosperm trees (Flexas ), suggesting Ls should also be lower. However, because Ls was not lower, we speculate that the ratio of gs to gm also differed between the species. The high Asat in poplar might be related to high gs/gm, which could support increased photosynthesis by increasing Ci and keeping [CO2] at the chloroplasts high. It could also increase nutrient acquisition through increased E, which would enhance photosynthetic capacity. gm also increases with temperature in a wide range of species (von Caemmerer and Evans, 2015). However, this mechanism does not explain the increase in gs at supra-optimal temperatures at which Asat becomes low or negative. Low Ls in poplar was linked to high gs, which results in low water use efficiency of photosynthesis. The advantage of low Ls, which favours fast-growing species under an unlimited soil water supply, may jeopardize their existence during heat waves when high E depletes available soil water, resulting in increased drought stress, especially under initial conditions of low soil moisture. The effect of variable Ls was further demonstrated by the alteration of Ci in loblolly pine. Normally the ratio of Ci:Ca is highly conserved (Liu and Teskey, 1995), as was observed in poplar when Ci consistently remained at ~300 μmol mol−1 at all temperatures (Fig. 3a). However, Ci in loblolly pine was highly variable, ranging from ~165 µmol mol−1 at 20°C to ~240 µmol mol−1 at 40°C (Fig. 3c), which corresponds with prior observations of high variability in Ci with changing environmental conditions in this species (Green and Mitchell, 1992).

Evaporative cooling

Evaporation of water from the leaf surface can significantly lower Tl (Monteith, 1981; Jones, 1999). As long as stomata remain open, evaporative cooling can mitigate the negative effect of supra-optimal Ta on A during heat waves and can positively affect photosynthesis, yield, and plant survival (Lu ; Ameye ). Maintaining Tl through regulation of E to minimize stress at high Ta was theoretically suggested (Mahan and Upchurch, 1988) and observations in Arabidopsis thaliana indicated that plants regulate water loss and even adjust their architecture to achieve the best cooling effect (Crawford ). The magnitude of the cooling effect is often several degrees (Jones, 1999; Feller, 2006). In our study the maximum cooling, 9°C, was observed in poplar at high Ta and high VPD (Fig. 4). This rate of cooling lowered Tl from 49 to 40°C and positive A was observed at this extreme Ta. In contrast to poplar, gs of loblolly pine was roughly 10 times lower and therefore the maximum cooling effect was only 0.9°C. Consequently, at Ta of 49°C, poplar had positive A and loblolly pine did not. The cooling effect due to stomatal opening at high temperature (under well-watered conditions) is likely to be much more beneficial in species with high gs than those with low gs. Evaporative cooling may help plants survive heat waves, especially when the air is dry. However, this mechanism requires sufficient soil water supply, which relies on high soil water capacity and sufficient hydraulic conductivity. With a long-duration heat wave, high E may result in the depletion of soil water storage and plants will no longer be able to utilize this mechanism to minimize heat stress. This effect was observed in our study: only a very small cooling effect (1.1°C) was observed in drought-stressed trees (Fig. 4b). Nevertheless, evaporative cooling proved to have a significant effect on A and may play an important role in the diurnal regulation of Tl during short-duration heat waves. In addition to soil water availability, elevated [CO2] affects gs. Stomatal closure resulting from elevated [CO2] will to some degree counteract the opening effect of elevated temperature. Results of this study, demonstrating that stomata of poplar are more sensitive to [CO2] than stomata of loblolly pine, were similar to previous findings on broadleaf and conifer species in general (Medlyn ). Therefore, if stomata in broadleaf species close in response to future predicted increases in [CO2], the difference in the rate of evaporative cooling between broadleaf and conifer species may shrink.

