Literature DB >> 28338638

The Value of Coenzyme Q10 Determination in Mitochondrial Patients.

Delia Yubero1, George Allen2, Rafael Artuch3, Raquel Montero4.   

Abstract

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ) is a lipid that is ubiquitously synthesized in tissues and has a key role in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Its biochemical determination provides insight into the CoQ status of tissues and may detect CoQ deficiency that can result from either an inherited primary deficiency of CoQ metabolism or may be secondary to different genetic and environmental conditions. Rapid identification of CoQ deficiency can also allow potentially beneficial treatment to be initiated as early as possible. CoQ may be measured in different specimens, including plasma, blood mononuclear cells, platelets, urine, muscle, and cultured skin fibroblasts. Blood and urinary CoQ also have good utility for CoQ treatment monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coenzyme Q10 deficiency; mitochondrial diseases; treatment monitoring

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338638      PMCID: PMC5406769          DOI: 10.3390/jcm6040037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


1. Introduction

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ) is a lipid that acts in the mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) as the electron transporter from Enzymatic Complexes I and II to Complex III. Recognized biological functions of CoQ include an essential role in energy biosynthesis in the form of ATP, free radical detoxification, stabilization of mitochondrial enzymatic complexes, binding to the permeability transition pore, and the function of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins [1]. Almost all cells have the capacity for CoQ, and at least 13 genes have been shown to be required for endogenous production of CoQ. Furthermore, additional genes also influence CoQ availability such as those related with acetyl-CoA metabolism or those that can cause secondary reduction in CoQ biosynthesis or increase its degradation [2,3]. CoQ deficiency has been associated with different clinical phenotypes and genetic conditions [4] and environmental factors can also influence CoQ availability [5]. Regardless of the cause, the impairment of CoQ status can result in profound deficits to mitochondrial function. Treatment with CoQ supplementation can result in clinical improvement in CoQ deficiency, and early measurement of CoQ status is therefore of fundamental importance to allow the rapid initiation of treatment. Unfortunately, response to CoQ supplementation in trials with other mitochondrial disorders has been disappointing [6,7]. However, the lack of efficacy could potentially relate to delayed treatment; consequently, further studies are needed to ascertain whether early identification of CoQ deficiency in mitochondrial patients may help identify those in whom CoQ supplementation may yet prove beneficial [7].

2. Diagnostic Issues of CoQ Deficiency Syndromes

Currently, it is known that 8 of the 13 genes related to CoQ biosynthesis (COQ genes) can cause human disease [4], but these primary conditions are extremely rare. However, secondary CoQ deficiency is a common feature in a range of diseases. This susceptibility may be due to the intricate mechanisms and biological functions in which CoQ participates. Secondary deficiencies can occur in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) disorders [2,6,7] and in a broad spectrum of non-OXPHOS disorders [3]. Interestingly, the prevalence of muscle CoQ deficiency was demonstrated to be similar for both OXPHOS and non-OXPHOS disease patients [3]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that CoQ status may be an accurate predictor of deficient activity of MRC components [8,9], so routine CoQ measurement within the diagnostic workflow of OXPHOS disease seems advisable, especially for muscle biopsies. Primary CoQ deficiency is considered a rare mitochondrial disorder associated with a heterogeneous clinical phenotype [4]. Nevertheless, clinical identification of potential cases is of paramount importance to initiate investigations that may provide early diagnosis and initiation of specific treatment, especially as some CoQ-deficient patients respond well to high oral doses of CoQ [10]. The clinical picture in primary CoQ deficiency can include ataxia with cerebellar involvement (the most common phenotype of CoQ deficiency syndromes), multiple organ failure in neonatal-onset forms, kidney disease, deafness, or muscular involvement [4], amongst others. The biochemical findings consist of a variable degree of CoQ deficiency in tissues (muscle/fibroblasts), which in turn may cause a reduction in the activity of the CoQ-dependent mitochondrial respiratory chain (Complexes I + III and Complexes II + III in muscle, Complexes glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) + III and Complexes II + III in fibroblasts). However, it is not possible to biochemically distinguish between primary and secondary CoQ deficiencies nor to identify candidate genes for mutational analysis [11]. The initial stage of laboratory analysis is the biochemical identification of CoQ deficiency. Reduced activities of CoQ-dependent enzymes are indicative of CoQ deficiency, suggesting a decrease in electron transfer related to the quinone pool. This is supported by the restoration of Complex II + III activity after incubation with exogenous ubiquinone [12,13,14]. Nevertheless, direct quantitative measurement of CoQ levels is the most reliable test for diagnosis [15]. Essential to this is the choice of tissue for analysis. This may often be a balance between obtaining the most reliable sample for CoQ measurement and minimizing invasive procedures. However, some specimens such as plasma may not be suitable for the diagnosis of primary CoQ deficiency since misleading partial restoration of CoQ values from dietary sources of CoQ can occur in plasma. After establishing the biochemical diagnosis, the next step is to identify the specific genetic defect. Next-generation sequencing has largely replaced the need to serially sequence individual COQ genes and other genes associated with secondary deficiency and thus has profoundly changed the diagnostic process [11]. Nevertheless, biochemical measurements still play an important role in the diagnostic pathway by providing rapid and reliable demonstration of CoQ deficiency that allows early treatment initiation. In this chapter, we will review the state of the art in CoQ measurement, utilizing different biological specimens for the investigation of mitochondrial disorders for both diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up. Additionally, we will highlight the advantages and pitfalls of CoQ determination in such specimens.

