| Literature DB >> 28338061 |
Rais Ahmad Khan1, Mohammad Usman2, Rajakumar Dhivya3, Perumalsamy Balaji3, Ali Alsalme1, Hamad AlLohedan1,4, Farukh Arjmand2, Khalid AlFarhan1, Mohammad Abdulkader Akbarsha3, Fabio Marchetti5, Claudio Pettinari5, Sartaj Tabassum1,2,4.
Abstract
NewEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28338061 PMCID: PMC5364558 DOI: 10.1038/srep45229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of the synthesis of 1 and 2.
Figure 2Gas phase B3LYP/DFT optimized structure of complexes 1 and 2.
Figure 3B3LYP/DFT simulated vibrational spectra of (a) complex 1 and (b) complex 2.
Figure 4B3LYP/TDDFT simulated electronic absorption spectra of complexes 1 and 2.
Some selected experimental and calculated wavenumbers of complexes 1 and 2.
| Vibrational Band | Complex 1 | Complex 1 | Complex 2 | Complex 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental (cm−1) | Calculated (cm−1) | Experimental (cm−1) | Calculated (cm−1) | |
| v(O-H) stretching | 3047 | 3079 | 3097 | 3109 |
| v(Ar-CH) stretching | 2916 | 2934 | 2957 | 2994 |
| v(-CH3) symmetrical stretching | 2829 | 2824 | 2918 | 2965 |
| v(C = O) symmetrical stretching | 1706 | 1707 | 1715 | 1729 |
| v(C-O-H) anti-symmetrical stretching | 1383 | 1359 | 1385 | 1375 |
| v(C-N) stretching | 1251 | 1263 | 1250 | 1264 |
Figure 5Frontier MOs contour plots (isovalue 0.03) of complex 1 using the B3LYP/DFT method.
Figure 6Frontier MOs contour plots (isovalue 0.03) of complex 2 using the B3LYP/DFT method.
Figure 7Absorption spectral traces of complexes (a) 1 and (b) 2 in 95:5% H2O:DMSO/5 mM Tris HCl-50 mM NaCl buffer at pH 7.4 upon addition of CT DNA.
Figure 8Emission spectra of EthBr-CTDNA in the absence and presence of compound (a) 1 and (b) 2 in 5 mMTris–HCl/50 mM NaCl buffer at pH 7.4. Arrows show the emission intensity changes upon increasing the concentration of the complexes.
Figure 9Circular dichroism spectra of CT DNA in the absence and presence of compound (a) 1 and, (b) 2 in 5 mM Tris–HCl/50 mM NaCl buffer at pH 7.4.
Figure 10(a) Electrophoretic pattern of pBR322 DNA (100 ng) with increasing concentration of complex 1 (5–25 μM) after 30 min incubation time in buffer (5 mMTris-HCl/50 mM NaCl, pH = 7.2 at 25 °C) (concentration dependent). (b) Cleavage pattern of pBR322 plasmid DNA (100 ng) by complex 1 (10 μM) in the presence of reactive oxygen species viz., DMSO (0.4 mM), EtOH (0.4 mM), NaN3 (0.4 mM) and SOD (10 U), after incubation for 30 min in the buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl/50 mM NaCl, pH = 7.2 at 25 °C.
Figure 11Gel mobility pattern for the cleavage of pBR322 DNA (100 ng) by complex 1 (10 μM) in the presence of major/minor groove recognition element: lane 1, 1 + Distamycin + DNA; lane 2, 1 + Methyl green + DNA; Lane 3, 1 + DAPI + DNA; lane 4, DNA only, control, at 25 °C after incubation for 30 min.
Figure 12Molecular docked model of (i) complex 1 and (ii) complex 2, in the (a) cavity of minor groove of DNA (b) binding site interactions with hydrogen bonding donor (purple) and acceptor (green) surface of minor groove residues.
