Literature DB >> 8655681

Value of quantitative pathological variables as prognostic factors in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

M Brinkhuis1, J P Baak, G A Meijer, P J van Diest, O Mogensen, P Bichel, J P Neijt.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate correlations among clinical, pathological, morphometric, stereological, and DNA flow cytometric variables and their prognostic value in advanced ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Tissue was collected from 180 patients with advanced ovarian cancer. All 180 had undergone debulking surgery and were being treated with cisplatin. Long term follow up was available for all patients. The mitotic activity index (MAI), volume % of epithelium (VPE), mean nuclear area (MNA), standard deviation of the nuclear area (SDNA), estimates of volume weighted mean nuclear volume (nu v), and variables obtained from minimum spanning tree (MST) analysis were assessed in the least differentiated tumour section in each case. DNA flow cytometry was also performed.
RESULTS: Quantitative pathological features differed significantly with respect to histological grade. The MAI, MNA, SDNA, and the number of points connected to three neighbours differed significantly among the different DNA ploidy groups. The VPE and number of points connected to two or three neighbours differed significantly between FIGO stages III and IV. Fifty two (29%) patients survived. FIGO stage, residual disease and SDNA had prognostic significance on both univariate and multivariate survival analysis. In patients with FIGO III stage disease and residual tumour nodes < or = 2 cm in diameter (67 patients, 29 (43%) survivors) a prognostic index was established based on SDNA and of the line length of the MST. The median survival time was not reached in a subgroup of patients with favourable prognosis (overall survival 57%). Median survival was 32 months for patients with an unfavourable index score (overall survival 28%).
CONCLUSION: Morphometric variables have important additional value in predicting prognosis in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8655681      PMCID: PMC500348          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.49.2.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  38 in total

1.  Nuclear morphometry: a strong prognostic factor for survival after secondary surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  T. Högberg; G. Wang; B. Risberg; C. Guerrieri; J. Hittson; B. Boeryd; B. K>>gedal; E. Simonsen
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Clinical implications of metastatic process.

Authors:  P Frost; B Levin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Prognostic significance of tumor cell morphometry, histopathology, and clinical parameters in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  C Ludescher; A R Weger; J Lindholm; D Oefner; H Hausmaninger; R Reitsamer; G Mikuz
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia.

Authors:  J Folkman; K Watson; D Ingber; D Hanahan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Ovarian carcinoma. A decade of progress.

Authors:  M S Piver
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Cell kinetics and chemotherapy: a critical review.

Authors:  I Tannock
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-08

7.  The Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP). A nationwide prospective study on reproducibility and prognostic power of routine quantitative assessments in The Netherlands.

Authors:  J P Baak; P J van Diest; A T Ariens; M W van Beek; S M Bellot; J Fijnheer; L H van Gorp; W S Kwee; J Los; H C Peterse
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.250

8.  Flow cytometric DNA ploidy and S-phase heterogeneity in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  J Kaern; C G Tropé; G B Kristensen; E O Pettersen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The prognostic variability of ovarian tumor grading by different pathologists.

Authors:  J P Baak; F A Langley; A Talerman; J F Delemarre
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  The prognostic value of morphometrical features and cellular DNA content in cis-platin treated late ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  J P Baak; N W Schipper; E C Wisse-Brekelmans; T Ceelen; F T Bosman; H van Geuns; J Wils
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Morphological effects of chemotherapy on ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  W G McCluggage; R W Lyness; R J Atkinson; S P Dobbs; I Harley; H R McClelland; J H Price
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Predicting and replacing the pathological Gleason grade with automated gland ring morphometric features from immunofluorescent prostate cancer images.

Authors:  Faisal M Khan; Richard Scott; Michael Donovan; Gerardo Fernandez
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-02-28

3.  A prognostic model for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  T G Clark; M E Stewart; D G Altman; H Gabra; J F Smyth
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.