Literature DB >> 28334352

The Human Neural Alpha Response to Speech is a Proxy of Attentional Control.

Malte Wöstmann1, Sung-Joo Lim1, Jonas Obleser1.   

Abstract

Human alpha (~10 Hz) oscillatory power is a prominent neural marker of cognitive effort. When listeners attempt to process and retain acoustically degraded speech, alpha power enhances. It is unclear whether these alpha modulations reflect the degree of acoustic degradation per se or the degradation-driven demand to a listener's attentional control. Using an irrelevant-speech paradigm and measuring the electroencephalogram (EEG), the current experiment demonstrates that the neural alpha response to speech is a surprisingly clear proxy of top-down control, entirely driven by the listening goals of attending versus ignoring degraded speech. While (n = 23) listeners retained the serial order of 9 to-be-recalled digits, one to-be-ignored sentence was presented. Distractibility of the to-be-ignored sentence parametrically varied in acoustic detail (noise-vocoding), with more acoustic detail of distracting speech increasingly disrupting listeners' serial memory recall. Where previous studies had observed decreases in parietal and auditory alpha power with more acoustic detail (of target speech), alpha power here showed the opposite pattern and increased with more acoustic detail in the speech distractor. In sum, the neural alpha response reflects almost exclusively a listener's goal, which is decisive for whether more acoustic detail facilitates comprehension (of attended speech) or enhances distraction (of ignored speech).
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic detail; alpha oscillation; attention; speech; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334352     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  27 in total

1.  Temporal Expectation Modulates the Cortical Dynamics of Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Anna Wilsch; Molly J Henry; Björn Herrmann; Christoph S Herrmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  How the visual brain detects emotional changes in facial expressions: Evidence from driven and intrinsic brain oscillations.

Authors:  Rafaela R Campagnoli; Matthias J Wieser; L Forest Gruss; Maeve R Boylan; Lisa M McTeague; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Alpha Oscillations in the Human Brain Implement Distractor Suppression Independent of Target Selection.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Mohsen Alavash; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cell type-specific excitability probed by optogenetic stimulation depends on the phase of the alpha oscillation.

Authors:  Mengsen Zhang; Flavio Frohlich
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Decoding Object-Based Auditory Attention from Source-Reconstructed MEG Alpha Oscillations.

Authors:  Ingmar E J de Vries; Giorgio Marinato; Daniel Baldauf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural dynamics differentially encode phrases and sentences during spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Fan Bai; Antje S Meyer; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 9.593

8.  Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  EEG power spectral dynamics associated with listening in adverse conditions.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Destiny R Bell; Michelle Wheeler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.348

10.  Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech.

Authors:  Frauke Kraus; Sarah Tune; Anna Ruhe; Jonas Obleser; Malte Wöstmann
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.