3. CoQ Determination in Biological Samples. What Can We Expect?

CoQ is ubiquitously synthesized and found in almost all human cells, with higher CoQ concentrations found in organs with high-energy demand and metabolic rate. The measurement of both reduced and oxidized forms of CoQ allows for the determination of total CoQ, and this provides an optimal measure to detect CoQ deficiencies. CoQ levels in a range of specimen types from patients with mitochondrial diseases have been demonstrated to be lower than control values [6,7,16,17]. However, the particular CoQ distribution in distinct cellular fractions and the complexity of biological matrices makes the biological sample choice and preparation a critical step in the CoQ quantification process [18]. Additionally, since CoQ deficiency may be tissue-specific [19], invasive procedures are frequently needed in order to assess endogenous CoQ in the target organ, especially in muscle. Thus, it can be of value to analyze CoQ status in a full range of sample types, as a deficiency may remain undetected if the appropriate specimen is not chosen. Table 1 summarizes the different biological specimens and technical approaches for accurate CoQ determination.
Table 1

Advantages and limitations for the CoQ analysis in different biological specimens.

TissueAdvantagesLimitations
PlasmaMinimally invasiveIdentification of secondary CoQ deficienciesCoQ treatment monitoringLow diagnostic yield for CoQ deficiency in mitochondrial disordersCoQ values modified by external sources
LeukocytesPlateletsMinimally invasiveCorrelation with CoQ tissue levelsCoQ treatment monitoringFresh preparationTime-consumingFew reported experiences in mitochondrial disorders.
MuscleGood diagnostic yield for CoQ deficiencyOther mitochondrial studies can be performedInvasiveNo treatment monitoring
FibroblastsGood diagnostic yield for some CoQ deficienciesFunctional studies can be performed (CoQ biosynthesis)Unlimited biological material for further studiesFalse negative results in some cases
UrineNon-invasiveEasily detectable CoQ valuesTreatment monitoring purposesCorrelation with kidney CoQ status remains to be established

Note: Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ).

