Literature DB >> 28333707

The Effect of Sedation on Cortical Activation: A Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of Sedation With Midazolam, Propofol, and Dexmedetomidine on Auditory Processing.

Michael A Frölich1, Catiffaney Banks, Timothy J Ness.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Every day, millions of people undergo surgical procedures facilitated by anesthesia. Yet, there is no clinically accepted measure to predict the effects of sedation or anesthesia on the central nervous system. Auditory brain activation may provide an objective and quantifiable method to measure of the effects of sedation on neuronal processing.
METHODS: This is a randomized clinical trial. Forty-eight healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 sedative drugs (midazolam [n = 11], propofol [n = 12], or dexmedetomidine [n = 12]) at a concentration adjusted to achieve mild sedation by self-rating, or to a no-drug control group (n = 13). Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while listening to music in a 5-minute block design experiment. We tested the hypothesis that mild sedation changes the magnitude or extent of cortical activation of an auditory stimulus.
RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in auditory activation in both the dexmedetomidine (P = .001) and midazolam (P = .029) but not the propofol group (P = .619) when compared with saline control.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that, compared with saline control, there is a significant reduction of brain activation in the auditory cortex in response to midazolam and dexmedetomidine but not propofol when given at mildly sedative doses. This method serves as a novel approach to quantify the effects of sedative agents in an objective fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28333707      PMCID: PMC5524185          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  31 in total

1.  National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary.

Authors:  Margaret Jean Hall; Carol J DeFrances; Sonja N Williams; Aleksandr Golosinskiy; Alexander Schwartzman
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2010-10-26

2.  A new initiative on precision medicine.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Harold Varmus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Hemodynamic characteristics of midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Michael A Frölich; Alireza Arabshahi; Charles Katholi; Jeevan Prasain; Stephen Barnes
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.452

4.  Cortical processing of complex auditory stimuli during alterations of consciousness with the general anesthetic propofol.

Authors:  Gilles Plourde; Pascal Belin; Daniel Chartrand; Pierre Fiset; Steven B Backman; Guoming Xie; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Biomarkers for the effects of benzodiazepines in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S J de Visser; J P van der Post; P P de Waal; F Cornet; A F Cohen; J M A van Gerven
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Differential effects of deep sedation with propofol on the specific and nonspecific thalamocortical systems: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Xiaolin Liu; Kathryn K Lauer; B Douglas Ward; Shi-Jiang Li; Anthony G Hudetz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Computer-controlled infusion of intravenous dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in adult human volunteers.

Authors:  J B Dyck; M Maze; C Haack; D L Azarnoff; L Vuorilehto; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Effect of age, gender, and obesity on midazolam kinetics.

Authors:  D J Greenblatt; D R Abernethy; A Locniskar; J S Harmatz; R A Limjuco; R I Shader
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  Neurocognitive dysfunction risk alleviation with the use of dexmedetomidine in perioperative conditions or as ICU sedation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Li; Huixia Wang; Hui Wu; Chengjie Gao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Monitoring sedation for bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated patients by using the Ramsay sedation scale versus auditory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chien-Wei Hsu; Shu-Fen Sun; Kuo-An Chu; David Lin Lee; Kam-Fai Wong
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.317

View more
  5 in total

1.  Disrupted neural variability during propofol-induced sedation and unconsciousness.

Authors:  Zirui Huang; Jun Zhang; Jinsong Wu; Xiaoge Liu; Jianghui Xu; Jianfeng Zhang; Pengmin Qin; Rui Dai; Zhong Yang; Ying Mao; Anthony G Hudetz; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Neuropsychopharmacological effects of midazolam on the human brain.

Authors:  Junkai Wang; Pei Sun; Peipeng Liang
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 3.  How general anesthetics work: from the perspective of reorganized connections within the brain.

Authors:  Teo Jeon Shin; Pil-Jong Kim; Bernard Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  A comparison of the use of propofol alone and propofol with midazolam for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation - a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  RyungA Kang; Young Hee Shin; Nam-Su Gil; Ki Yoon Kim; Hyean Yeo; Ji Seon Jeong
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Dexmedetomidine is superior to midazolam for sedation and cerebral protection in postoperative hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Weiyi Gong; Shuguang Zhang; Xiaoliang Li; Lei Shi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.