Relationships among gs, Ci, and A

In both species we found that the positive relationship between Asat and gs observed at lower temperatures was not present at extremely high temperatures. The most obvious impairment occurred at a Tl >40°C, when Asat became negative and yet the stomata remained open (Fig. 3). Ci at this temperature increased and approached the ambient [CO2] of 400 µmol mol−1. Under these conditions a reduction in gs would be expected (Hashimoto ), but instead the stomata opened even more. These results do not imply that stomata do not react to Ci. Rather, it appears that there was a direct stomatal response to supra-optimal temperature that overrode the response to Ci. Many models of gs assume a fixed relationship between A and gs regardless of temperature (Ball ; Leuning, 1995; Buckley ). These models have been widely used and, in a comparison with other models of gs, provided the best results (Way ). Our study also provided evidence of a stable relationship between Asat and gs at low temperatures (Fig. 3). However, that stability did not hold true at high temperature. As an extreme example, when Asat became negative at temperatures over ~40°C, the ratio A:Ci also became negative in both species. In such a case, the Ball–Berry–Leuning model, which uses that ratio to predict gs, would provide negative values of gs. Correctly predicting gs from photosynthesis and vice versa, especially at extreme temperatures during heat waves, will require detailed study of the interplay among A, Ci, VPD, Tl, and possibly other factors driving stomatal regulation, which, when applied simultaneously, can have complex effects (Merilo ).

Conclusions

We conclude that Tl has a direct effect on stomatal opening in the two tree species we examined. For accurate predictions of gs and plant water use this temperature dependency should be taken into account, especially at high temperatures. Elevated [CO2] reduced gs of both species but general trends of increasing gs with increasing Tl remained similar regardless of [CO2]. Along with changes in gs, Tl also affected Ls to photosynthesis, Ci, and corresponding A. A became negative in both species at extremely high Tl. However, the effect of evaporative cooling, which lowered Tl in the rapidly transpiring poplar, significantly increased A. gs was decoupled from A at high Tl in both species, which is an indication that substantial changes are likely in gas exchange physiology at high temperatures. Further research should focus on verifying results of this laboratory study in the field, as well as discovering the principles of temperature dependency of stomatal regulation and implementing temperature functions into the models of gs.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online. Fig. S1. Gs of poplar and loblolly pine and its dependence on Ta and VPD. Fig. S2. E and Ci of poplar and loblolly pine and their dependence on Ta and VPD. Fig. S3. Asat of poplar and loblolly pine and its dependence on gs at Ta 20–49°C. Table S1. Regression equations and parameters of models used in Figs 1–5. Click here for additional data file.
  30 in total

1.  Temperature effects on hydraulic conductance and water relations of Quercus robur L.

Authors:  H Cochard; R Martin; P Gross; M B Bogeat-Triboulot
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine.

Authors:  Hamlyn G Jones; Manfred Stoll; Tiago Santos; Claudia de Sousa; M Manuela Chaves; Olga M Grant
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century.

Authors:  Gerald A Meehl; Claudia Tebaldi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought.

Authors:  Brendan Choat; Steven Jansen; Tim J Brodribb; Hervé Cochard; Sylvain Delzon; Radika Bhaskar; Sandra J Bucci; Taylor S Feild; Sean M Gleason; Uwe G Hacke; Anna L Jacobsen; Frederic Lens; Hafiz Maherali; Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; Stefan Mayr; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick J Mitchell; Andrea Nardini; Jarmila Pittermann; R Brandon Pratt; John S Sperry; Mark Westoby; Ian J Wright; Amy E Zanne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The effect of induced heat waves on Pinus taeda and Quercus rubra seedlings in ambient and elevated CO2 atmospheres.

Authors:  Maarten Ameye; Timothy M Wertin; Ingvar Bauweraerts; Mary Anne McGuire; Robert O Teskey; Kathy Steppe
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Photosynthesis and isoprene emission from trees along an urban-rural gradient in Texas.

Authors:  Eleanor C Lahr; Gunnar W Schade; Caitlin C Crossett; Matthew R Watson
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  The Effect of Temperature on the Occurrence of O(2) and CO(2) Insensitive Photosynthesis in Field Grown Plants.