3.1. Blood Plasma

Plasma CoQ is influenced by both dietary intake and hepatic biosynthesis [20]. Exogenous CoQ is absorbed through the gut by a complex process that can involve both active and passive mechanisms [21]. CoQ is then redistributed via the blood linked to cholesterol transporter lipoproteins [22] that act as the major carrier of CoQ in circulation [23]. The first step of patient CoQ estimation may be based on plasma measurement. However, CoQ status in plasma can be affected by both dietary supply and lipoprotein concentration. It is noteworthy that dietary sources of CoQ can significantly influence plasma CoQ concentrations, contributing up to 25% of the total amount [23]. For this reason, it has been suggested that plasma CoQ evaluation is not reliable for the diagnosis of primary CoQ deficiencies [24] as partial correction of CoQ levels may occur due to dietary consumption of CoQ or increases in cholesterol availability. Indeed, in most patients with primary CoQ deficiencies, plasma CoQ values are normal. Conversely, a reduction of plasma CoQ is not frequently observed in the general population, and although there is no demonstrated correlation of plasma and tissue CoQ values, decreased levels may reliably indicate secondary CoQ deficiencies associated with diseases such as phenylketonuria and lysosomal storage diseases [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Whether plasma CoQ can be used to indicate deficient tissue CoQ status in patients with mitochondrial disorders remains unknown at present. While the usefulness of plasma CoQ analysis for the diagnosis of CoQ deficiency remains to be established, plasma CoQ determination has a critical role for CoQ treatment monitoring [31]. CoQ therapy is commonly used for the treatment of mitochondrial disorders and the follow-up of these patients should include regular plasma CoQ quantification. This allows for informed adjustment of the oral CoQ dose, the control of treatment compliance and confirmation of adequate CoQ intestinal absorption. The degree of distribution of this supplemented plasma CoQ from blood to affected tissues remains to be demonstrated and is still a matter of debate.

3.2. Blood Cells

Since analysis of plasma CoQ has limitations for diagnosis and avoidance of invasive first-step diagnostic procedures for the investigation of mitochondrial patients is desirable, a range of studies have tested the reliability of CoQ determination in different blood cell types. Remarkably, leukocyte CoQ levels correlate well with that of skeletal muscle and therefore represent a good alternative to evaluate endogenous CoQ [20]. Moreover, these cells can also display changes in cellular CoQ status upon CoQ supplementation [32]. This approach should be applicable for the identification of some patients with primary CoQ deficiencies. However, there is a lack of experience with these cells in most specialist clinical chemistry laboratories. Reference values have been reported [33], but no large-scale studies of mitochondrial diseases have been published. Unfortunately, the utility of this specimen currently remains constrained by technical limitations, including difficulties concerning sample collection and processing. Similarly, platelet CoQ evaluation seems to be a good indicator of mitochondrial electron transport chain function [34,35]. Some studies have reported platelets as being a useful material for the determination of cellular CoQ content and of great utility for clinical monitoring CoQ treatment [36,37]. Although no reference values have been established, it is of note that platelet CoQ measurement may be advantageous compared to plasma during CoQ supplementation by providing a more representative measurement of cellular uptake and steady-state conditions [37]. However, even though detailed information about sample preparation and methods of detection are available, no studies of a large patient series have been published in relation to platelet CoQ evaluation for diagnosis or for follow-up in mitochondrial diseases. Another possibility is to employ lymphoblastoid cell lines [11]. These cells combine the advantages and disadvantages of mononuclear cells and fibroblasts (see below) in that they do not require invasive procedures and allow for functional measurements. However, experience with these cells in clinical laboratories is very limited and the immortalization procedure may cause artifacts. In particular, immortalized cells tend to compensate the CoQ deficiency by overexpressing components of the CoQ biosynthetic machinery, so this may mask partial deficiencies.

3.3. Muscle

Muscle biopsy material continues to be the best current option for investigations of CoQ status in mitochondrial disorders, with a biochemical diagnosis of CoQ deficiency indicated from the measurement of total CoQ content in muscle homogenates. The main advantage of this biological specimen is that other biochemical and histological studies may be conducted in parallel to evaluate the functional condition of the mitochondria, including measurement of mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme activities, expression and assembly of mitochondrial complexes, and an assessment of the characteristic histopathological features of mitochondrial diseases [8]. Typically, a part of the muscle biopsy is processed in fresh conditions for histopathological and functional studies whilst the remaining sample is frozen immediately at −80 °C until analysis. The frozen samples are useful for CoQ determination and some other mitochondrial studies, with a minimum of 20–40 mg of muscle biopsy required for CoQ measurement [8]. Muscle CoQ deficiency is relatively common in patients with mitochondrial disorders [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Biochemically, it may be concomitantly present with decreased Complexes I + III and Complexes II + III activities, although other MRC complexes may be affected [8]. However, not all patients with muscle CoQ deficiency show MRC abnormalities, supporting the role of this molecule in other essential biological processes beyond energy production [2,17]. Some investigators have proposed CoQ redox status as a biomarker for oxidative stress [8,38]. However, this requires extensive and complicated investigations and is unnecessary to establish the diagnosis of CoQ deficiency. In the last few years, a large list of mutated genes in patients who display secondary muscle CoQ deficiency has been reported [2,3,4,5,6,7]. All of these authors concluded that muscle CoQ deficiency is a frequent finding in mitochondrial disorders in general, with primary CoQ deficiency a much rarer condition. Clearly, some of these patients may benefit from CoQ supplementation aimed at restoring CoQ values and thus improving clinical outcomes [39]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that muscle CoQ values are a good predictor of MRC enzyme function with a utility at least equal to citrate synthase activity [9]. This provides added value for muscle CoQ analysis in the investigation of mitochondrial disorders.