Non-covalent interactions of complexes 1 and 2 with the DNA.
| Name | Distance (Å) | Category | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| A:DG12:OP1 - :Complex | 4.65 | Electrostatic | Pi-Anion |
| B:DG16 - :Complex | 5.23 | Hydrophobic | Pi-Pi Stacked |
| B:DG14 - :Complex | 4.82 | Hydrophobic | Pi-Pi T-shaped |
| A:DG10 - :Complex | 4.53 | Hydrophobic | Pi-Alkyl |
| A:DC11- : Complex | 4.43 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| B:DC15 - : Complex | 3.65 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| B:DG16 - : Complex | 3.08 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| B:DG16 - : Complex | 4.67 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| B:DG16 - : Complex | 3.58 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| B:DC23:OP1 - :Complex | 3.52 | Electrostatic | Pi-Anion |
| B:DC21 - :Complex | 5.28 | Hydrophobic | Pi-Alkyl |
| B:DG22 - : Complex | 4.64 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| B:DG22 - : Complex | 4.38 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| B:DG16 - : Complex | 3.58 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| B:DC23 - : Complex | 4.63 | Pi-Alkyl |
Figure 13Molecular docked model of (i) complex 1 and (ii) complex 2, (a) with human-DNA-Topo-I (70 kDa) (PDB ID: 1SC7) (b) Non-covalent interaction of complex 1 with the active site residues.
Non-covalent interactions of complexes 1 and 2 with the Human–DNA–Topo–I.
| Name | Distance (Å) | Category | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| D:Complex | 2.89 | Hydrogen Bond | Conventional |
| B:DT10 - D: Complex | 4.26 | Pi-Pi T-shaped | |
| C:DG12 - D: Complex | 4.96 | Pi-Pi T-shaped | |
| D:DA113 - D: Complex | 5.20 | Pi-Pi T-shaped | |
| D:Complex | 5.43 | Alkyl | |
| B:DT10 - D: Complex | 5.48 | Hydrophobic | Pi-Alkyl |
| C:DG12 - D: Complex | 2.70 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| C:DG12 - D: Complex | 5.20 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| C:DG12 - D: Complex | 3.16 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| D:DA113 - D:Complex | 5.58 | Pi-Pi Stacked | |
| C:DG12 - D: Complex | 4.26 | Pi-Pi T-shaped | |
| D: Complex | 3.93 | Pi-Pi T-shaped | |
| C:DG12 - D: Complex | 2.47 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| C:DG12 - D: Complex | 3.55 | Hydrophobic | Pi-Alkyl |
| C:DG12 - D: Complex | 4.72 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| D:DC111 - D: Complex | 5.07 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| D:DC112 - D: Complex | 3.68 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| D:DA113 - D: Complex | 4.22126 | Pi-Alkyl |
Figure 14Molecular docked model of (i) (a) complex 1 and (a’) complex 2 into the ATP binding pocket of human Topo-IIα (PDB ID: 1ZXM).(ii) (b) complex 1 and (b’) complex 2, the non-covalent interaction with the Topo IIα.
Non-covalent interactions of complex 2 with the Topo–II.
| Name | Distance (Å) | Category | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| A:ARG98:NH2 - : Complex | 3.75 | Electrostatic | Pi-Cation |
| A:HIS130 - : Complex | 5.20 | Pi-Pi T-shaped | |
| Complex 1:C - A:PRO126 | 3.95 | Hydrophobic | Alkyl |
| Complex | 3.05 | Alkyl | |
| Complex | 5.37 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| Complex | 5.30 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| Complex | 5.36 | Pi-Alkyl | |
| Complex | 3.63 | Alkyl | |
| A:TRP194 - : Complex | 4.95 | Hydrophobic | Pi-Orbitals |
| Complex | 5.43 | Pi-Orbitals | |
| Complex | 4.49 | Pi-Orbitals |
In vitro cytotoxicity assay for complexes 1, 2 and cisplatin against HepG2 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells.
| Synthetic complex/Drug standard | IC50 for 24 h (μM) |
|---|---|
| Complex | 3.3 ± 0.02 |
| Complex | na |
| Cisplatin | 7.2 ± 0.04 |
*na means not active.
Figure 15(A) Hoechst 33258 staining of the complex 1-induced apoptosis of HepG2 cells. The graph shows the manual count of apoptotic cells as a percentage (data are mean% ± SD% of three experiments). (B) Representative morphological changes observed in HepG2 cells treated with 1 (STR2) adopting Hoechst 33258 staining.
Figure 16AO/EB staining of the complex 1-induced apoptosis of HepG2 cells. The graph shows the manual count of apoptotic cells as a percentage (data are mean% ± SD% of three experiments). (B) Representative morphological changes observed in HepG2 cells treated with 1 by dopting AO/EB staining.