Authors:  R F Sage; T D Sharkey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Responses of foliar gas exchange to long-term elevated CO(2) concentrations in mature loblolly pine trees.

Authors:  S Liu; R O Teskey
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.196

9.  Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species.

Authors:  Susanne von Caemmerer; John R Evans
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 7.228

10.  Contrasting trait syndromes in angiosperms and conifers are associated with different responses of tree growth to temperature on a large scale.

Authors:  Jofre Carnicer; Adrià Barbeta; Dominik Sperlich; Marta Coll; Josep Peñuelas
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  29 in total

1.  Abscisic Acid Receptors and Coreceptors Modulate Plant Water Use Efficiency and Water Productivity.

Authors:  Zhenyu Yang; Jinghui Liu; Fabien Poree; Rudi Schaeufele; Hendrik Helmke; Jens Frackenpohl; Stefan Lehr; Pascal von Koskull-Döring; Alexander Christmann; Hans Schnyder; Urs Schmidhalter; Erwin Grill
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Stomatal conductance increases with rising temperature.

Authors:  Josef Urban; Miles Ingwers; Mary Anne McGuire; Robert O Teskey
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2017-08-08

3.  Guard Cells Integrate Light and Temperature Signals to Control Stomatal Aperture.

Authors:  Kalliopi-Ioanna Kostaki; Aude Coupel-Ledru; Verity C Bonnell; Mathilda Gustavsson; Peng Sun; Fiona J McLaughlin; Donald P Fraser; Deirdre H McLachlan; Alistair M Hetherington; Antony N Dodd; Keara A Franklin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Lethal heat stress-dependent volatile emissions from tobacco leaves: what happens beyond the thermal edge?

Authors:  Satpal Turan; Kaia Kask; Arooran Kanagendran; Shuai Li; Rinaldo Anni; Eero Talts; Bahtijor Rasulov; Astrid Kännaste; Ülo Niinemets
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Jasmonic Acid Is Required for Plant Acclimation to a Combination of High Light and Heat Stress.

Authors:  Damián Balfagón; Soham Sengupta; Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas; Felix B Fritschi; Rajeev K Azad; Ron Mittler; Sara I Zandalinas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Physiological characterization of the wild almond Prunus arabica stem photosynthetic capability.

Authors:  Taly Trainin; Hillel Brukental; Or Shapira; Ziv Attia; Vivekanand Tiwari; Kamel Hatib; Shira Gal; Hanita Zemach; Eduard Belausov; Dana Charuvi; Doron Holland; Tamar Azoulay-Shemer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  An extreme heatwave enhanced the xanthophyll de-epoxidation state in leaves of Eucalyptus trees grown in the field.

Authors:  Namraj Dhami; John E Drake; Mark G Tjoelker; David T Tissue; Christopher I Cazzonelli
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2020-01-10

8.  Unexpected Connections between Humidity and Ion Transport Discovered Using a Model to Bridge Guard Cell-to-Leaf Scales.

Authors:  Yizhou Wang; Adrian Hills; Silvere Vialet-Chabrand; Maria Papanatsiou; Howard Griffiths; Simon Rogers; Tracy Lawson; Virgilio L Lew; Michael R Blatt
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 9.  'Omics' approaches in developing combined drought and heat tolerance in food crops.

Authors:  Anjali Bhardwaj; Poonam Devi; Shikha Chaudhary; Anju Rani; Uday Chand Jha; Shiv Kumar; H Bindumadhava; P V Vara Prasad; Kamal Dev Sharma; Kadambot H M Siddique; Harsh Nayyar
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  The Impact of Heat Stress on Morpho-Physiological Response and Expression of Specific Genes in the Heat Stress-Responsive Transcriptional Regulatory Network in Brassica oleracea.

Authors:  Mahdi Moradpour; Siti Nor Akmar Abdullah; Parameswari Namasivayam
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.