3.4. Fibroblasts

Skin fibroblasts are also a good specimen for demonstrating CoQ deficiency [40]. CoQ content and MRC enzyme activities can be measured in fibroblasts alongside different in vitro studies for assessing CoQ synthesis and other metabolic pathways [41,42]. Fibroblast CoQ deficiency may be accompanied by decreased activities of Complexes G3P + III and Complexes II + III that may or may not be associated with deficiency of other MRC complexes [17]. Fibroblasts are usually obtained from minimally invasive skin punch biopsies and after culturing in standard medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin) [40], these cells are amenable to biobank storage, making them a very valuable material for future investigations. To analyze CoQ content, cultured skin fibroblasts are homogenized and lipids are extracted before CoQ quantification [43]. In addition, in vitro investigation of CoQ biosynthetic capacity can be performed in cultured fibroblasts. These assays are used to analyze the incorporation of radiolabeled substrates into CoQ, such as [3H]-mevalonate and [14C]-4-hydroxybenzoate, or that of stable isotopes with the measurement of synthesized CoQ by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with radiometric or tandem mass spectometry (MS–MS) detection [41,44,45]. These studies have been demonstrated to be very useful in discriminating between a primary CoQ deficiency, where the CoQ biosynthesis downstream of the provided substrates is impaired, and secondary CoQ deficiencies, where other mechanisms leading to CoQ deficiency are expected [41]. However, some limitations inherent to fibroblasts have been reported. For example, patients with muscle CoQ deficiency may show normal CoQ values in fibroblasts [46], and secondary fibroblast CoQ deficiency has been described in patients with other non-mitochondrial diseases [41]. Other investigations in cultured skin fibroblast have provided insights about key pathophysiological aspects implicated in CoQ deficiency, such as impairment of ATP synthesis or increased free radical damage [47,48]. Other pathophysiological mechanisms proposed include the implication of CoQ in pyrimidine biosynthesis (demonstrated in COQ2-mutant fibroblasts) [49] and the potential induction of mitophagy in response to CoQ deficiency [50]. Cotan et al. [51] reported that MELAS fibroblasts show a significant reduction of the mitochondrial membrane potential associated with secondary CoQ deficiency, which triggers mitochondrial degradation by mitophagy. Fragaki et al. [52] also observed a secondary mitochondrial dysfunction in ganglioside GM3 synthase (EC:2.4.99.9) deficient patients (including decrease in Complexes I + III and Complexes II + III in the liver among other MRC abnormalities in fibroblasts), leading to the impairment of normal mitochondrial electron flow and proton pumping, including a drop in mitochondrial membrane potential and an increase in apoptosis.

3.5. Urine

Mitochondrial diseases can be associated with renal involvement. Interestingly, primary CoQ deficiency patients can present with a nephrotic syndrome either in isolation or in combination with other clinical signs [53,54]. This is perhaps not surprising given that renal tubules and glomerular podocytes are rich in mitochondria, allowing them to satisfy a high metabolic demand. Moreover, dramatic clinical improvement of patients with renal disease and CoQ deficiency has been observed following CoQ supplementation [10]. Urinary tract CoQ analysis could be an appropriate approach to assessing kidney CoQ status and may help fulfill the critical need for less invasive procedures to determine tissue CoQ status. Recently, a new methodology for the measurement of CoQ in urine has been standardized, including the establishment of reference values for a pediatric control population [55]. This new evaluation of urinary tract CoQ is a noninvasive procedure that might be useful for estimating CoQ kidney status for diagnosis and especially for CoQ treatment monitoring.

