Literature DB >> 31641052

Alpha Oscillations in the Human Brain Implement Distractor Suppression Independent of Target Selection.

Malte Wöstmann1, Mohsen Alavash2, Jonas Obleser1.   

Abstract

In principle, selective attention is the net result of target selection and distractor suppression. The way in which both mechanisms are implemented neurally has remained contested. Neural oscillatory power in the alpha frequency band (∼10 Hz) has been implicated in the selection of to-be-attended targets, but there is lack of empirical evidence for its involvement in the suppression of to-be-ignored distractors. Here, we use electroencephalography recordings of N = 33 human participants (males and females) to test the preregistered hypothesis that alpha power directly relates to distractor suppression and thus operates independently from target selection. In an auditory spatial pitch discrimination task, we modulated the location (left vs right) of either a target or a distractor tone sequence, while fixing the other in the front. When the distractor was fixed in the front, alpha power relatively decreased contralaterally to the target and increased ipsilaterally. Most importantly, when the target was fixed in the front, alpha lateralization reversed in direction for the suppression of distractors on the left versus right. These data show that target-selection-independent alpha power modulation is involved in distractor suppression. Although both lateralized alpha responses for selection and for suppression proved reliable, they were uncorrelated and distractor-related alpha power emerged from more anterior, frontal cortical regions. Lending functional significance to suppression-related alpha oscillations, alpha lateralization at the individual, single-trial level was predictive of behavioral accuracy. These results fuel a renewed look at neurobiological accounts of selection-independent suppressive filtering in attention.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although well established models of attention rest on the assumption that irrelevant sensory information is filtered out, the neural implementation of such a filter mechanism is unclear. Using an auditory attention task that decouples target selection from distractor suppression, we demonstrate that two sign-reversed lateralized alpha responses reflect target selection versus distractor suppression. Critically, these alpha responses are reliable, independent of each other, and generated in more anterior, frontal regions for suppression versus selection. Prediction of single-trial task performance from alpha modulation after stimulus onset agrees with the view that alpha modulation bears direct functional relevance as a neural implementation of attention. Results demonstrate that the neurobiological foundation of attention implies a selection-independent alpha oscillatory mechanism to suppress distraction.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alpha oscillations; attention; auditory; selection; suppression

Year:  2019        PMID: 31641052      PMCID: PMC6891068          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1954-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  56 in total

1.  α-Oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking.

Authors:  Saskia Haegens; Verónica Nácher; Rogelio Luna; Ranulfo Romo; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Resampling permutation probability values for Cronbach's alpha.

Authors:  Andrew J Prelog; Kenneth J Berry; Paul W Mielke
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2009-04

3.  Brain oscillatory substrates of visual short-term memory capacity.

Authors:  Paul Sauseng; Wolfgang Klimesch; Kirstin F Heise; Walter R Gruber; Elisa Holz; Ahmed A Karim; Mark Glennon; Christian Gerloff; Niels Birbaumer; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The spectrotemporal filter mechanism of auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Gabriella Musacchia; Monica N O'Connel; Arnaud Y Falchier; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Eye movements explain decodability during perception and cued attention in MEG.

Authors:  Silvan C Quax; Nadine Dijkstra; Mariel J van Staveren; Sander E Bosch; Marcel A J van Gerven
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Diminished pre-stimulus alpha-lateralization suggests compromised self-initiated attentional control of auditory processing in old age.

Authors:  Martin J Dahl; Liesa Ilg; Shu-Chen Li; Susanne Passow; Markus Werkle-Bergner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  The functional role of alpha-band activity in attentional processing: the current zeitgeist and future outlook.

Authors:  Rosanne M Van Diepen; John J Foxe; Ali Mazaheri
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-25

8.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task.

Authors:  P Vendrell; C Junqué; J Pujol; M A Jurado; J Molet; J Grafman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  The role of alpha oscillations in spatial attention: limited evidence for a suppression account.

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; Edward Awh
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-08

10.  Cortical alpha oscillations as a tool for auditory selective inhibition.

Authors:  Antje Strauß; Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  18 in total

1.  Effects of auditory selective attention on neural phase: individual differences and short-term training.

Authors:  Aeron Laffere; Fred Dick; Adam Tierney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The Role of Object Individuation in Attention and Visual Processing.

Authors:  Bridgitt Shea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Noradrenergic modulation of rhythmic neural activity shapes selective attention.

Authors:  Martin J Dahl; Mara Mather; Markus Werkle-Bergner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Decoding Object-Based Auditory Attention from Source-Reconstructed MEG Alpha Oscillations.

Authors:  Ingmar E J de Vries; Giorgio Marinato; Daniel Baldauf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Reliability of Neural Entrainment in the Human Auditory System.

Authors:  Yuranny Cabral-Calderin; Molly J Henry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Alpha Activity Reflects the Magnitude of an Individual Bias in Human Perception.

Authors:  Laetitia Grabot; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neurofeedback Training of Alpha Relative Power Improves the Performance of Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Qing Zhou; Ruidong Cheng; Lin Yao; Xiangming Ye; Kedi Xu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Cortical responses to auditory novelty across task conditions: An intracranial electrophysiology study.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Mitchell Steinschneider; Ariane E Rhone; Bryan M Krause; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew I Banks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Unilateral Acoustic Degradation Delays Attentional Separation of Competing Speech.

Authors:  Frauke Kraus; Sarah Tune; Anna Ruhe; Jonas Obleser; Malte Wöstmann
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Reduced alpha amplitudes predict perceptual suppression.

Authors:  Eva Poland; Aishwarya Bhonsle; Iris Steinmann; Melanie Wilke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.