Literature DB >> 26100187

Will supplemental screening ultrasound increase breast cancer overdiagnosis?

Virginia M Molleran1.   

Abstract

Overdiagnosis refers to the detection of cancers that would never come to light in a patient's lifetime and are only identified by means of screening. Exactly how much overdiagnosis currently exists with screening mammography is uncertain. Because we do not know for certain which tumors would ultimately lead to death if left untreated and which would not, we cannot directly measure overdiagnosis and how best to estimate it is a matter of controversy. A conservative estimate of overdiagnosis with mammography would be on the order of 10%, but estimates have ranged as high as 54%. We know from multiple studies that ultrasound (US) screening mostly detects small, invasive, node-negative cancers; and in the ACRIN 6666 study, there was a greater tendency for US-only-detected tumors to be low grade than those detected with mammography. However, the population of patients undergoing screening US can be expected to differ from the average screening mammography population in that they will have higher breast density, they will be younger, and they may also have higher breast cancer risk than the population undergoing screening mammography. These factors may be associated with more aggressive tumors. There is no way to know whether we will be increasing overdiagnosis without performing a large randomized controlled study with very long-term follow-up. Even if some cancers are overdiagnosed with US, there will be a greater proportion of lethal breast cancers that are successfully treated because of screening US. The more important task is to learn how to correctly diagnose and appropriately treat nonlethal cancers.
Copyright © 2015 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Overdiagnosis; breast cancer; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100187     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  5 in total

1.  3D Supine Automated Ultrasound (SAUS, ABUS, ABVS) for Supplemental Screening Women with Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Alexander Mundinger
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 2.  Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices.

Authors:  Elizabeth Morris; Stephen A Feig; Madeline Drexler; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Overall assessment system of combined mammography and ultrasound for breast cancer screening in Japan.

Authors:  Koji Ohnuki; Eriko Tohno; Hiroko Tsunoda; Takayoshi Uematsu; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.239

4.  Synergy in combining findings from mammography and ultrasonography in detecting malignancy in women with higher density breasts and lesions over 2 cm in Albania.

Authors:  Altin Malaj; Albana Shahini
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2017-01-12

5.  Clinicopathological characteristics and long-term prognosis of screening detected non-palpable breast cancer by ultrasound in hospital-based Chinese population (2001-2014).

Authors:  Bo Pan; Ru Yao; Qing-Li Zhu; Chang-Jun Wang; Shan-Shan You; Jing Zhang; Qian-Qian Xu; Feng Cai; Jie Shi; Yi-Dong Zhou; Feng Mao; Yan Lin; Jing-Hong Guan; Song-Jie Shen; Zhi-Yong Liang; Yu-Xin Jiang; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.