3.6. Other Biological Samples

CoQ is present in all tissues with its abundance in individual tissues associated with energy requirements or metabolic activity. Consequently, CoQ content displays a great variability between different organs and even between cells within the same organ [33]. Several authors have reported reduced CoQ levels in other tissues such as liver or kidney in patients with mitochondrial diseases [6,56,57]. However, these procedures require invasive biopsy procedures that can only be justified if other options for investigations of CoQ status have been exhausted. Experimental measurement of CoQ has also been reported in cardiac tissue obtained from patients undergoing heart transplantation [58]. This study found moderate decreases in CoQ in patients with heart failure in comparison to those without heart failure. CoQ deficiency can present with profound neurological features, so measurement of CoQ in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has the potential to provide important clinical insight as an indicator of brain CoQ status. The concentration of CSF CoQ is in the low nanomolar range and therefore requires specialist analysis by tandem mass spectrometry [59]. Reference ranges have been established for CoQ in CSF, and a suggested application for this technique is in the identification of cerebral CoQ deficiency, although pathological samples were not reported [59]. Very recently, a new approach for CoQ determination has been described using non-invasive mouth swab collection of buccal mucosa cells for CoQ measurement by micro-HPLC. This technique may prove to be valuable for monitoring pediatric patients [60].

4. CoQ Quantification: Technical Aspects

The gold standard procedure for biochemical diagnosis of CoQ deficiency is the analysis of CoQ concentration by HPLC with ultraviolet or electrochemical detection [11]. Recently, new procedures for CoQ determination have been developed based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [41], allowing not only CoQ quantification but also an estimation of the CoQ biosynthetic rate in fibroblast cell cultures incubated with adequate CoQ precursors. Methodological approaches for CoQ measurement are reviewed in another chapter of this issue. Typical CoQ chromatograms from serum, urine, muscle, and cultured skin fibroblasts are depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Normal Coenzime Q10 (CoQ) chromatograms of different biological specimens. (A) serum; (B) urine; (C) muscle; (D) cultured skin fibroblasts. In each specimen, type Q9 and Q10 have a different retention time that is related to differences in sample matrices and the high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) column length required for separation.

5. Conclusions

CoQ is a molecule involved in multiple essential biological functions mainly within the mitochondria. The intricate metabolic pathways related to CoQ biosynthesis and metabolism underlie a vulnerability to frequent reductions in the concentration of this molecule as a consequence of different disease states, but are especially relevant in mitochondrial disorders. Because of this, the measurement of CoQ status in different biological specimens can be considered an essential part of the diagnostic and research workflows for patients with mitochondrial disorders and for CoQ treatment monitoring. This is particularly crucial as CoQ deficiency can be a treatable condition in some cases, so early recognition of the CoQ-deficient status is important to allow for the commencement of CoQ therapy as soon as possible.
  60 in total

Review 1.  Plasma coenzyme Q10 response to oral ingestion of coenzyme Q10 formulations.

Authors:  Hemmi N Bhagavan; Raj K Chopra
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.160

2.  Missense mutation of the COQ2 gene causes defects of bioenergetics and de novo pyrimidine synthesis.

Authors:  José M López-Martín; Leonardo Salviati; Eva Trevisson; Giovanni Montini; Salvatore DiMauro; Catarina Quinzii; Michio Hirano; Angeles Rodriguez-Hernandez; Mario D Cordero; José A Sánchez-Alcázar; Carlos Santos-Ocaña; Plácido Navas
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  Coenzyme Q deficiency in muscle.

Authors:  Eva Trevisson; Salvatore DiMauro; Placido Navas; Leonardo Salviati
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.710

4.  Fatal heart failure associated with CoQ10 and multiple OXPHOS deficiency in a child with propionic acidemia.

Authors:  Konstantina Fragaki; Aline Cano; Jean-François Benoist; Odile Rigal; Annabelle Chaussenot; Cécile Rouzier; Sylvie Bannwarth; Céline Caruba; Brigitte Chabrol; Véronique Paquis-Flucklinger
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.160

Review 5.  Heterogeneity of coenzyme Q10 deficiency: patient study and literature review.

