BACKGROUND: The extent to which complex auditory stimuli are processed and differentiated during general anesthesia is unknown. The authors used blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the processing words (10 per period; compared with scrambled words) and nonspeech human vocal sounds (10 per period; compared with environmental sounds) during propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Seven healthy subjects were tested. Propofol was given by a computer-controlled pump to obtain stable plasma concentrations. Data were acquired during awake baseline, sedation (propofol concentration in arterial plasma: 0.64 +/- 0.13 microg/ml; mean +/- SD), general anesthesia (4.62 +/- 0.57 microg/ml), and recovery. Subjects were asked to memorize the words. RESULTS: During all periods including anesthesia, the sounds conditions combined elicited significantly greater activations than silence bilaterally in primary auditory cortices (Heschl gyrus) and adjacent regions within the planum temporale. During sedation and anesthesia, however, the magnitude of the activations was reduced by 40-50% (P < 0.05). Furthermore, anesthesia abolished voice-specific activations seen bilaterally in the superior temporal sulcus during the other periods as well as word-specific activations bilaterally in the Heschl gyrus, planum temporale, and superior temporal gyrus. However, scrambled words paradoxically elicited significantly more activation than normal words bilaterally in planum temporale during anesthesia. Recognition the next day occurred only for words presented during baseline plus recovery and was correlated (P < 0.01) with activity in right and left planum temporale. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that during anesthesia, the primary and association auditory cortices remain responsive to complex auditory stimuli, but in a nonspecific way such that the ability for higher-level analysis is lost.
BACKGROUND: The extent to which complex auditory stimuli are processed and differentiated during general anesthesia is unknown. The authors used blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the processing words (10 per period; compared with scrambled words) and nonspeech human vocal sounds (10 per period; compared with environmental sounds) during propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Seven healthy subjects were tested. Propofol was given by a computer-controlled pump to obtain stable plasma concentrations. Data were acquired during awake baseline, sedation (propofol concentration in arterial plasma: 0.64 +/- 0.13 microg/ml; mean +/- SD), general anesthesia (4.62 +/- 0.57 microg/ml), and recovery. Subjects were asked to memorize the words. RESULTS: During all periods including anesthesia, the sounds conditions combined elicited significantly greater activations than silence bilaterally in primary auditory cortices (Heschl gyrus) and adjacent regions within the planum temporale. During sedation and anesthesia, however, the magnitude of the activations was reduced by 40-50% (P < 0.05). Furthermore, anesthesia abolished voice-specific activations seen bilaterally in the superior temporal sulcus during the other periods as well as word-specific activations bilaterally in the Heschl gyrus, planum temporale, and superior temporal gyrus. However, scrambled words paradoxically elicited significantly more activation than normal words bilaterally in planum temporale during anesthesia. Recognition the next day occurred only for words presented during baseline plus recovery and was correlated (P < 0.01) with activity in right and left planum temporale. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that during anesthesia, the primary and association auditory cortices remain responsive to complex auditory stimuli, but in a nonspecific way such that the ability for higher-level analysis is lost.
Authors: Xiaolin Liu; Kathryn K Lauer; Barney D Ward; Stephen M Rao; Shi-Jiang Li; Anthony G Hudetz Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Xiaolin Liu; Kathryn K Lauer; B Douglas Ward; Christopher J Roberts; Suyan Liu; Suneeta Gollapudy; Robert Rohloff; William Gross; Zhan Xu; Shanshan Chen; Lubin Wang; Zheng Yang; Shi-Jiang Li; Jeffrey R Binder; Anthony G Hudetz Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Daniil P Aksenov; Limin Li; Michael J Miller; Gheorghe Iordanescu; Alice M Wyrwicz Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Patrick L Purdon; Eric T Pierce; Giorgio Bonmassar; John Walsh; P Grace Harrell; Jean Kwo; Daniel Deschler; Margaret Barlow; Rebecca C Merhar; Camilo Lamus; Catherine M Mullaly; Mary Sullivan; Sharon Maginnis; Debra Skoniecki; Helen-Anne Higgins; Emery N Brown Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Jonathan D Kenny; Jessica J Chemali; Joseph F Cotten; Christa J Van Dort; Seong-Eun Kim; Demba Ba; Norman E Taylor; Emery N Brown; Ken Solt Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.108