Authors:  Valentina Emmanuele; Luis C López; Luis López; Andres Berardo; Ali Naini; Saba Tadesse; Bing Wen; Erin D'Agostino; Martha Solomon; Salvatore DiMauro; Catarina Quinzii; Michio Hirano
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2012-08

6.  Treatment of CoQ(10) deficient fibroblasts with ubiquinone, CoQ analogs, and vitamin C: time- and compound-dependent effects.

Authors:  Luis C López; Catarina M Quinzii; Estela Area; Ali Naini; Shamima Rahman; Markus Schuelke; Leonardo Salviati; Salvatore Dimauro; Michio Hirano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Coenzyme Q10 is frequently reduced in muscle of patients with mitochondrial myopathy.

Authors:  Sabrina Sacconi; Eva Trevisson; Leonardo Salviati; Ségolène Aymé; Odile Rigal; Alberto Garcia Redondo; Michelangelo Mancuso; Gabriele Siciliano; Paola Tonin; Corrado Angelini; Karine Auré; Anne Lombès; Claude Desnuelle
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 4.296

8.  Neonatal liver failure and Leigh syndrome possibly due to CoQ-responsive OXPHOS deficiency.

Authors:  E Leshinsky-Silver; A Levine; A Nissenkorn; V Barash; M Perach; E Buzhaker; M Shahmurov; S Polak-Charcon; D Lev; T Lerman-Sagie
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.797

Review 9.  Discovery of ubiquinone (coenzyme Q) and an overview of function.

Authors:  Frederick L Crane
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 4.160

10.  A nonsense mutation in COQ9 causes autosomal-recessive neonatal-onset primary coenzyme Q10 deficiency: a potentially treatable form of mitochondrial disease.

Authors:  Andrew J Duncan; Maria Bitner-Glindzicz; Brigitte Meunier; Harry Costello; Iain P Hargreaves; Luis C López; Michio Hirano; Catarina M Quinzii; Michael I Sadowski; John Hardy; Andrew Singleton; Peter T Clayton; Shamima Rahman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  7 in total

1.  Primary Coenzyme Q deficiency Due to Novel ADCK3 Variants, Studies in Fibroblasts and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Adel Shalata; Michael Edery; Clair Habib; Jacob Genizi; Mohammad Mahroum; Lama Khalaily; Nurit Assaf; Idan Segal; Hoda Abed El Rahim; Hana Shapira; Danielle Urian; Shay Tzur; Liza Douiev; Ann Saada
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Genes and lipids that impact uptake and assimilation of exogenous coenzyme Q in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Lucía Fernández-Del-Río; Miranda E Kelly; Jaime Contreras; Michelle C Bradley; Andrew M James; Michael P Murphy; Gregory S Payne; Catherine F Clarke
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Biochemical Assessment and Monitoring of Mitochondrial Disease.

Authors:  Iain P Hargreaves
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Endothelial dysfunction in neuroprogressive disorders-causes and suggested treatments.

Authors:  Gerwyn Morris; Basant K Puri; Lisa Olive; Andre Carvalho; Michael Berk; Ken Walder; Lise Tuset Gustad; Michael Maes
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Urinary coenzyme Q10 as a diagnostic biomarker and predictor of remission in a patient with ADCK4-associated Glomerulopathy: a case report.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Xiaohua Liao; Yupeng Jiang; Xin Lv; Yue Yu; Qin Dai; Liyun Ao; Lijian Tao; Zhangzhe Peng
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  The Roles of Coenzyme Q in Disease: Direct and Indirect Involvement in Cellular Functions.

Authors:  Francesco Pallotti; Christian Bergamini; Costanza Lamperti; Romana Fato
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  The Effect of CoQ10 Supplementation on Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer Undergoing Tamoxifen Therapy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Seyed Ahmad Hosseini; Nazanin Zahrooni; Ahmad Ahmadzadeh; Kambiz Ahmadiangali; Mohammad-Ali Assarehzadegan
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-02-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.